We have two chat boards - The Regional chat which doesn't appear to get used much and for those in a league - the League Chat.

Council comments come in green, blue and red fonts to indicate a certain information area and these comments appear in the League Chat comments area.

I would like to put forward a suggestion of retaining the red fonted Council comments on the league chat board which indicate beacon raids, downgrading etc and the blue and green fonted Council comments be relocated to the Regional Chat board. 

My only exception to this is that some blue font comments are important and maybe they could appear on the league chat if the information applies directly to that specific league?

My reasoning for the suggestion is that our league chat board is very active as probably like many other leagues and every now and again, the Council comments interrupt information which is passed on to fellow league members and as people cannot review old comments once gone, the longer it remains in the open, the less chance of people missing it. 

Regards,

Manxy

I will pass your suggestion.

We have two chat boards - The Regional chat which doesn't appear to get used much and for those in a league - the League Chat.

Council comments come in green, blue and red fonts to indicate a certain information area and these comments appear in the League Chat comments area.

I would like to put forward a suggestion of retaining the red fonted Council comments on the league chat board which indicate beacon raids, downgrading etc and the blue and green fonted Council comments be relocated to the Regional Chat board. 

My only exception to this is that some blue font comments are important and maybe they could appear on the league chat if the information applies directly to that specific league?

My reasoning for the suggestion is that our league chat board is very active as probably like many other leagues and every now and again, the Council comments interrupt information which is passed on to fellow league members and as people cannot review old comments once gone, the longer it remains in the open, the less chance of people missing it. 

Regards,

Manxy

Hello,

  Just started recently. I've noticed it's seven minutes to sell mundane/ common items in your chest. The items are terribly repetitive and if you're engaging in a lot of battles, you fill up a lot of space. I'm aware that extra space can be purchased, etc. I'm aware that with rank new space will open, etc. My question is: Can you possibly lower the "sell time" from that 7 minutes? Maybe even just 1 or 2 minutes would help get rid of the deluge of reoccurring items in lower levels. Thanks for reading this. And I'm expecting that big red "DECLINED" to be in the reply. :)

Chop98

glasherz said:

Rodeo said:

Rodeo said:

Rodeo said:

Another Suggestion:

It will be good to have an option to send units from Catacomb to my own castle.

But you already have this option.

We could send units only from castle to catacomb not the other way around.

Unable to paste the screenshot just like before.Please refer below screenshot: Yellow arrow is possible, not the red Arrow.

http://image.prntscr.com/image/373a48fec28843dc95a4d06254921848.jpg

Send - Sends them to Catacombs.

Recall - Sends them to Castle.

So everytime i wanted to send some defense or a number of spy units to my own caste , your suggestion is to send first to some other castle and then recall it to my castle. I feel it is not the right way of doing it...

Rodeo..... the recall button in your keep does send the troops from YOUR catacombs into YOUR castle, not somewhere else. 

Got it Thank u

My suggestion is:

Instead of "Send" Button - Rename it to " Send To Catacombs"

Rodeo said:

Rodeo said:

Fair Fight over holding Hamlet:

I have been observing the Hamlet and its level over a period of time now.

A Particular hamlet is visible only to a a Particular range of  Castles. Currently that range is too broad.

This does not allow players to have a fair challenge at the Hamlets.

For Example:

Lets say a particular Hamlet is visible to the following range of Levels ( Level 54 to  Level 69). This does not allow  a Level 54 player to challenge and compete with the players at level 69.There will not be a fair Fight.

My suggestion is Narrow down the range of visibility to a difference of 5 Levels. 

Declined. We can't create so many groups of Hamlets. Server needs to track and keep information about all groups, and making more of them would raise the load.

My suggestion is only to narrow down the range of visibility not to increase the number of hamlets

You wouldn't be able to see many of them in that case. It's not efficient.

Rodeo said:

Rodeo said:

Rodeo said:

Keep - Drop down Option - for Differently-abled community:

It will be good to have a drop down button than having a scroll. Also need to know our total offense and total defense in the keep. This should be displayed irrespective of my units in castle or in catacomb.(if possible units sent for raids,in my sieged castle,in reinforcement castle).

To see your total strength, you need to choose Units. It doesn't work any other way, as all the bonuses are dynamic.

The total Strength features, i have highlighted in yellow is not present in the Keep , i have created this image just to illustrate how it will look like.

currently in the Keep we do not have option to select total units and see the strength.The Drop down option will allow us to select all and see the total strength.

The option is available when i click send button then i can see the strength of units i;m about to send it to Catacomb. but there is a need for an option to see the strength of units inside the catacomb.

Rodeo Said

I guess you have missed to review this Suggestion.

Currently you can select sending to Catacombs and see the total number if you need to.

Suggestion:

Allow players to say which server is their primary/default account?  

When someone wins one of the contests or Plarium gives sapphires to everyone, the sapphires are applied to their account. Unfortunately, they go to whichever server they first signed up with, for example  I have castles on both Dark and Untamed, and prefer the sapphires to go to Untamed since I am more active there, but they are always sent to Dark.  It is possible to get the sapphires switched over, but it is a hassle to all involved to do so. 

Possibly add a list of the servers people are playing on to their profile, with the ability to pick a primary for situations such as this? 

All rewards for contests are added manually. Usually they are sent to server 1. If you want to receive Sapphires or Units on a specific server, please specify it in your post or contact Lord Oberon and ask him to transfer your reward to another server. 

Suggestion:

Sentry House - should allow us to train only Infantry.(in this, different units should be allowed to get trained independent of each other)

Order of Nights - should allow us to train only cavalry.(in this, different units should be allowed to get trained independent of each other)

Council of Mages - should allow us to train only Occult.(in this, different units should be allowed to get trained independent of each other)

Hall of Shadows - should allow us to train only shadows.

A new building for Beasts (suggestion)

Thieves Guild - should allow us to train thieves and also manage him only via thieves guild.(like sending him for any raid activity)

A thief should not even be allowed to manages from our Keep . He does not have the respect of a Knight.

Our developers have declined a suggestion to add extra training queues. Here is the main reason:

Rodeo said:

Rodeo said:

Rodeo said:

Rodeo said:

Keep - Drop down Option - for Differently-abled community:

It will be good to have a drop down button than having a scroll. Also need to know our total offense and total defense in the keep. This should be displayed irrespective of my units in castle or in catacomb.(if possible units sent for raids,in my sieged castle,in reinforcement castle).

To see your total strength, you need to choose Units. It doesn't work any other way, as all the bonuses are dynamic.

The total Strength features, i have highlighted in yellow is not present in the Keep , i have created this image just to illustrate how it will look like.

currently in the Keep we do not have option to select total units and see the strength.The Drop down option will allow us to select all and see the total strength.

The option is available when i click send button then i can see the strength of units i;m about to send it to Catacomb. but there is a need for an option to see the strength of units inside the catacomb.

Rodeo Said

I guess you have missed to review this Suggestion.

Currently you can select sending to Catacombs and see the total number if you need to.

Send Button - On clicking this, i can see the total strength in castle after selecting the respective category .

Recall Button - On clicking this, i can see the total strength in catacomb after selecting the respective category .

I learned it the hard way. Thank you

Is it possible to make it so we can either sell our eir's wands or upgrade them to a weors wand? I have too many and it's a complete waste.

dworka777 said:

League quest: Train units should renamed to Buy units. It is confusing, since training means resources + time, but the counter is actually set on how many units you buy.

But you need to set the training, right?

What are you even talking about ? Current quest DEFINITION means units that had undergone and finished training. If it would meant units which are currently in train, then it would need to count all my rows of creating/training of new units, which is nonsense. But the counter applies on units which you purchase and you put in training, hence you gather the resources and buy their training, so that you essentially buy them and not train them. Indeed you are right they are TRAINING, but there are more of them which are TRAINING as I said before this leads nowhere.

Rodeo said:

Suggestion:

Sentry House - should allow us to train only Infantry.(in this, different units should be allowed to get trained independent of each other)

Order of Nights - should allow us to train only cavalry.(in this, different units should be allowed to get trained independent of each other)

Council of Mages - should allow us to train only Occult.(in this, different units should be allowed to get trained independent of each other)

Hall of Shadows - should allow us to train only shadows.

A new building for Beasts (suggestion)

Thieves Guild - should allow us to train thieves and also manage him only via thieves guild.(like sending him for any raid activity)

A thief should not even be allowed to manages from our Keep . He does not have the respect of a Knight.

Our developers have declined a suggestion to add extra training queues. Here is the main reason:

You will build Units faster, but your rivals will also build them faster. You won't feel any improvements.

I 'll try to put this in a different perspective.

What is the reason in having different building but allowing us to train all the units from Sentry house itself.

What does a Thief doing in a Keep with other units.

My suggestion is to have option to train units from their respective building .

If parallel queues are not possible then, discard that point alone .

This suggestion is transferred from Game Discussion Forum in to Suggestion Forum:

My Suggestion is to increase the number of Allies count in the House of Unity.

we are now allowed to have 6 Allies as a Maximum Limit.

Instead,  if this count can be increased similar to total number of allowed Contacts limit (100 Contacts) and allow us to Purchase more slots for allies using soulstone it will be good.

Rodeo said:

Suggestion:

Sentry House - should allow us to train only Infantry.(in this, different units should be allowed to get trained independent of each other)

Order of Nights - should allow us to train only cavalry.(in this, different units should be allowed to get trained independent of each other)

Council of Mages - should allow us to train only Occult.(in this, different units should be allowed to get trained independent of each other)

Hall of Shadows - should allow us to train only shadows.

A new building for Beasts (suggestion)

Thieves Guild - should allow us to train thieves and also manage him only via thieves guild.(like sending him for any raid activity)

A thief should not even be allowed to manages from our Keep . He does not have the respect of a Knight.

Our developers have declined a suggestion to add extra training queues. Here is the main reason:

You will build Units faster, but your rivals will also build them faster. You won't feel any improvements.

I 'll try to put this in a different perspective.

What is the reason in having different building but allowing us to train all the units from Sentry house itself.

What does a Thief doing in a Keep with other units.

My suggestion is to have option to train units from their respective building .

If parallel queues are not possible then, discard that point alone .

Rodeo said:

Rodeo said:

Suggestion:

Sentry House - should allow us to train only Infantry.(in this, different units should be allowed to get trained independent of each other)

Order of Nights - should allow us to train only cavalry.(in this, different units should be allowed to get trained independent of each other)

Council of Mages - should allow us to train only Occult.(in this, different units should be allowed to get trained independent of each other)

Hall of Shadows - should allow us to train only shadows.

A new building for Beasts (suggestion)

Thieves Guild - should allow us to train thieves and also manage him only via thieves guild.(like sending him for any raid activity)

A thief should not even be allowed to manages from our Keep . He does not have the respect of a Knight.

Our developers have declined a suggestion to add extra training queues. Here is the main reason:

You will build Units faster, but your rivals will also build them faster. You won't feel any improvements.

I 'll try to put this in a different perspective.

What is the reason in having different building but allowing us to train all the units from Sentry house itself.

What does a Thief doing in a Keep with other units.

My suggestion is to have option to train units from their respective building .

If parallel queues are not possible then, discard that point alone .

Thief's units, should have an own queue. Doesnt matter if it built in sentry house or wherever. Imho. a lot of units deserves to have own queues rather than be grouped with other units. That way we could speed up army building faster as well.

I would like to see the game give us the option to trade relics and hero gear on the market.  Its luck based what you get and it would be really nice if we could trade our extras for the stuff we need.  

To reduce the risk of alt abuse, they could have quality requirements (eg:  divine rune can only trade for divine rune, blue quality gear can only trade for blue quality gear, etc).  People might still farm alts, but it would make it harder for people to trade garbage to their alts in exchange for the good stuff their alts luck into. 

Any word on when we will be able to edit the Friends list to remove people? It's getting ridiculous now!!  The "Friends" sort on trading is just about worthless because of all the spammed Friend requests.  At least give us a way to see who it is Friending us before we have to accept it? 

No idea who any of these are -- Teammates?? Allies?? Enemies?? Random Strangers!!  I find it really suspicious that apparently there's 8?  jodedor's out there though. I'm getting this every time I log-in or refresh the screen and if you don't accept/deny it lags the game!!

PLEASE FIX THIS!!!

To see their profile please click on their names. 

ThatGuy said:

I would like to see the game give us the option to trade relics and hero gear on the market.  Its luck based what you get and it would be really nice if we could trade our extras for the stuff we need.  

To reduce the risk of alt abuse, they could have quality requirements (eg:  divine rune can only trade for divine rune, blue quality gear can only trade for blue quality gear, etc).  People might still farm alts, but it would make it harder for people to trade garbage to their alts in exchange for the good stuff their alts luck into. 

Hello,

A moderator suggested I put my post here so it could be seen as a suggestion. I will copy and paste what I wrote over in General Discussions.

Reinforcement Spam - Spamming Grand Marshal

This "strategy" is getting quite frustrating and annoying. Players will raid you, then they will have someone else spam your base with 1 archer reinforcements literally 100 times to spam your Grand Marshal report, and push the raid report off the list. This prevents you from seeing who raided you, and seeing the battle report. There should be an option to decline reinforcement from people, or filter out these reports. They are quite frustrating to deal with, and they normally send you a smart-alec message after doing it. It is literally harassment.

This tactic prevents you from seeing who raided you because the person spamming reinforcements is not always the person that raided you, and makes it hard to retaliate.

I would like to see an option to deny reinforcements from people who are not friends, allies, or League members. However, an option to filter out reinforcement reports would be nice too. Anything to stop or discourage this kind of malicious behavior.

jprgg24 said:

In the Contacts list in both the "Enemies" and the "Keep" windows, when one clicks to sort by name, the names are put in alphabetical order but with all the uppercase usernames first and then all the lowercase names. I would suggest not separating by uppercase or lowercase as this is really irrelevant to finding the name that one is looking for. Just do alphabetcial order for all, regardless of whether or not the first letter is in uppercase or lowercase.

"Enemies" window:

http://prntscr.com/bgk686

"Keep" window:

http://prntscr.com/bgk68c

Thank you for this suggestion. May I ask you to give more details? Also I would like to know if other players support this idea.

I think this is a great idea & support it