Всі Категорії

EMs are still SUPER OP

EMs are still SUPER OP

Пошук
28 черв. 2023, 20:5628.06.23
17.09.21
250

EMs are still SUPER OP

So, EM rifels.
The biggest "Rip-off" ever huh?
Yeah I don't think so.
Everybody is complaining about how "EM rifles are rendered useless"
They have not been rendered useless. They are still SUPER OP.
Tell me, what happens if you hit 9.6 out of 10 mechs with a high leveled EM rifle?
The answer? THEY DIE!
There is NO COUNTER for EMs. They kill everything instantly.
So can yall just STOP COMPLAINING YOU 2 NEURONED UH... COMPLAINERS! 


Yeah I don't think so. 

Everybody is complaining about how "EM rifles are rendered useless" 

They have not been rendered useless. They are still SUPER OP. 

Tell me, what happens if you hit 9.6 out of 10 mechs with a high leveled EM rifle? 

The answer? THEY DIE! 


Перегляди
72
Коментарі
43
Коментарі
28 черв. 2023, 21:2428.06.23
17.09.21
250

WHY HAS IT PASTED IT 3 TIMES?!? 

CrystalDrewCommunity Manager
29 черв. 2023, 07:1029.06.23
10.02.23
2031

Hello! It seems like it was some bugs on the forum that created obstacles for you to make a post. Yes, whilst rebalancing EM Rifle, we were aiming to make it remain powerful but more complicated to use. 

29 черв. 2023, 15:5029.06.23
20.06.22
384

Understand that just because you're still devastating bots doesn't mean the weapon is good. You can do that with any weapon within a given grade. Get that through your head.

29 черв. 2023, 15:5229.06.23
20.06.22
384
CrystalDrew

Hello! It seems like it was some bugs on the forum that created obstacles for you to make a post. Yes, whilst rebalancing EM Rifle, we were aiming to make it remain powerful but more complicated to use. 

How about you stop favoring the people that tell you what you wanna hear and recognize the truth right in front of you. You've got a real stupid bias that favors your screw ups and lack of action on them. WAKE UP

29 черв. 2023, 17:0029.06.23
21.03.23
10

Git gud and learn to use em like a pro and stop complaining. Hohoho

29 черв. 2023, 17:0829.06.23
08.07.22
266

BAAB 2023: just because your killing a lot of bots doesn't mean the weopon is good. Lol. What a paradox.

29 черв. 2023, 19:5829.06.23
02.04.22
15
PogsterPlays

WHY HAS IT PASTED IT 3 TIMES?!? 

Their forum is broken, just like their game.

Oh, I understand how you feel, but what you need to understand is players are prone to miss unlike the AI bots, which will hit you even if you are dashing away on a killshot or surge.

And uproar on the forum about rip off. Lets just say you puchased a phone with a feature that you wanted. Within months the producers say that the feature was intended to be in the phone and they remove the feature via software update. Will it bother you, when you purchased the phone for that feature. I dont know if it will bother you, but a normal person who spend their hard earned money will be pissed.

And if you are getting wrecked by high level players thats just because their matchmaking sucks.

30 черв. 2023, 16:0730.06.23
20.06.22
384
N8 _

BAAB 2023: just because your killing a lot of bots doesn't mean the weopon is good. Lol. What a paradox.

What paradox? It's only a paradox if bots are tough. They're not. Bots are cannon fodder.

30 черв. 2023, 21:2030.06.23
05.09.22
204

I have an em rifle, can't hit anyone on mobile. I use a 16 and a 6 and they almost never kill anyone 1 shot. Any weapon is OP on high stars (okay maybe not commons). 

CrystalDrewCommunity Manager
3 лип. 2023, 14:1203.07.23
10.02.23
2031
BAAB

How about you stop favoring the people that tell you what you wanna hear and recognize the truth right in front of you. You've got a real stupid bias that favors your screw ups and lack of action on them. WAKE UP

I'm not denying the negative reaction to this disbalance, but in this case, I highlight that PogsterPlays understood this rebalance in the right way, I mean, what the developers wanted it to be

4 лип. 2023, 21:0204.07.23
4 лип. 2023, 21:15(відредаговано)
20.06.22
384
CrystalDrew

I'm not denying the negative reaction to this disbalance, but in this case, I highlight that PogsterPlays understood this rebalance in the right way, I mean, what the developers wanted it to be

Yes that's what I said. Pog understood the rebalance how you want players to understand it and you favor that. You even called it "the right way". That's the problem.

There isn't a difference between that and denying the negative reaction. Don't try these mental gymnastics on me you're not convincing anybody.

CrystalDrewCommunity Manager
5 лип. 2023, 09:1705.07.23
10.02.23
2031
BAAB

Yes that's what I said. Pog understood the rebalance how you want players to understand it and you favor that. You even called it "the right way". That's the problem.

There isn't a difference between that and denying the negative reaction. Don't try these mental gymnastics on me you're not convincing anybody.

Please don't twist my words. I represent the statement of the company and game developers. If a person got it correctly (I mean in the way the developers intended it to be), I will agree and support it. Besides, I'm not trying to convince anyone - it's up to a player how to react to any changes in the game. 

5 лип. 2023, 15:0205.07.23
5 лип. 2023, 15:15(відредаговано)
20.06.22
384
CrystalDrew

Please don't twist my words. I represent the statement of the company and game developers. If a person got it correctly (I mean in the way the developers intended it to be), I will agree and support it. Besides, I'm not trying to convince anyone - it's up to a player how to react to any changes in the game. 

Well alright how about this? I don't believe I'm twisting a thing. This seems very clearly intended to diminish how the majority of players feel. You're still calling it the correct perspective. Sure you're telling players they can choose how they react but you're still telling them at the same time they have the incorrect reaction by favoring your desired reaction as "correct".  If the company and developers tell you to say some BS like that, tell them to stick it. You're a community manager, you're not just representing the company. You're supposed to be representing the community as well. Your job isn't to be shitty to the community on the developer's behalf, or shouldn't be. I don't wanna hear excuses.

CrystalDrewCommunity Manager
5 лип. 2023, 15:1505.07.23
10.02.23
2031
BAAB

Well alright how about this? I don't believe I'm twisting a thing. This seems very clearly intended to diminish how the majority of players feel. You're still calling it the correct perspective. Sure you're telling players they can choose how they react but you're still telling them at the same time they have the incorrect reaction by favoring your desired reaction as "correct".  If the company and developers tell you to say some BS like that, tell them to stick it. You're a community manager, you're not just representing the company. You're supposed to be representing the community as well. Your job isn't to be shitty to the community on the developer's behalf, or shouldn't be. I don't wanna hear excuses.

It contradicts your own words. Not me nor the developers, nor anyone else from our team has created this post, so I just positively react to the comments written by players.

Once again, I'm not denying the negative reaction to the EM Rifle rebalance. Our team considered it and learned a lot from this case. However, there is nothing we can do with it more than decrease the number of bots equipped with EM Rifle.

5 лип. 2023, 15:2005.07.23
5 лип. 2023, 15:36(відредаговано)
20.06.22
384
CrystalDrew

It contradicts your own words. Not me nor the developers, nor anyone else from our team has created this post, so I just positively react to the comments written by players.

Once again, I'm not denying the negative reaction to the EM Rifle rebalance. Our team considered it and learned a lot from this case. However, there is nothing we can do with it more than decrease the number of bots equipped with EM Rifle.

If not you or anybody from the team created the post, then who did? That's ridiculous, somebody had to. What else is ridiculous is that there's nothing more you can do about it. You made changes already. DO IT AGAIN! Or do you just not want to? Tell me the truth.

CrystalDrewCommunity Manager
5 лип. 2023, 15:3305.07.23
10.02.23
2031
BAAB

If not you or anybody from the team created the post, then who did? That's ridiculous, somebody had to. What else is ridiculous is that there's nothing more you can do about it. You made changes already. DO IT AGAIN! Or do you just not want to? Tell me the truth.

This post is created by PogsterPlays, saying that EM Rifle is still powerful. They described why they think so. I agreed with them as I do think in such a way indeed. Moreover, it was intended by the developers - to make EM Rifle remain powerful. By this statement, I'm not denying a large negative reaction we've received. I understand why this reaction was negative. I understand why you are anxious about this subject. As a Community Manager representing the Community as well, I collected, analyzed, and presented all the negative feedback we received to the developers and the team. As I said before, this experience dramatically impacted our workflow.

But this rebalance didn't come all of a sudden. It was made with the aim as a step of greater changes in the balance and other core features of the game. That's the reason why we did it, that's the reason why we did it in this particular way, and that's the reason why there is no way back. The changes are in progress, and I understand that they are not visible instantly and cause a lot of frustration. Still, if everything goes smoothly, eventually, the game will become better.


5 лип. 2023, 15:4105.07.23
20.06.22
384
CrystalDrew

This post is created by PogsterPlays, saying that EM Rifle is still powerful. They described why they think so. I agreed with them as I do think in such a way indeed. Moreover, it was intended by the developers - to make EM Rifle remain powerful. By this statement, I'm not denying a large negative reaction we've received. I understand why this reaction was negative. I understand why you are anxious about this subject. As a Community Manager representing the Community as well, I collected, analyzed, and presented all the negative feedback we received to the developers and the team. As I said before, this experience dramatically impacted our workflow.

But this rebalance didn't come all of a sudden. It was made with the aim as a step of greater changes in the balance and other core features of the game. That's the reason why we did it, that's the reason why we did it in this particular way, and that's the reason why there is no way back. The changes are in progress, and I understand that they are not visible instantly and cause a lot of frustration. Still, if everything goes smoothly, eventually, the game will become better.


Perhaps there's been some sort of misunderstanding. Of course I know who the OP is. I was talking about your reaction to it. If you're determining what steps you should take in the future, I'd like to have heard that.

6 лип. 2023, 05:5206.07.23
21.01.23
23
RedRaven7

Their forum is broken, just like their game.

Oh, I understand how you feel, but what you need to understand is players are prone to miss unlike the AI bots, which will hit you even if you are dashing away on a killshot or surge.

And uproar on the forum about rip off. Lets just say you puchased a phone with a feature that you wanted. Within months the producers say that the feature was intended to be in the phone and they remove the feature via software update. Will it bother you, when you purchased the phone for that feature. I dont know if it will bother you, but a normal person who spend their hard earned money will be pissed.

And if you are getting wrecked by high level players thats just because their matchmaking sucks.

Maybe you shouldn't have spent so much on a game? It's genuinely greedy if you buy a weapon for the sole purpose that it's OP. If it gets nerfed, it's your fault for spending so much in the first place.

6 лип. 2023, 20:2606.07.23
08.12.22
124
CrystalDrew

Please don't twist my words. I represent the statement of the company and game developers. If a person got it correctly (I mean in the way the developers intended it to be), I will agree and support it. Besides, I'm not trying to convince anyone - it's up to a player how to react to any changes in the game. 

do you say mental exercises like this?? em has nothing to do with it. there's much much more powerful stuff out there without making any effort... but you already know it .. but don't touch the mortar who knows why ... this game is dominated by mortars and, by the smart ones from the low hangar. there are no mental exercises, only demonstrable facts. not your usual and repetitive words.

https://prnt.sc/5G55Ugi48FxW

6 лип. 2023, 20:3006.07.23
08.12.22
124
CrystalDrew

I'm not denying the negative reaction to this disbalance, but in this case, I highlight that PogsterPlays understood this rebalance in the right way, I mean, what the developers wanted it to be

remember, and remind your dear super paid developers, that we spent money on the EM rifle for what it was,, not for what it has become., this still doesn't fit into that coconut head...... ???? for this reason I stopped spending ... sorry friend, but you still don't understand what pissed people off ....