All you did was say that I should add weapons, take away weapons, and say that I was wrong. You criticized my experiences and then said that you were right. I will happily make a tier list with every weapon if you would like.
Most others here seem to indicate that they don't agree with the changes to the EM rifle. You created a graph showing your experiences, have stated your opinion that the changes aren't that significant, and that you think the update balances the game. You are essentially criticizing other's experience, telling them that their opinion is wrong, and suggesting that you are right. How are your actions in these regards any different?
If you want to voice an opposing opinion to what others are saying, suggesting that they are wrong and you are right, you don't get to turn around and get annoyed when others disagree with you and do the same, or you can, that's your right, but I wouldn't expect anyone to take you seriously or with any regard. It just seems like you don't want a discussion at that point, or even to hear anything that is dissenting from your views, but rather just want people to agree with you and tell you as much.
You voiced your opinion and experiences, I asked where you were creating your analyses from, and then stated my opinion and experiences. Am I not allowed to do so? You want to create a graph, fine, I have no issue with that, you are entitled to your own opinion, but it's important to remember that it is just that, your opinion, the same way that my opinion is just mine. I'm just pointing out that a graph of your personal experience is not some indication of fact, it doesn't actually mean that the update balanced the game. Maybe it did for you, and I'm sure there are others who feel the same, but it seems like there is a large number of people who don't agree with that, myself included.