Im affraid you are just more than wrong my unknow friend. :-) 

Railgun has biggest damage per shot, usually you are killed instantly with no warning (free from progress path)

Rocket mortars....if you play open map there is no place to hide...You got killed by mortars or by enemy when you running coverless from mortar rain (free from progress path)

"Disco launchers"....you kill group of enenemies without direct hit, just hit near (not closest) obstacle...ridiculous.

EMs was OPed I agree.  75% DD chance is truly too much. But autoaim was balanced by delay. 

Autoaim was universal method how to play sniper rifles on mobile users against PC users.

Honestly If you had EMs and you faced Railguns, Railguns mostly wins because of lack of delay and biggest one shot damage ;-)

So this wasnt game balncing....You will still facing overranked mechs and weapons and EM nerf made no changes toward this issue. 

Rocket mortars are notoriously overpowered. I've had so many matches where one player will carry the whole match by clearing the field with them, and if you're unfortunate enough to play a match where two players on the opposing team are running them, I just quit the match, and I hate quitting matches, more than just straight up losing a match, but they can just make matches completely unplayable. Javelins also have the ability to one shot mechs, especially with maxed pilots and damage implants.

The fact that it's a legendary weapon that people paid for is the most ridiculous part of nerfing it. People paid for what it was, not what it is now. A lot of people would have stuck with just upgrading the longarm or getting the railgun if they knew they were going to do what they did.

> It's supposed to be a one-shot-kill weapon 

In the real world.  In a game, that just frustrates everyone else.  Even two shots is a bit much in a game with dual-weaponry.  Three is about the minimum that should be available if you want to minimize player dissatisfaction - don't forget, it's not just you playing,some of your opponents AREN'T bots and if they get 1-shotted too often they're going to leave and then all you'll have to play against is bots.

But yes, if you paid for it you should be irritated that you didn't get what you paid for.

totalmente de acuerdo, se dijo lo que tenia que decirse. La verdad que hacen el juego para los que no gastan nada, y lo que mantienen el juego son perjudicados.

BAR GRAGH OF WEAPON EFFECTIVENESS 

Before Update

Em Rifle.          ===============================

Disc Launcher================

Carbines.         ==========

Miniguns.         ============

After Update

Em Rifle.          ===================

Disc Launcher================

Carbines.         ==========

Miniguns.         =================

As you can see, when put in a graph, it is a balancing update. (I know this is subjective but it uses my gameplay, youtubers gameplay, and weopon stats)

> It's supposed to be a one-shot-kill weapon 

In the real world.  In a game, that just frustrates everyone else.  Even two shots is a bit much in a game with dual-weaponry.  Three is about the minimum that should be available if you want to minimize player dissatisfaction - don't forget, it's not just you playing,some of your opponents AREN'T bots and if they get 1-shotted too often they're going to leave and then all you'll have to play against is bots.

But yes, if you paid for it you should be irritated that you didn't get what you paid for.

Effectiveness based on what? What form of analyses are you using? Is this your experiences using the weapons, or your experiences being killed by the weapons? If it's just a "this is how it feels to me" kind of thing, then creating a bar graph doesn't do much. Sure, it puts a visual to your personal experience, but it's not some indication of fact.

My experiences put disc launchers and rocekt mortars higher, even before the update, and drastically more now. Carbines shouldn't even be in consideration because they are just garbage, I don't know how anyone could consider them that close to disc launchers or miniguns. Then in my experience, I would also place javelins above the EM rifle, with the railgun close to it. Arc torrents wouldn't be all that far off either. Ultimately, I'd say I get the most kills with the EM rifle, but I also don't get killed the most by them, I have more issues with disc launchers, mortars, javelins, and arc torrents. For myself, and I'm sure plenty others, this isn't a balancing update, because they either might not be as good with EM rifle or they don't have as many issues with being killed by it, so they don't consider it that highly, and for people who have more issues with other weapons, it's not going to be balancing update, it's going to completely offset the game.

If you have a problem make your own graph.

All you did was say that I should add weapons, take away weapons, and say that I was wrong. You criticized my experiences and then said that you were right. I will happily make a tier list with every weapon if you would like.

Hello! Thank you for sharing your feedback on the latest Update! We will pass your thoughts on to our developers!

We agree that such changes may be pretty painful, but it's a common practice for numerous online games to change their Content to meet the initial expectations of developers. However, we decided to nerf EM Rifle based on the collected feedback for a long time and our analytical data. However, EM Rifle was nerfed, remaining one of the top Weapons in the game, and it's still able to one-shot Mechs. Please, give it some time to prove it's still great for set purposes.

Thats fair. I agree. I agree the weapon can be brutal for other players and a damage reduction would suffice. But the aim assists too?? come on, that was crucial for a weapon with 1 bullet in the mag, plus a delayed shot. I know it's a rough weapon but so are many other weapons as well. Disk launchers and Missile racks(technically isn't a one-shot killer. but It sure feels like it) to name a few. This is all fine for the sake of balance. ( To be real, if they really cared about balance, they would have made a lot more weapons accessible with in-game currency). The sad part is the fact that they had the gun on sale and encouraged us to buy it a few days prior to nerfing it. That feels like a rip-off and is upsetting.

With the riffle's current state, I don't see any reason to use it over the Long Arms which is a normal rarity sniper accessible to all. If we are Paying for a "legendary" sniper exclusive only to real cash payments. we expect it to be significantly better than that which is of an "uncommon" rarity and which is freely accessible. wouldn't you agree?   unfortunately, now it doesn't meet that expectation. 

Hello! Thank you for sharing your feedback on the latest Update! We will pass your thoughts on to our developers!

We agree that such changes may be pretty painful, but it's a common practice for numerous online games to change their Content to meet the initial expectations of developers. However, we decided to nerf EM Rifle based on the collected feedback for a long time and our analytical data. However, EM Rifle was nerfed, remaining one of the top Weapons in the game, and it's still able to one-shot Mechs. Please, give it some time to prove it's still great for set purposes.

Ok that's fair. Maybe people won't listen to me very much but they'll listen to me more than a baby (@Besticio) LOL