
The feature can be seen positive and the reasons can be :
If in a coalition of 100 members have many inactive players is only beneficial for all active members to keep all members as active as possible to have the ability to reach coalition goals and complete coalition missions.
Small coalition are not forced to have a merge if they do not wish to do so.
Keeping a coalition small but with active members can become stronger than a coalition with plenty inactive players.
The game is better played when all members are active and the enjoyment of the rewards can be shared and more easier to reach any targets.
All inactive players who will be kicked for inactivity they will still have their army in Acropolis as when they get kicked their army from Capital or Pantheons will return straight to Acropolis.
Once a player return back to the game can join back the coalition if he chooses to do so.
This can be seen as a positive step towards more active players working together and all those that are inactive being more obvious and more resources to raid from.
elias said:
friends do not worry within 7 days the ELIAS coalition will start from scratch losing everything that has been achieved so far, things of the little activity of the members that compose it nowadays.
Life things ;)
Perdonar mi ironía, mi coalición es joven y pequeña no me gasté ni un euro y no costará volver a comenzar. Lo siento por vosotros que sois casi Top y con inversión de mucho tiempo y dinero.
We feel your pain
After my brother died I lost control of my own coa in the pirate game
The new leader booted everyone - 3 years work wasted
I started with 110 members, now only 10 scholars
HOPELESS
friends do not worry within 7 days the ELIAS coalition will start from scratch losing everything that has been achieved so far, things of the little activity of the members that compose it nowadays.
Life things ;)
Perdonar mi ironía, mi coalición es joven y pequeña no me gasté ni un euro y no costará volver a comenzar. Lo siento por vosotros que sois casi Top y con inversión de mucho tiempo y dinero.
No, I don't know what is better for you. I just say that some time should pass for you to make sure by yourself that nothing horrible happened when this feature was added to the servers.you jsut said nicely with no bad words that we dont know what we want, that you know better for us.. and there is nothing we can do...
thats so wrong lol that i wont began with it...
another lost battle
i guess when you manage to make us leave sparta will be a win for you or game over?
also about fb players not complaining about it, i guess it is like the problem of the guardians and the coa attacks, they had guardians for many months and nothing was said, but in the first day of having guardians in plarium.com, we realised the problem and we came here in the forum to explain the problem and why and what was wrong so its gets sorted as sson as possible...
Marius said:
Hey, Tonaya.
Dimitri here, dropping by while Alina is unavailable.
Please check out the Terms of Use, specifically articles 1 and 5, that should answer your question.
Having seen similar reactions of the Facebook servers when Coalition Activity was introduced, I can assure you that it is not as bad as it might seem at a glance. Facebook players voted it as the best new feature of the year a few months later and I have no doubt once you guys have a chance to test it and see that your Coalitions are not just going to be dissolved overnight, you will enjoy the Coalition Activity rewards a lot more.
i think you didnt understood me at all.
you dont own what you sold.
you sold me 4 years ago option to build coalition,and i bought it,now it is mine,it is not yours,so you dont have what to care about my coalition you already sold to me.will i boot inactive players,or i will wait some to get back from holiday...its my busyness,not yours.you didnt mention any condition about activity when you offered me to buy coalition,so what you want to do is illegal and against the law(i dont know about israel law,maybe its different then the rest of the world)
btw,i do have and build one city on fb server,to educate one moderator about his behavior,so i do know whats going on on fb server,you killed a lot coalitions with that update.
try to listen first time in your life,remove this update from plarium.com
Tonaya
marius, have you read my comments?or are you ignoring them?
i was told recenty that are fb and plarium.com separated motors and not comparable by alina, now you say that they are the same and we ahve to follow thier lead?
i dotn understand, so for some things we have not to comapre when its not convenient to you, but when it is convenient, we have to shut up? (that words were alina, not mine)
it means if i get to hospital for a month i dont have rights? I loose all i worked or even payed in case of being a hedgemon? where does it say in the terms of use, as i dont recall reading anythng like that when i opened the account
elias said:
RIX said:
If there is a coalition with 5 people in it, that is a waste, there is no need.My coalition is a waste?
Each hegemon manages his coalition as he sees fit.
I create my coalition to be able to make tutorials and help people, I do not care what they connect and whether or not they help me whenever I can I will help them.
And now it turns out that that is not profitable and they throw away our work for years, in my case more than 3, to the rubbish bin? not counting the drachmas spent (in my case only drachmas but in other real money).
if only active players remain who will make sieges for the weekly top?
If your coalition comprises of 5 people and you fear that less than 60% of your coalition is active......then you answered your own question my friend.
and to your last comment on this quote, that was the question I am trying to get answered. I believe any coalition with low participation should be disbanded BUT I do not believe that they should delete the accounts and create more pools. DID YOU NOT READ MY RESPONSE?
And of course we appreciate all of your contributions to the game forum. 
Fortuna said:
do you understand the problem? imagine you pay for somethng in game, you go on holidays 15 days and when youare back, palrium decided you are not owrth that units, or bonus or etc that you bought, this is the same,,,,
Again, this rule seems to apply to coalitions that have less than 60% participation, in order to remain active, simply remove a player. If a coalition has 57% active players and face elimination and you have 1 member on vacation for 30 days, why do you have to remove player on vacation? You just have to remove one inactive player that's been gone for a long time and has never communicated with you
Obviously you keep the member that is on holiday because they told you they were and you make a note.
So if I have 50 members inactive, 1 is on holiday and 49 of them have been missing for hundreds of days, why would i remove the guy on holiday????
rix, i understand what you say, but wahts the diference of being in a coa or not? f there are coas is because palrium let them created & paid them but now they ahve ddecided that 15 days is enough time to take from them what they paid...
That is incorrect. If the coalition has less than 60% participation for 14 days the "coalition is removed and inactives turned into pools. We all know that almost every coalition has players inactive for 100,200,300+ days. It is very easy for a coalition to remain alive by removing those inactive players if there is danger of being eliminated. The hegemon and an polemarch can handle this simple task.
I hope you understand what I mean

wow, Red, you should apply to public relations of plarium! (if you like helping with basic theory the game for starters, why don't you do guides for beginners? there is an area called game tutorials) unless you are trying to look good because you aply to be a moderator... ummm
what server did you said you were playing?
I think there is value in incentivizing players and coalitions to be more active, but disagree with the decision to "dismiss/dissolve" coalitions entirely after a period of time being inactive and understand where Tonaya is coming from.
I believe that similarly to the units not being lost due to inactivity as they are stored in the Acropolis, so too a coalition should not be completely lost due to inactivity.