Hi anastasia, thanks for your reply. You say it put some players at a disadvantage. Well, now i explain to you why i disagree with your assessments.
1) Even the players you talking about, could buy with ars, so there can be no disadvantage compared to other players.
2) Now, in this way you again create situations of enormous disadvantage for all non-coiner players, as now none of them will be able to afford to buy any packages at the prices you set. Instead, thanks to the ars, all, really all non-coiner players could compete in the game, as the prices of the packages were also accessible for them. thanks to ars, even players who had never bought a package started buying them. And thus reduce the disadvantage between them and the other players. Now, by eliminating the ars, the disadvantage is once again unbridgeable for them.
So, I think the actual situation of the game is exactly the opposite of your assessment. Not just me, but almost all the sparta players say it, as we are all communicating about this event.
The alternative to ars is to drastically reduce the cost of packages. If not, plarium knows, the game will die for sure. It is clear that the game is already dying, everyone knows it. The introduction of ars again, gave the game a new hope of life. At this point, the question arises as to whether plarium prefers to let the game die definitively, as it is no longer part of his projects. It is the only explanation I can give to this senseless action of plarium and its rambling arguments. Another option is that plarium only wants to favor coiner players. There are no other options. Keep in mind, I'm a coiner, so I'm speaking against my interests and only in the overall interest of the game.
I would like you to answer these two my points of argument which are the answer to your previous argument.
Thank you very much