Sorry man. I'm not reading your stuff any more because you don't seem to get the message. Maybe you should spend more time in the game. You seem to be a forum rat to protect Plarium. Say what you want, facts are clear.
I have data for 6 battles now in two kingdoms and for each battle attack/defence was a draw. Facts prove more than bs.
The title of your post is
"A misjudgement in your new cvc formula. It is flawed."
So I didn't go of topic, though maybe I didn't address the exact point you wanted,So I will now.
In your opening line you wrote.
"First of all congratulations with the new cvc system .It kills of clans who didn't play but just raised their SH. Thanks for that."
The most pertinent being the second sentence."It kills of clans who didn't play but just raised their SH"
The topic of a changed CvC, of which there are many threads, would probably never have risen apart from the fact clans used to win, just by training troops and nothing else.
Though this wasnt against the rules it created a problematic situation.
You were effectively doing the same just raising the stronghold influence as a means of 'winning' and getting your hands on the loot.
You were upset because this ceased to be an option for you.
Though this strategy suited you it would have effectively failed,when there was no where else to go.
Sorry for rattling your cage, and being over active here,(you are probably right).
As far as I am aware, Its an open forum,so players are mostly free to say what they want.
I try to only respond to questions that I think I know the answer to, or that I have an opinion about.
Just because I personally do not have a stronghold doesnt not mean I do not now about them, or what the effects of having one, or not having one mean, or that I dont have an opinion about something.
I do not know where Plarium H.Q. is ,if I wanted employment, I would certainly seek them out and do as you suggested.