Всі Категорії

Update Highlights 2.20

Update Highlights 2.20

Пошук
Коментарі
10 верес. 2020, 16:3910.09.20
10 верес. 2020, 16:40(відредаговано)
18.08.15
41

To all those who say 'give us back the books we used on champions who got nerfed to make it fair'. So when a champion gets buffed, should it be deleted from your account and you reimbursed with a shard you pulled it from? It would be fair.

If Rotos gets nerfed, you get back your books and chickens.

But if Draco gets buffed, Draco is removed from your account and you get an ancient or a sacred you pulled Draco from. 

Sounds fair! Lets to it!

10 верес. 2020, 16:4210.09.20
24
nobody gives you back stuff after nerfs in any game
10 верес. 2020, 16:4310.09.20
26.03.20
2

Wrong ... because the investment is based on the status of the champion if they do it wrong, it is not our problem .... they create champion OK at first.

10 верес. 2020, 16:4410.09.20
6
Duchess was well balanced, why the hell are you guys nerfing her? And this change only makes her useless in Clan Boss, changes absolutely nothing in Arena whatsoever since fights usually don't last for 5 turns anyways, you guys don't have a god damn brain cell among you.
10 верес. 2020, 16:4510.09.20
10 верес. 2020, 16:46(відредаговано)
3
Khorona was very good in PvE but is much weaker now. To nerf void legendary like that is a death sentence to players who paid a lot in void shard. I can't get the reason behind to nerf his meter control as not many ppl used him in arena, or used him but was one shot killed by rotos.
10 верес. 2020, 16:4710.09.20
6

They should atleast give us a way to get the books back using Gems or something, if not for free, it's long overdue. Especially considering how expensive and rare books are in this game.

why so mad said:


To all those who say 'give us back the books we used on champions who got nerfed to make it fair'. So when a champion gets buffed, should it be deleted from your account and you reimbursed with a shard you pulled it from? It would be fair.

If Rotos gets nerfed, you get back your books and chickens.

But if Draco gets buffed, Draco is removed from your account and you get an ancient or a sacred you pulled Draco from. 

Sounds fair! Lets to it!


10 верес. 2020, 16:5210.09.20
24
everybody knew ROTOS IS OP and will be nerfed . dont cry now
10 верес. 2020, 16:5610.09.20
22.02.20
11

why so mad said:


To all those who say 'give us back the books we used on champions who got nerfed to make it fair'. So when a champion gets buffed, should it be deleted from your account and you reimbursed with a shard you pulled it from? It would be fair.

If Rotos gets nerfed, you get back your books and chickens.

But if Draco gets buffed, Draco is removed from your account and you get an ancient or a sacred you pulled Draco from. 

Sounds fair! Lets to it!


You should get back any books spent on champions that were heavily changed, whether it be buff or nerf, then let us decide if we want to use those books again on the updated champion. 
10 верес. 2020, 17:0110.09.20
6
For Serris I would recommend that they just move the decrease attack from her A3 to her A1 and replace the fear debuff with decrease attack, this way, she becomes way more viable in clan boss and not so busted in the Arena. There's atleast some decent counterplay to it. It doesn't seem like these guys understand their own game even one bit. And the Duchess nerf is absurd and stupid beyond reason, it only makes her useless in Clan Boss and doesn't serve any other purpose.

Valkay said:


Plarium Please Reconsider your approach on Dutchess Liltu and Serries


You will notice a pattern in both discord and here that everyone agrees on these two Serries Nerf is usless and Liltu's nerf doesn't address her problem but ruins everyones clan boss and dungeon teams what really needs to be nerfed with her is her shields just reduce her Booked Shields 40%MaxHP Shield on her and another champion to either (25 or 30% instead) or change the champs or how she places the shields that make her harder to kill as for Serries make the reduce defence or atk one of them at least their weak version when used in arena and apply only after the remove debuffs so that there is a change to stop these debuffs at least.

10 верес. 2020, 17:0110.09.20
3

So you’ ve just killed my best champions, so give me back books from Rotos, because now he is not a gold hero, but piece of shirt. RIP the hero who equaled donate and f2p players. Instead you’re improve the hero which is already MVP, as Tormin or Warlord. Nerf Lilit is breaking up my clan boss stratagy, but unkill is still using as well as half year ago. Well done Plarium!!! So we have no new fraction, no new content, no quality improvement of weak hero. But we have great  nerf of available golds and great improvement of Void gold hero in case to players donate as more as they can! Great job! There is no motivation to play in your donated trash.


P.S. RIP my best friend Rotos.
10 верес. 2020, 17:1610.09.20
1

Hi,


Please don't nerf duchess in PvE. Please. You already killed her shield by changing the A1 from additive to multiplicative. In the most intuitive interpretation, the booked A1 should be putting MASSIVE shields out and all it gets is 30% bonus on top of the 10% HP base line. You're talking the difference between an 8K shield, and a 25K shield. (at approx 60K hp). Effectively, the last 3 LEGENDARY BOOKS on Duchess A1 gives an extra 1800 point shield at 60K hp.  THREE BOOKS FOR 1800 HP!!! LUDICROUS!  Just change the talent. Reword it. Do something to not make half the books you put into duchess a waste. and THEN comes an extension to the CD?  Why not Nerf her AOE dmg reduction aura (again) or get rid of it. At least that does something to balance PvP while screwing with CB teams. Clearly her original concept made her Legendary. The continuing changes put that into doubt. Even if her raw skills are strong enough to make her legendary, the lengthy cooldowns put her into the questionably usable category. Duchess is a big part of my team.  It's hard to accept but I may bench her for a Spirithost.


Why are you calling the change to Abbess a buff when she puts herself to sleep? This is a MASSIVE nerf. Even combined with a positive change, it should be highlighted in red. Also what is the point? She isn't so OP that you need to add a self debuff sleep. Quite a foolish choice for an under performing legendary.


It's obvious that you must balance over-performing champions. I'd be very curious to see some developer notes on the reasoning behind a number of the changes (that effect me). I'm sure everyone would appreciate notes on some of the bigger or more surprising changes. What did you see that you want to change from xyz buff or nerf? What expectations do you have for the heroes you change? Obviously the player base will work it out on it's own. That doesn't mean a one or two line note wouldn't help.

Please revert the Duchess change.


Yours in gaming addiction,

ClassicGhola

10 верес. 2020, 17:2410.09.20
1
Why do you do this? How do I get my legendary books back?! This is awful. Stop paying these people!
10 верес. 2020, 17:2510.09.20
18.06.19
5

I agree with you completely. I don’t know what they are doing. But Tormin has been changed soooooo many times it’s crazy


There is no point in pulling shards in this game or bothering to get new champions. They can just change them later anyway. 


Dutchess wasn’t near as good after the first nerf. Now she’s even worse. Ya a Spirit host would be a good replacement 
10 верес. 2020, 17:2710.09.20
04.12.19
11

So this is your "huge" champion rebalance... Dear god we do not have the same definition of this word.

This looks lazy at best.


You didn't address most of the current broken champions issues and didn't really buff any champions either.
Look at Rowan for example, people complained that she has so little def she isn't suitable for any content (she's got good ATK but hits like a noodle). But you only change small numbers to the chances of placing debuff to her skills. And she's a void epic.

This is just an example but it shows that you're completely missing the point for most of these champions.


Dutchess didn't need a nerf.
Warlord didn't need a buff.
Serris isn't nerfed at all.
Rotos changes are decent.
Gruptuk is still uber trash.
And most of the other are meh.


Why are you so afraid to decently buff champs ?
Give them a purpose instead of being vault guards...

10 верес. 2020, 17:3110.09.20
30.06.19
3
So what you’re saying is, you’ve made 0 changes to belanor, a freaking void attack legendary that literally requires you to have ANOTHER LEGENDARY to do anything... placing perfect veil means nothing, you fixed his AI like, that’s cool.... no one uses him without Zavia.... just this oversight alone makes me care about it less... like come on... you think slapping a useless aura is going to do anything most monsters in the game are aoe, where would you throw belanor that would make that even remotely useful.... rediculous
10 верес. 2020, 17:3410.09.20
08.08.19
2

1. Rotos the Lost Groom  - will be just 0   ( -dmg, -block res). Remove this trash extra turn from a1 and leave all another stuff


2. "Madame Serris

Removes all buffs from enemies. Places a 50% [Decrease ATK] debuff and a 60% [Decrease DEF] debuff on all enemies for 2 turns."


Skill with buff remove and place biggest debuff in-game must be separated or debuff for 1 turn. This is epic champ btw....why sethallia so weak?


STOP to smoke!!! if You think this is nerf for epic....

10 верес. 2020, 17:4110.09.20
13

Lol bisthopus Is shit



10 верес. 2020, 17:4710.09.20
16.05.15
4

Cant believe you destroy rotos for CB and also for arena

I have 2 of them fully booked, it costed me a lot of real money


now I will have to buy new champs top replace them, great job Plarium, you will be richer and your players poorer.


duchess is also out of the CB, Why? are you releasing new champs and want more money?


Very Disappointing


10 верес. 2020, 17:5610.09.20
23.07.17
2

Hakkorhn Smashlord


Rallying Bellow


Removes all debuffs from all allies, then places a [Block Debuffs] buff on all allies for 2 turns. 


Why is this in green??? Is The same skill, they don't change anything!!!

10 верес. 2020, 18:0610.09.20
13 верес. 2020, 10:19(відредаговано)
14.06.20
5

I'm relatively new player of RAID and i have Candraphon sitting in my vault, and ill not use him, even after these changes. He is still the same, but lesser garbage. Why he attacks again on his A1 when enemy has buff ??? They should make it when enemy has debuff. His A1 should depend on your team, not enemy team.... And still sitting duck... His A3 makes him still wait for another turn. This guy Candraphon looks like best killer in game, but he is still total garbage. Im upset with plarium TBH. Many rare or epic champs have they own buff with extra turn or they ignore some armor. Not Candraphon...stupid changes. And im not talking about his multipliers which are worse again then most rare/epic champs.

Can Plarium tell me where he will be good, where he is better then rare/epick champs ? 

In PvE ? He will lose turns all the time and his damage is low. Is there worse attack in the game in PVE ?

In PvP ? His kit is still the same generaly. 

IN defense: If enemy boost turnmeter, then debufers/bufers and attackers play. So enemy boost turnmeter and then he gets debufed, but he will be in Perfect vail. So you improved his defensive ability, but he is not usable as attacker anywhere.

In attack: He waits and sits one turn to be able use his selfbuffs and attack an enemy. Then he attack after your team debufed your enemy team, because that is what you do if you want to kill anything. So he attacks one times and do nothing after 2 turns. Did you thought about that or tested you changes ??


First i thought when i saw Rotos and Candraphon will be changed. I was like OK Plarium is smart. They will not nerf Rotos much, to not upset people who invested time and books to make Rotos or other champs generaly.

So i was like OK they will boost counters and boost bad legendary champs to counter OP heroes and make them viable in more ways. (FORCE affinity countering MAGIC affinity - ROTOS)

But you have made Candrpahon joke again, boring not functional hero. Your changes are nice, but not complete.


Give Candraphon, to his A3 ability to Grants an extra turn like many selfbuffing attackers. Why legendary attacker has to wait 1 turn to play?  

Make his A1 extra hit if target has any debufs (Like Fenax for example) so he can hit twice when your team attack and you actualy want to kill something.

How you think Candraphon will be used ? You have to pray that someone in opposite team will buff up, but not with shield or inc def or something and then you want Candraphon to play 2x with his A1 ?? Will he do anything even if he hits twice ? (he will not do anything)

make A1 condition like He attacks 1 more time when his target is debuffed and he attacks 1 more time when taget has any buff. So he would attack one time enemy without buffs and debuffs, two times debuffed enemy, and three times debuffed and buffed enemy which makes sense for legendary attacker who wants to damage something.

or make A1 condition: Attacks 1 enemy. Places an extra hit if the target is under any buff/debuff. If target has any buff he ignores all damage reduction effects and he will ignore 50% taget's defense.


Did you made his AI to chose buffed targets or he will prefer debuffed ? i think you did not :)) These changies are so bad :)) Will he attack damage block buffed enemies ? WTH :))) This is not even funny anymore. You want money from us ? Give us quality...

Btw Fenax is epic champ with 4.1 multiplier on his A1 (attacks twice) and after kill his target cant be revived, while Candraphon (legendary monster) has it 3.0 with stupid condition. :)))))

Please read what your customers are saying and think about it.

Your dear customer.