Not really, though that's just my point of view. 

What should be done depends on the way a weapon has been nerfed, whether its a small one, medium one, or big one, alongside the way it effects gameplay. In case its a rather big change as it means for some players that they need to refit their mech, their pilot, and try a new strategy or new weapon that can be used instead. In some people's cases this means the mods they put effort into getting are now of less use/worth, and in rarer cases the pilots too or even mechs if the players planned around the weapons.

What should've been done (in my opinion) was nerfing some parts of the weapons and then buffing other parts to make up for it, maybe even offering a heavy mod removal discount towards the mods used for these weapons. However if the weapons won't gain some buffs to offset the nerfs, the least that should be done in this case is lowering the grade instead while making upgrading the weapons cheaper.

edit: I don't agree that players should get a big compensation though, but i do think this whole situation with the weapons could've be dealt with better.

And I agree with most of those points. The rebalance could have been made without completely destorying the usefulness of the weapons. The damage should have been increased to keep the average DPS around the same. There should have been an implant removal discount so that players get an option to move their resources to other weapons if they weren't satisfied with the rebalanced weapons. 

The main argument I was making was that while I see a lot of people asking for compensation for nerfed weapons, which is something I find funny because nobody ever argues for the opposite, i.e locking buffed weapons behind a paywall. 

Disclaimer before someone takes any of this out of context: *I* find it hilarious. My opinion does not reflect Plarium's stance on things.

i

Here is my win rate. I'm playing ONLY with DLs and ATs. From my perspective, the rebalance is minor, and it didn't change the effectiveness of these Weapons much. Definitely not 50%. But once again, it's my opinion and my skills, I believe that players may have issues and recommend changing the strategy and tactics

CrystalDrew, your scores in FFA mode are very low, you will never be in the top 3 in the tournament with these scores. Game management is getting worse day by day. If you don't care about losing players, keep it up, congratulations.

Hello! I don't aim to win any Tournament. I play just for fun when I have time apart from my work. Not to boast, but based on my experience and the screenshot, I assume I could win a Tournament hands down. However, I don't have enough time.

Could you please elaborate on your statement about game management? What would you like to change or improve?

And I agree with most of those points. The rebalance could have been made without completely destorying the usefulness of the weapons. The damage should have been increased to keep the average DPS around the same. There should have been an implant removal discount so that players get an option to move their resources to other weapons if they weren't satisfied with the rebalanced weapons. 

The main argument I was making was that while I see a lot of people asking for compensation for nerfed weapons, which is something I find funny because nobody ever argues for the opposite, i.e locking buffed weapons behind a paywall. 

Disclaimer before someone takes any of this out of context: *I* find it hilarious. My opinion does not reflect Plarium's stance on things.

Specifically: "I assume I could win a Tournament hands down" .. with NOMAD & EMBER GUN in low hangar mode (hangar less then 1k or similar) U CAN DO more than 1000 points 4 game WITH ONLY 1 HAND!!

How we can compete with them? 

Counter they?? looooool

Be sure that I don't use tanking and stuff. But note that I don't deny and confirm that this issue exists. We are actively working on it at this moment.

LOL when will you ever hear anyone argue for the purpose to pay more. HAHA, i think your unique to get a laugh out of the idea to fight for the reversed arguement. 

Pilot implants (just running my mouth)

Furthermore, in regards to the implants. You can obviously recognize that these people gameplay developers are not in their position due to skillful design or coding but for the fact they see oppertunities of creating money traps. For example, when creating a second roster or lineup in your hangar. The mechs arent paired with the previous weapon OR pilot, yet the pilots are still paired with the implants. The trap is to encourage different weapon and pilot combo for each lineup because of the tiny amount of acoins you have to spend or lose your pilot marks for a stronger upgrade, and to continue this tiny spend multiple times to wear out your acoin savings so you potent buy more to upgrade your mechs or weapons. They also stimulate the acoin purchase tendency by releasing objectives that require you to upgrade. Wonder why you  have battle points, tickets, fortune coins, and crate rushes? its all to sell sell and 9ii?. . 

(Personal Suggestions/questions, and wtf's)***

#1-in my oppinion, they should abolish the pilot marks, and have your implant quality depicted by the grade of the implant. they already have 3 kinds, and that means all mplants have 3 versions one stronger then the other. 

#2- you should only receive blueprints for the weapons and mechs you have aquired. i have an abundance of surge blueprints but none for onyx. i dont even own surge. 

#3-  please change this $100 average rate of merchandis. Americans are dealing with a bunch of economic issues and $100 is more like $1000 right now. 

#4- can we get a teamchat feature on this beotch im tired of my squad stepping in front of my attacks. sometimes they are the best player on the opponents team.

This game has became a pay to win. They screw over players to force you to purchase overpriced weapons then do this reduction after we figure out what to use to win. No longer buying anything from this game and been leaving 1 star reviews on app sites to inform new users these tactics.