djmoody said:

Just review the log at the start of the thread. It's not about belief, you simply need to review the facts already supplied. There is a major problem, evidence to prove that already provided. All that remains is how long Plarium want to continue to deny the obvious..

Lord djmoody

just to say that log only could be comprensive for those who uses it to trace their bank, although it is one of the clearest i have seen, but i think devs could not find it useful or clear for them to control this possible issue, besides the amounts we use are not the same as really used.

i suppose they do the test tracing the looses with their own logs and if they, using this method, check that all works as intended, then be sure that all works as intended. However, if this possible bug, glitch or error exists then first we have to set in which conditions this error occurs and then say them to try to reproduce and check if really is a bug. meanwhile they couldnt reproduce it or find it if it is so hidden then all works as intended.

remember the famous bug from moscato, how many time it tooks to be reproduced and repaired.

also i want to say i dont know the amounts to bank for levels from 101 to 170 and dont know if really 250M banked are enough for a payout on levels Lord Mark or Lord TheBeast do (170). i think so, but i can talk properly as the moment i dont know that data.

Regards

I got over my BG hump, have taken a different approach and now can turn troops around pretty confidently. Even swapping Off for Def and vice versa by using the BGs to use for what I need at the time and keeping a reserve in to pull out when needed. It is a real troop bank now for me. Then again I stick to BGs under 100, so after that who knows?

One trick I guess is to play the BGs, don't let them play you. Anywho... I am just a small potato in a bigger vat of fries. So take that at face value.

djmoody said:

This is hugely important. I am suprised so few ppl have commented.

I'm aware I'm replying to a old post. But for me BG's are a good chunk of my gameplay. Personally I haven't ran into any issues with battlegrounds and I just recieved a multiplier 2 weeks ago during last 75% off sale. No I did not buy back any troops, since I am a saphless account

 And still recieved a payout with 14mil+ Iron/Gold increase for payouts. 

As the battlegrounds guide tells the public "Be forewarned - these battles may cost you dearly in men and Resources, and a reward is not always guaranteed to the victor.... While may may contain valuable Resource cashes or captured friendly Units - some will offer you nothing but hordes of Enemies and the opportunity to earn Experience Points. If you are victorious and gain nothing - take heart.... Each Battlefield you rid of the Enemy significantly increases your odds of receiving a bonus on your next attempt - so keep trying!"

If you have never read this guide in the game. It use to be different before the new mechanics of ALWAYS gaining a payout. Before this they use to speak of a multiplier, every so on you would game compensation payouts for your loses. From what I have noticed personally even though this is not stated anymore. These Multipliers still do exist. So possibly you just needed more res to hit you multiplier. I have been gaining troops ever since I lost my 36mil O back in october of 2016 to pvp. Only had 400necros from a pvp tourney and a handful of troops from the pvp hit. Since then I have gained back to my orig size of 2016 and gained more troops. Yes it took alot of res and building from raids. And no it did not cost me cash from buying sapphire packages which many do. I played for tourneys and gained maybe 30-40k saphs before the spring experience tourney. I'd keep going at the battlegrounds since I always do with a payout of earning more is always on the horizon. 

Why quoted DJ is because he does make a good point. This is important. Battlegrounds are a huge foundation of big armys and creating these so called "Hammer" strikes. If you feel like you have lost to many troops and not gained your res back, I've been there.... Yes, it REALLY sucks not having a huge army. But sometimes you have to take a step back, build for a month. And then hit your highest battleground and not the one that will give you more points towards your oracle. 

BiohazarD said:

Oracle said:

Stewart_KT1 said:

thefray said:

lol Oracle debunked yet again, anyone keeping score lol

i cant count high enough to keep track of that

Moderators are players, and as such they have differing opinion about game play. These is because moderators have different different personality and believes that affect how they perceive the game and play it. 

Players should know that.

I personally don't think is possible to not spend and score 300K points in Experience within 4 hours( especially taking into account the age of Kabam). But then again, I could be wrong, and I should be accounted to, and my mistakes pointed out.  

It's certainly possible if you're doing high level bgs.  You'd probably end up losing a bunch of troops to the bg tax doing it, but it is doable without spending money if somebody really wants to.

Or you kill a large defensive force..... or your offence runs into a bigger defence than you expected.....

Stewart_KT1 said:

thefray said:

lol Oracle debunked yet again, anyone keeping score lol

i cant count high enough to keep track of that

Moderators are players, and as such they have differing opinion about game play. These is because moderators have different different personality and believes that affect how they perceive the game and play it. 

Players should know that.

I personally don't think is possible to not spend and score 300K points in Experience within 4 hours( especially taking into account the age of Kabam). But then again, I could be wrong, and I should be accounted to, and my mistakes pointed out.  

Stewart_KT1 said:

thefray said:

lol Oracle debunked yet again, anyone keeping score lol

i cant count high enough to keep track of that

Moderators are players, and as such they have differing opinion about game play. These is because moderators have different different personality and believes that affect how they perceive the game and play it. 

Players should know that.

I personally don't think is possible to not spend and score 300K points in Experience within 4 hours( especially taking into account the age of Kabam). But then again, I could be wrong, and I should be accounted to, and my mistakes pointed out.  

lol Oracle debunked yet again, anyone keeping score lol

Well here is my personal experience with BG's.

Hero equipment, wisdom points and rank experience affected the BG's somehow some way.  I'm one of the many who has been affected by this glitch in the BG's.  The bank is a bottomless pit that spits out less than you put in.

Yap, if you are a non coiner. Stay below level 50 BG. Never go up too much. Don’t do BG that need bestiary and occult attacks or reinforcements, unit.

BG are not meant for profit. You want to make a profit, do BG bellow level 11., with a no loss method it's easy to up your army to 50 mil in three years by just doing BG under level 11, every single day a total of 58 BG.

Point about BG. They are not meant to be done everyday. If you have BG that need infantry and you are out of infantry, stop. And build infantry, come back in a few weeks.

There are certain units that are good for BG and some units that are bad for BG. But, there are units that are very good for a non coiner, Pikes and archers are awesome. If you can spend, a decent amount, then building resource heavy units, and buying those boosts at a 70-80 % discount will help.