All Categories

Question

Search
Comments
Jan 27, 2016, 22:3201/27/16
04/07/14
51

Blasphemy said:


Sir Crusher said:


Blasphemy said:


Sir Crusher said:


Can you shut down Blasphemy's thread then as well?  She called Anarchy a name that would be normally starred out had she not used a @ instead of an A.

oh please i don't find much wrong with my post

"Sir Crusher"


oh yeah it was edited to remove the @ wouldn't wanna offend you

You seemed more offended that we relieved you of a beacon...  but that's allowed. :)
not at all, but you keep thinking this is what it's about 
Where did my reply go?

Jan 27, 2016, 22:4201/27/16
06/14/14
101

I will make this short and simple it's a war game do you not share the enemies war tactics is it Test fault KT has such bad war tactics and took it to a whole new level  he should be allowed to say how he feels and to show there war tactics ever how bad they may be. Hi post should not  have been removed if it is ok for kt to say any number of things about Test the same should go for Test.


Jan 29, 2016, 20:2001/29/16
03/27/14
1654
Sir Crusher said:

Blasphemy said:


Sir Crusher said:


Blasphemy said:


Sir Crusher said:


Can you shut down Blasphemy's thread then as well?  She called Anarchy a name that would be normally starred out had she not used a @ instead of an A.

oh please i don't find much wrong with my post

"Sir Crusher"


oh yeah it was edited to remove the @ wouldn't wanna offend you

You seemed more offended that we relieved you of a beacon...  but that's allowed. :)
not at all, but you keep thinking this is what it's about 
Where did my reply go?

don't look at me, drama or "you"  amuses me, i wouldn't delete it
Jan 29, 2016, 19:2001/29/16
231775

a big fraud, at this point many players work with/for plarium..... work for destroy other troops, secret bg  and other mechanisms many top secret but with one purpose= kill best troop

Jan 27, 2016, 20:0901/27/16
03/27/14
1654
Sir Crusher said:

Blasphemy said:

Sir Crusher said:


Can you shut down Blasphemy's thread then as well?  She called Anarchy a name that would be normally starred out had she not used a @ instead of an A.

oh please i don't find much wrong with my post

"Sir Crusher"


oh yeah it was edited to remove the @ wouldn't wanna offend you

You seemed more offended that we relieved you of a beacon...  but that's allowed. :)
not at all, but you keep thinking this is what it's about 
Jan 27, 2016, 19:5701/27/16
Oct 26, 2020, 12:00(edited)
231775

Mehnslayer said:


    Timmy, the post from before was the first I deleted besides spam. I don't think any player should be singled out for any reason, be it true or false it is damaging to the player and in some situations, can affect their self esteem and or mental health, it's not a risk I am willing to take. You can feel free to share your methods, in fact I would encourage it.


If anyone chooses to act they can and will be held accountable for it. It is when there is no proof that it becomes libelous to talk about it. Indeed if you read the ToU that you want to use to justify your action do not state the reason you cited for the record the ToU states "1.2. While free debate and discussion are encouraged, we will not tolerate posts using inappropriate/offensive language or content. Below are guidelines to help determine whether or not certain language is appropriate. There may be inappropriate language that does not fit into any of these categories. We reserve the right to evaluate each incident on a case-by-case basis.


Clear or implied language which:


a. refers to or threatens violence in any capacity that is not directly related to the game world.


b. is rude or offensive in nature, including but not limited to: personal attacks, name calling, cursing/foul language, cyber-bullying, trolling.


c. insultingly refers to other characters, players, or groups of people, be they in-game or external.


d. promotes racial/ethnic/national hatred, alludes to symbols of racial/ethnic/national hatred.


e. refers to sexually explicit topics.


f. negatively refers to any aspect of sexual orientation pertaining to themselves or other players.


g. negatively portrays other page member’s personal religious beliefs or major religious figures.


h. references the performance of illegal activities, including software piracy and other intellectual property violations.


i. excessively communicates the same phrase, similar phrases, or pure gibberish."


The post contained non of the above mentioned items and many posts that KT members have made do contain items mentioned above and were not moderated. Lack of enforcement sets a precedent and that precedent is then a new unwritten rule (see any modern legal system) for whatever reason you have decided to go against precedent set before and want to hide behind the ToU which clearly does not say anything about a player being singled out for actions that have been very clearly documented. In short everyone is accountable for actions that they take and your logic of nobody being singled out has not and is not being enforced and not possible to enforce because by stating an opinion one chooses to single themselves out. Lets have some good old fashioned accountability here. 

Jan 27, 2016, 18:3301/27/16
Jan 27, 2016, 18:35(edited)
06/29/14
302

Mehnslayer said:


Couldn't find anything regarding to the post you mentioned, your post don't "keep" getting deleted, if they do it isn't by me, as for the reasons why... I listed them above, the main point was the attacks on Aaron's credibility, and some other comments which were initially edited due to being personal attacks, no matter how small... It kept coming up, telling people to grow a pair, came up at least 4-5 times. Regardless of how small and insignificant you may thing these are, they are insults non the less and can hurt a person's feelings or upset them. I'm sorry if my judgement upset you however I saw a few people ask me to delete the thread in question and I feel it ran its course, you are more then welcome to continue discussing it, however keep the league banter to leagues not attacking specific players please.

Edit - I saw your edit after my post..... Conduct your diplomacy here, no problem. But attacks on other players and insults to players including defamation is against the rules. 

"the main point was the attacks on Aaron's credibility"

If I'm understanding this correctly, you have the ability to make sure that Aaron's "credibility" is never brought into question.  Good to know.


"some other comments which were initially edited"

To be clear again, because someone makes an inappropriate comment on my thread, the whole thing gets removed, instead of what the forum has always done in the past which was to edit the inappropriate comment.


 "you are more then welcome to continue discussing it, however keep the league banter to leagues not attacking specific players please."

If I really am allowed to continue discussing it like you say, please bring my topic back up so that it can be discussed.
Jan 27, 2016, 18:1001/27/16
Jan 27, 2016, 20:02(edited)
03/27/14
1654

test said:


Blasphemy said:


i dont think he was thinking of coiners as much as he was trying to keep the forum civil 


keep things civil eh?


From the moderator who called me an alt and personally and questioned my credibility, along with allowing personal attacks on me to remain up and talked about. 


posts like:


HOW CAN PLAYERS LIKE "TEST" CONTINUE PLAYING? http://forum.plarium.com/en/stormfall-age-of-war/game-discussion/topics/how-can-players-like--test--continue-playing-/


Yeah, it's pretty convenient how you now want to keep things civil, but back then when I was being grilled and not KT, everything including a post about a personal attack was fair game.

I didn't know u then, that was my wrong, and those who seen i called you an alt in KT the time told me, so when im wrong i do admit it and i apologize 

the name at the time struck me as an alt , 

same time you had very little post then, 



BTW i didnt say i was keeping it civil i said he was, he form is different then me, 

i don't change me tone im 100% me in game and here 

Jan 27, 2016, 17:5501/27/16
06/29/14
302

Blasphemy said:


i dont think he was thinking of coiners as much as he was trying to keep the forum civil 


keep things civil eh?


From the moderator who called me an alt and personally and questioned my credibility, along with allowing personal attacks on me to remain up and talked about. 


posts like:


HOW CAN PLAYERS LIKE "TEST" CONTINUE PLAYING? http://forum.plarium.com/en/stormfall-age-of-war/game-discussion/topics/how-can-players-like--test--continue-playing-/


Yeah, it's pretty convenient how you now want to keep things civil, but back then when I was being grilled and not KT, everything including a post about a personal attack was fair game.
Jan 27, 2016, 17:1701/27/16
03/08/15
43
Back to the question, why remove a thread which has purpose, why not just remove the comments deemed wrong, does that mean if i see a thread i dont like, i just need to write something extremely bad under it and the entire thread will be deleted?
Jan 27, 2016, 17:1501/27/16
Jan 27, 2016, 17:16(edited)
06/29/14
302

Mehnslayer said:


Page not found

That post has been up since July of last year.  I was able to access it and pull a screenshot from it to prove my point, and now the link is magically gone?


What is going on around here?  What kinda BS is this?
Jan 27, 2016, 17:1301/27/16
03/08/15
43
I am a Destiny Captain, and when i brought up the changes in BG battle mechanics, where under-sending could bring up to 15% more killing of troops if you sent the right amount, they said they hadn't changed this, then went on to delete some of my comments. The final solution is why share knowledge when you are lied to and then having your voice removed from comments. Others are allowed to say BG methods which are drastically wrong, and here i am telling proven facts just to have the truth removed.