Trajan said:

Is this 100 point minimum just for coalition position takeover tournaments or does it apply to coalition pvp as well?

youll know thta answer after tourament will be over

Only fair! Those of us who participate deplete our warriors and the burden shouldn't be on the same few. Sort of like the old fable about the chicken that was baking bread and all wanted to help her eat it, but no one wanted to help make it.

Don't they have introduce this because some hegemons would have complained some lazy people wouldn't participate and would just scavenge others' work ?

The forum is just the emerged 10% of the iceberg... So many people are complaining through support tickets you can't even imagine the crowd they represent.

Now two thoughts about this :

- As Killerjim proved, some hegemons are willing to help their members who are too weak to compete, by sharing those coalition rewards.

I think if some other hegemons would be more strict about participation, a choice should be given in the coalition dashboard, rather than this hard coded limitation. It should really be up to each coalition rules.

- Persian positions was especially not the right tournament to amend. Low levels (up to level 20 and more !) only grant 1 point per position !!! 

Beginners just stand no chance at all to compete there.

Maybe it's their way to apologize ? :p

ThatBloke said:

Hundigo said:

I agree with you eviltwin. ThatBloke seems not be able to see the facts and figures anymore.

@ ThatBloke; a lot is going on in the game. From 2 sides;

a) a lot of 'changes' and 'updates' in the game from Plarium side

b) a lot of complains about the 'changes' and 'updates' from players side.

The players has only this forum to ventilate their complains about it. Let them have it. It's up to Plarium to deal with it or to explain more. It's not the task for the moderators.

I agree with your whole last statement ; it's just you don't have to be insulting, and it's just stupid to make responsible people who are totally disconnected from the technical staff.

And you first statement is just a lie and an offense.

Aren't you even able to see you're being rude ?

All I'm doing is trying to understand everybody (Plarium included), while you're only acting as a brainless lynch mob, most of you.

*SNIP*

That's why I'm suspecting a scam here. So yes, the guy who did that to her is a cockroach. Can't you see it's not about me, but about her ? What's there in your eyes ???

I'm not taking it ThatBloke, and I don't have to neither. You as moderator violating every forumrule. 

LOL Martoru ^^

They have to get it right, huh ? :D

thank you Hihachi :-))   but ThatBloke shall never understand it, that's also a fact. 

@ ThatBloke; When you discribe in your post a forum user as " descipable cockroach", just about the use of nickname Ladytrish, then you as moderator has a serious problem.  And not one shall ever learn why you are moderator when such "insults" may be used by a moderator by Plarium. You deleted that post from that forumuser. I'v seen that post, there was nothing wrong with; it just told that you was trowing out as player from 3 different coalitions. Richt or wrong, that isn't the point, it gives you no right to describe that forumuser as a "descipable cockroach", just because of the use of nickname.  And surtenly not when you are a moderator.