and yet you demand respect.

We hold back because of your new position payout system. You must not have like the fact that people started understand the position and we could get troops without have to spend money. You continue to make it more difficult to play without money.

And please explain how you do this update within an hour of the quest finishing?????

How can you just change the rules like that?

And where are the new colonies and where is PVP?????

Ok what about the smaller players that only get 1 or 2 points per fight  how is it fair to them . Its going to run them off and no new players means the game dies .

I think id find a way to bring them more in the game. 

Let us be clear. Nobody is being forced to do Positions. If any Archon does not want to do them, then that is his/her choice. With the old coalition missions there were members who did not contribute but who still enjoyed the rewards. This was not fair on the members who put the work in. Now the system is fair. If you want to reap the rewards then you have to do your part. If you think the rewards are not worth it or if you don't want to do positions then do nothing and you will get what you have earned....nothing.

Atleast Moderators should avoid open lies in a forum. In previous coalition tournaments - "one had to contribute atleast 1 point to reap the prize", it was never "all coalition member will be rewarded even if they have not contributed any point".

The new system is ridiculus, kind of dictatorship & hard & fast rules.

Like i said i have smaller players  (mainly what makes up our coal ) That did the tournament that could not get 100 points no matter how hard they try due to the low amount of points given to them for there fights . That got nothing even tho they tried . 

What about them ? 

This is not about me I can get the 100 points but I want to know what about our lvl 35s and below that have a hard time making a few points let enough 100 

Let us be clear. Nobody is being forced to do Positions. If any Archon does not want to do them, then that is his/her choice. With the old coalition missions there were members who did not contribute but who still enjoyed the rewards. This was not fair on the members who put the work in. Now the system is fair. If you want to reap the rewards then you have to do your part. If you think the rewards are not worth it or if you don't want to do positions then do nothing and you will get what you have earned....nothing.

I agree with you eviltwin. ThatBloke seems not be able to see the facts and figures anymore. 

@ ThatBloke; a lot is going on in the game. From 2 sides;

a) a lot of 'changes' and 'updates' in the game  from Plarium side

b) a lot of complains about the 'changes' and 'updates' from players side. 

The players has only this forum to ventilate their complains about it. Let them have it. It's up to Plarium to deal with it or to explain more. It's not the task for the moderators. 

hihachi said:

thatbloke 

our problem is not the 100 points , its easy to got after week of playing 

but  you changes the rules before the event ends  in 1 hour , cant you see ? this is our problem 

btw i got +1000 points so its not about me but what you did is wrong 

thank you 

Yes, I totally agree with you.

However, it was probably more a goof than purposedly timed.

I've noticed all the games are not synchronized regarding events times, so maybe they made a general update and we got caught in the process. Remember I fell victim of it as well.

Anyway, even if you're right to protest about it, maybe you're just overinterpreting their intentions.

I just dont know, and i'm just like any of you : I'd really like to see admins answer some complaints and either explain, or even apologize... :(

In our current case, it wouldn't hurt.

Hundigo said:

I agree with you eviltwin. ThatBloke seems not be able to see the facts and figures anymore.

@ ThatBloke; a lot is going on in the game. From 2 sides;

a) a lot of 'changes' and 'updates' in the game from Plarium side

b) a lot of complains about the 'changes' and 'updates' from players side.

The players has only this forum to ventilate their complains about it. Let them have it. It's up to Plarium to deal with it or to explain more. It's not the task for the moderators.

I agree with your whole last statement ; it's just you don't have to be insulting, and it's just stupid to make responsible people who are totally disconnected from the technical staff.

And you first statement is just a lie and an offense.

Aren't you even able to see you're being rude ?

All I'm doing is trying to understand everybody (Plarium included), while you're only acting as a brainless lynch mob, most of you.

@ EVILTWIN > I'm sorry you just happened to be the one who got answered to the offense,

You're not the innocent person you're faking to be either. For instance, you purposedly took  part of what I wrote out of context :

EvilTwin said:

and you did say " So maybe it's not really a problem ?' in regards to the changes 

While I explicitely wrote it wasn't a problem IF THE PLAYER WAS NOT IN A COALITION !

Are you going on lying like that ? Can't you see it's your dishonest methods that made me talk to you like that ???

Hundigo said:

Richt or wrong, that isn't the point, it gives you no right to describe that forumuser as a "descipable cockroach", just because of the use of nickname.  And surtenly not when you are a moderator. 

And here you're going on lying again.

Someone creating an account only to usurp someone else's name is cetainly not a forum user, and even less a player.

If it's the case, it would only be a scam, and LadyTrish will certainly have a similar opinion about someone writing under her name. What would YOU think if someone did that to you, huh ?

On the other hand, if she's the one who wrote that, then as I said, either we're going on telling our lives on the forum (which is not supposed to be made for that), or we explain in private first, because either she's shamefully lying and forging, or someone told her crap, and she should also react accordingly.

Now if I had to explain in public, then some people (though as far as I may know, the two of them have been gone for a long time and the third one is just a complete forgery) won't end up honored with the facts, so yes, I'd rather keep this private. Lots of people could testify about these two people deeds, and though it would be funny (as they're totally nuts indeed), it would just not be the place for this. Unfortunately for the liers, not all of the players from this period are gone, and they would have LOTS to say... Too bad !

But actually, the text looks too much similar to the one I censored already several months ago, so I suspect she's not responsible for it.

That's why I'm suspecting a scam here. So yes, the guy who did that to her is a cockroach. Can't you see it's not about me, but about her ? What's there in your eyes ???

Blah blah blah, spam spam spam. Please go buy a life.

Please Just make the effort to read and understand what I'm writing and get done with it.

The reason why i'm writing a lot is i'm trying to make things clear, but I see it's useless once you've decided not to understand and follow you imagination instead.

on monday, it will be bye bye ThatBloke :-)

Never forget your own forumrules, never !

OK, I so take you decided NOT to read what Im writing, and NOT to try and undesrtand anything ? And to go on living in your imaginary world ?

Maybe I should actually wish you goodbye right now, actually. :)

i'm still on the good side of the eject button, you know. ;)

it was probably more a goof than purposedly timed.

I've noticed all the games are not synchronized regarding events times, so maybe they made a general update and we got caught in the process.

Its a fair idea in essence to combat coalition members who never contribute to any missions at all. 

But as said, what about new players. Also, is it fair to players who make high contribution in some missions, but not in a certain other, those people may choose to miss persian mission to save troop for pvp, or they could be busy that day, or they may just decide not to participate one mission for some other reason. 

There is already an avalanche of quests/missions/tasks etc that have turned from fun into a chore. Previous response to the overkill was something like 'you don't have to participate in all of them'. Well, this now seems like an attempt to force participation rather than a choice. 

Im not here to fight with anyone im here for my lower lvls  , My coal might not be the biggest or best but fair is fair and they did try. I think the scoring should be adjusted or lowered for them . 

I stand up for my lower lvls and i do not want to see them drove out .

 I do think that if you do not try you should not gain from it but they did try . I and my coal enjoy helping the newer players and i always will as long as im here . 

thatbloke I have been there done that in a final motive game bro ... No matter how hard you try you will be wrong in the players eye you are part of the company. That i learned the hard way 

I just think that 100 points is to much for them and a few of our newer players want to walk away over the timing of there change . We need to keep and bring new players to the game if it is to stay alive . 

Just think on that is all 

Trajan said:

Is this 100 point minimum just for coalition position takeover tournaments or does it apply to coalition pvp as well?

youll know thta answer after tourament will be over