
in all Actuality, i dont think this Change would be possible.
in Theory, sure. it Really is a Great Idea.
however, the Reality of the Situation is there are Commanders out there who have 1,000,000,000 Garudas. you can Beleive they have been Fully Negotiated, they've Finished the Info War Cypher for the Bonus +10% Offense/Defense, and they'll Wipe out Everything Collectivly From All of your Combine and "Might" Lose 100. Maybe. Doubtfull.
point Being: if this Person OCC's you. that would Actualy kind of put a sort of "game over" on certain Players. and that would start hurting the Player base. which makes if a Very Risky Buisnes to Start Dabbling in.
he cant Raid or Fire Missiles until he breaks the OCCing Army off of him. but him and his whole combine and all of his combine's Allies togeather couldnt break this guy off of him if he has decided that he's here to stay.
what can the Commander that is being OCC'd do about it in this case? as is, he's Pretty much "Done". hes going to be completely Cut off from like Half of his Priority Missions, he cant bring RESOURCES in becuase he cant RAID anymore. and the amount of resources that can be shaved off an annex should be GREATLY increased, because right now collecting a full batch from all x3 100/h annexes isnt really worth the time it takes to get to it through the headqurters.
in all Actuality, i dont think this Change would be possible.
in Theory, sure. it Really is a Great Idea.
however, the Reality of the Situation is there are Commanders out there who have 1,000,000,000 Garudas. you can Beleive they have been Fully Negotiated, they've Finished the Info War Cypher for the Bonus +10% Offense/Defense, and they'll Wipe out Everything Collectivly From All of your Combine and "Might" Lose 100. Maybe. Doubtfull.
point Being: if this Person OCC's you. that would Actualy kind of put a sort of "game over" on certain Players. and that would start hurting the Player base. which makes if a Very Risky Buisnes to Start Dabbling in.
he cant Raid or Fire Missiles until he breaks the OCCing Army off of him. but him and his whole combine and all of his combine's Allies togeather couldnt break this guy off of him if he has decided that he's here to stay.
what can the Commander that is being OCC'd do about it in this case? as is, he's Pretty much "Done". hes going to be completely Cut off from like Half of his Priority Missions, he cant bring RESOURCES in becuase he cant RAID anymore. and the amount of resources that can be shaved off an annex should be GREATLY increased, because right now collecting a full batch from all x3 100/h annexes isnt really worth the time it takes to get to it through the headqurters.
You gave the answers already Commander and thats why Devs decided to keep it the way it is :)
the Only Players who would have a Problem with this Change are the Players who CAN'T fight their own Battles.
i understand, the Development team is Busy right now, and Can't implement this Kind of Change Right now.
We can Still be Talking about though. if Enough of the Player base gets in on the Conversation and the Opions of them are Herd. im sure the Deelopment team will see we Unaniomusly Agree this should change.
i mean, think about it. what is ACTUALLY happening when you Occupie a Base?
your Offense Goes in and Kill off any Defensive Capability the Base has and "Takes Control" of the Base. then you send Defensive Units in to HOLD it.
Underlined Word Being "Control"...
so with this Commander NO LONGER having "Control" of their Base, why are they STILL able to Engage targets OUTSIDE of their Base? Did the Enemy Units just kind of "FALL ASLEEP" While being Stationed at this "Occupation"?
"they all just Kind of Step aside and Let a Battalion of Tanks just Roll right on By... "bye Guys, see you when you Get back *Waves* We'll have a BBQ, Roast some Smoars.. all that, Right?
that is the ODDESTS Occipation ive EVER herd of...
No it's about those who are still occupied can still send out nukes and raids that is what must be dealt with in order to make the game more fair and balanced
Commander, I'm glad that you feel free to share your thoughts and suggestions. As was mentioned earlier, this is an attractive idea, and I personally see what you have in mind. However, unfortunately, our team is currently unable to take on this particular project as it is engaged in other important tasks. In addition, such vivid changes can cause a negative reaction from a certain group of players, which is why the team is not ready to implement it in the near future, Commander. Thanks for your input! 💪
well after reading the comments I have to say what a Great Idea By Chris and as Shaun said you have my vote I agree Chris you have my vote as well I really like that Idea of not being able to raid / Nuke/ or Do Locations once you are Occupied and I also agree that it will make the Game more Balanced as I also have seen these type of players take advantage and abuse the system to suite them self's it's easy to sit back as Chris said and send out raids or nukes in order for someone to come along and liberate , his or her's base because A they don't want to lose troops them self's or B they rather sit back and watch others lose troops I call those type of players weak . My point here is if you can't liberate yourself because you have caused an issue between you and the Occupier than you should fight your own battles rather getting others to do your dirty work Stop hiding behind an Occupy and get your hands dirty for a change . So I too vote for no raids / No Nukes and No Locations once you are Occupied ........👍👍😀
Thanks for your reaction Commander!!!
well after reading the comments I have to say what a Great Idea By Chris and as Shaun said you have my vote I agree Chris you have my vote as well I really like that Idea of not being able to raid / Nuke/ or Do Locations once you are Occupied and I also agree that it will make the Game more Balanced as I also have seen these type of players take advantage and abuse the system to suite them self's it's easy to sit back as Chris said and send out raids or nukes in order for someone to come along and liberate , his or her's base because A they don't want to lose troops them self's or B they rather sit back and watch others lose troops I call those type of players weak . My point here is if you can't liberate yourself because you have caused an issue between you and the Occupier than you should fight your own battles rather getting others to do your dirty work Stop hiding behind an Occupy and get your hands dirty for a change . So I too vote for no raids / No Nukes and No Locations once you are Occupied ........👍👍😀