Worst possible response... lol 

Worst possible response... lol 

The prudent response from a business perspective.  None of the other Raid Integrations (such as HH & RSLH)   are Officially Endorsed.  

RodolBot’s developer states: "It only reads what RAID already shows on screen, and clicks the same buttons you'd click yourself. Nothing the bot does is something you couldn't do by hand."

However, the more important question is how the prediction and simulation side actually works. The information visible on the screen alone does not appear to be sufficient to reliably predict certain Hydra events, such as when a specific champion will receive the mark or be devoured. Those predictions seem to require a much deeper understanding of the underlying game logic, hidden calculations, or additional data that is not directly displayed to the player.

The automation itself is not the most interesting part here the real question is how the tool is able to reproduce and predict the game's internal behavior with such accuracy. 

Third-party combat bots are damaging fair competition – Plarium needs to act

Hello Plarium,

I would like to raise a serious concern about third-party automation tools being used in RAID, particularly in Hydra and Chimera.

I am not talking about simple tools that help players manage their accounts. I am talking about bots that actively control battles, select skills, evaluate conditions, restart unsuccessful attempts and repeat this process for hours until the desired result is achieved.

Some players can simply start such software and let it optimize their results automatically, while others spend their own time developing strategies and playing these battles.

This creates a serious competitive imbalance.

In Chimera, consistently obtaining the maximum rewards means a steady supply of valuable Mythical Relic Materials. Over months and years, these advantages accumulate. Better Relics eventually influence other competitive areas, including Live Arena.

The same applies to Hydra, where automated optimization can significantly improve results without requiring the player to perform every attempt manually.

Plarium has already addressed the risks of third-party programs that interfere with game mechanics in its October 16 RAID Digest.

My question is simple:

Why should players who follow the rules be disadvantaged against those who automate entire battles through external services?

I believe Plarium should:

1. Clearly distinguish legitimate assistance tools from software that independently controls and optimizes battles.
2. Explicitly clarify whether conditional combat automation violates the Terms of Service.
3. Actively investigate the use of prohibited automation.
4. Introduce and consistently enforce appropriate penalties, including permanent bans for serious or repeated violations.

This is not about targeting individual players. It is about protecting fair competition for everyone.

I have no problem losing against someone who has better Champions, stronger equipment, more experience or a better strategy. That is part of the game.

But competing against accounts that potentially gain months or years of additional rewards through automated third-party software is an entirely different matter.

Plarium has introduced its own Instant Battle features. There should be a clear and enforceable boundary between official in-game automation and external programs that make decisions and repeatedly optimize battles.

I would appreciate a direct response from Plarium about its plans to address this issue.

Fair competition should reward player effort, strategy and account development – not access to the most powerful third-party bot.

Lightning