Matchmaking is based on the scores of the previous CvC.

First thx for answer. But second i need to be sure that i have correct understand.

So if our clan earn (for example) 500k points in previous CvC than, to the next, will be matched with clan who got similar amount in previous CvC? Correct?

If correct, than another question: There are two types of CvC. With and without personal rewards. Are they counted together to mathing or separatly (mean match separatly with and without personal rewards)

It seems that answer may change our tactics :DD

Your assumption is correct, the matching is based on prior cvc whether PR or not.  So the clan you are facing likely deliberately "sandbagged" the last CvC (non-PR) to gain a more advantageous PR opponent.

Your assumption is correct, the matching is based on prior cvc whether PR or not.  So the clan you are facing likely deliberately "sandbagged" the last CvC (non-PR) to gain a more advantageous PR opponent.

Matchmaking is based on the scores of the previous CvC.

Hi again.

last time You answered my question so hope this time will be same. IDK how to call for @trips but he also answered :D

I dont want to make tew thread so will ask here:

What for are counters on live arena battle? 60 seconds - oponent didnt choose and i still wait another 20 - 30 sec. Should't oppenent be kick off and loose? A little bit respect for another player time is too much? 

Hi again.

last time You answered my question so hope this time will be same. IDK how to call for @trips but he also answered :D

I dont want to make tew thread so will ask here:

What for are counters on live arena battle? 60 seconds - oponent didnt choose and i still wait another 20 - 30 sec. Should't oppenent be kick off and loose? A little bit respect for another player time is too much? 

No need to call, the omniscient and omnipotent one is here.

Yes, they need to do something to address the time issue. Multiple ideas have been thrown out there, the cumulative chess clock being best imo.

Cumulative clock wouldn't be bad.  IMO though if the game auto picks champs twice in a row or two active turns in the fight should be an auto forfeit.  Need to start actively punishing these people. 

Again thanks for answering :)

Im fully agree. But got another tip: If you dont respect other player time the game will choose for you... weakest champion wich you have. I think no one have only legendary or mytical. So you past the time? OK no problem the game will put your weakest champs if you can't choose.

Again thanks for answering :)

Im fully agree. But got another tip: If you dont respect other player time the game will choose for you... weakest champion wich you have. I think no one have only legendary or mytical. So you past the time? OK no problem the game will put your weakest champs if you can't choose.

I like it.  Sick of people wasting my time in LA.

Seems I'm not only person who like it :D

Still IDK how to "call" someone here :D but there are at least 3 of us :D and @MooredRat  have a nice modification of my idea :D (ok "calling" = @+nick i see :P 

Now how to do this so devs read this ideas? :DDD (and maby answer :P)

The mods, like Shorty, pass along suggestions to the devs

We do try. 

@ShortOnSkillz  @dthorne04  One little rectification. I got a situation. I want to choose my champs but... bug? I can't. The time went off and game choose for me :/ I give up a fight. I just wont be able to choose. I click and nothing happens...

That might explain some situation. 

with the caveat that siege is inherently buggy at times - have you updated your game?