All Categories

MAJOR ACCOUNT HACKED

Search
Comments
Sep 22, 2017, 18:2709/22/17
06/13/14
104
Oracle said:

Gadheras said:

Well, that would also roll back the sapphire state of players, and all transactions done since, need to be rolled back too. A roll back is more complex than you would think. If they chose to reinburse the units lost at their fortress, they would need to reinburse the attackers as well.

Only the affected parties data will be reset. Its not a server roll back but a niche roll back that I am proposing. 

These is an act of hacking, and not cracking and is severe and lalicious. If plarium decide to do server roll back without affecting in game purchases, they are welcome too. 

As I have said top leagues have agreed to these, and Plarium must feel free to consider ANY action that will resolve these issue. 

A complete server roll back is fine, even if it doesn't affect in-game purchases.  Should Plarium wish to deal with these per player also fine. 

I was letting Plarium know that the MAJORITY of players are willing to work with plarium to solve these issue and make our game a better place. And they should not be deterred in any ways from doing what IS RIGHT. 

hacking ... cracking ..... you really do not have a clue of what you are talking about do you
Sep 22, 2017, 18:2609/22/17
07/11/13
192
Oracle said:

djmoody said:

You are so full of shit sometimes. Where do you get off making a statement like that. You have polled them all have you. Or are you taking just that from the bias and alt posts in this thread?

I don't particularly care what happens but I have to call out blatant BS when it makes me choke as I read it.

It will end up being a simple financial decision based on the perceived value of Emps spending in game and the chance, as Plarium see it, that the players really will quit if they don't get their own way.

Personally (so you can add my feedback to your mythical poll)......

The gravity of the situation warrant these. KoK is yet to be polled. But given the gravity of the situation KoK is likely to sign. You can spend some time conducting these poll and getting to know your player Mr Captain instead of using using precious time to kick a dog while its down. Whether or not you disagree with KoK signing, no one care. I personally don't give a fart. 

awaiting my mail from you :)
Sep 22, 2017, 18:2409/22/17
Sep 22, 2017, 18:27(edited)
231777

djmoody said:

You are so full of shit sometimes. Where do you get off making a statement like that. You have polled them all have you. Or are you taking just that from the bias and alt posts in this thread?

I don't particularly care what happens but I have to call out blatant BS when it makes me choke as I read it.

It will end up being a simple financial decision based on the perceived value of Emps spending in game and the chance, as Plarium see it, that the players really will quit if they don't get their own way.

Personally (so you can add my feedback to your mythical poll)......

The gravity of the situation warrant these. KoK is yet to be polled. But given the gravity of the situation KoK is likely to sign. You can spend some time conducting these poll and getting to know your player Mr Captain instead of using precious time to kick a dog while its down. Whether or not you disagree with KoK signing, no one care. I personally don't give a fart. 

Sep 22, 2017, 18:2309/22/17
06/13/14
104

Oracle said:


Sergey Kryvorotchenko said:


Hello, Lords and Ladies!


First of all, please pay attention that from company side we do our best to secure the game from hackers' attacks as we have a strong protection against outside interference. That means no-one can hack your account without knowing the password/login combination. But still, the security of your social network account and Plarium.com account is the sole responsibility of you as the account holder. Please, don't share your login or password with anyone, don't follow suspicious links and don't use third-party services, which require your account details.


Let me share some quotes from our Terms of Use and Security Policy.


TERMS OF USE, 3.Use of the Service (d):

"You are responsible for all activities that occur under your Account. You may not share your Account or password with anyone, and you agree to (A) notify Plarium immediately of any unauthorized use of your password or any other breach of security; and (B) exit from your Account at the end of each session."


Security Policy: https://plariumsupport.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/115002370429-Security-Policy


And as for the situation that has arisen. Unfortunately, MAD FRENZIE was really hacked.


There's an investigation going on. I’ll keep you informed. 

Let it be knows that the majority of players are willing to have the game session reset. A roll back to the time before Frenzie was hacked has been agreed to by many major and minor leagues. And most of the leagues in top ten support these roll back. 

So Plarium is free to consider these option as a solution. 

Where did you get this info???!!!!???? You stating something does not make it true.


As far as i understand it her e-mail has been hacked. Well i'm sorry but that is not Plarium responsibility!

People should be more careful about their online security.


There is also this:

The security of your social network account and Plarium.com account is the sole responsibility of you as the account holder. Please, don't share your login or password with anyone, don't follow suspicious links and don't use third-party services, which require your account details.



Sep 22, 2017, 18:2209/22/17
231777

Jezebel said:


Trentos said:


Yeah for you Gaderas, this might be normal. That's the difference between you and me. 

As for Jezebel, all know an act like this would be something you'd want in on. I don't have to defend myself. People all over the server are questioning how you were involved. Your posts trying to justify this low act are farked up to say the least

I wanted in on softening Emps Fortress - so what does that mean?  Emps hit my former league and my current league so big deal


Everyone knows Emps intended mass destruction on the server after the last of their beacons went down so the next viable move would be to take down their fortress ... do I have past interaction with Emps which would give me a reason to have my league sacrifice 500 mil offense to soften that fortress?


again anything else that may or may not have transpired I have no knowledge of so keep questioning - if someone broke rules and TOS Emps and Unforgivens are the last leagues that should be accusing anyone 


retaliating for hits on leagues I have been in is a low act?  I would say I have as much reason as anyone to hit Emps .... so I did 

You didnt question the timing?
You didnt question the leadershipchange, the massive drop in members from emps?
Are you really this stupid Jez?

You helped and participated with a cheat, a hack, a criminal offence ....

The only words that should be coming out of your mouth are "I am sorry!"

Sep 22, 2017, 18:1609/22/17
231777

Gadheras said:

Well, that would also roll back the sapphire state of players, and all transactions done since, need to be rolled back too. A roll back is more complex than you would think. If they chose to reinburse the units lost at their fortress, they would need to reinburse the attackers as well.

Only the affected parties data will be reset. Its not a server roll back but a niche roll back that I am proposing. 

These is an act of hacking, and not cracking and is severe and lalicious. If plarium decide to do server roll back without affecting in game purchases, they are welcome too. 

As I have said top leagues have agreed to these, and Plarium must feel free to consider ANY action that will resolve these issue. 

A complete server roll back is fine, even if it doesn't affect in-game purchases.  Should Plarium wish to deal with these per player also fine. 

I was letting Plarium know that the MAJORITY of players are willing to work with plarium to solve these issue and make our game a better place. And they should not be deterred in any ways from doing what IS RIGHT. 

Sep 22, 2017, 18:1309/22/17
06/13/14
104
Talon said:

If plarium does nothing, today is the day the game starts to die.  Plain and simple.  All those involved who accused Emperors of destroying the game should look in the mirror. 
The game is dying for a long time now
Sep 22, 2017, 18:0609/22/17
231777
Oracle said:

Sergey Kryvorotchenko said:


Hello, Lords and Ladies!


First of all, please pay attention that from company side we do our best to secure the game from hackers' attacks as we have a strong protection against outside interference. That means no-one can hack your account without knowing the password/login combination. But still, the security of your social network account and Plarium.com account is the sole responsibility of you as the account holder. Please, don't share your login or password with anyone, don't follow suspicious links and don't use third-party services, which require your account details.


Let me share some quotes from our Terms of Use and Security Policy.


TERMS OF USE, 3.Use of the Service (d):

"You are responsible for all activities that occur under your Account. You may not share your Account or password with anyone, and you agree to (A) notify Plarium immediately of any unauthorized use of your password or any other breach of security; and (B) exit from your Account at the end of each session."


Security Policy: https://plariumsupport.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/115002370429-Security-Policy


And as for the situation that has arisen. Unfortunately, MAD FRENZIE was really hacked.


There's an investigation going on. I’ll keep you informed. 

Let it be knows that the majority of players are willing to have the game session reset. A roll back to the time before Frenzie was hacked has been agreed to by many major and minor leagues. And most of the leagues in top ten support these roll back. 

So Plarium is free to consider these option as a solution. 

Well, that would also roll back the sapphire state of players, and all transactions done since, need to be rolled back too. A roll back is more complex than you would think. If they chose to reinburse the units lost at their fortress, they would need to reinburse the attackers as well.
The topic is locked. You cannot post comments.