BiohazarD said:

scarlet said:

for everyone asking about screenshots, here you go.

http://i.imgur.com/CsyfBxX.png

http://i.imgur.com/7uTJdcQ.png

Wow, that's a lot of archers.  Somehow I get the feeling he didn't build 2 million archers himself on 1 account...

Exactly. It is a blatant display of a user spending a LOT of money on 3rd party sites. The evidence is there and quite simply obtained by Plarium, but nothing will ever be done about it.

Stewart_KT1 said:

Yowzer. That is  a butload of archers.

TNX for the screen

I am rather shocked that it is a member of KT, in S2 who is engaging in these dangerous and illicit behaviour. I would like to honour you with the privilege, as a Captain of KT in S1 to report these issue to support. They will take you even more serious that me. 

Gadheras said:

BiohazarD said:

Gadheras said:

Stormfall said:

Gadheras said:

Well, remove all inactives, clear out bots. Leaves a map of active players to interact with each other. Condense the map to bring all closer together. Let the carnage start. fun times...

If I am not mistaken after 21 months of playing this game you have 131k off and 18k def points. Your call for more pvp seems silly. You know no one is stopping you from pvping right now?

Frequency of pvp and units you willing to lose/risk. My last rather big one, cost me several months worth of unit build time, or if I rathed wanted to go to revive them in the market well over 100k sapphires. Which I don't want to sink into this game tbh. Doesn't change the fact I think the game need to be condensed and move active players closer together rather than wide range of desolate space.  People crying about need the inactive castles to raid for resources, make the game feel little more than farmville.

Well travel time to any beacon/fortress/hamlet on the map is limited to one hour, so the size of the map isn't really that important.  I'd rather have easy castles to raid for res so I can build troops to fight when I want to fight than be crammed into a tiny map with only active players and no way to build troops without spending money. 

Its never about resources its about time it take to build units tbh, you can have full queus going for weeks. It take the time it does. Its poor game mechanic from Plariums side to use "dead/inactive castles and bots" as resource farms and content. 

so do you raid actives or inactives for resources????  personally it took a long time for me to scout out my inactive castles in my area, i like where i am and don't want to compete with the entire server for resources

Stewart_KT1 said:

Yowzer. That is  a butload of archers.

TNX for the screen

I am rather shocked that it is a member of KT, in S2 who is engaging in these dangerous and illicit behaviour. I would like to honour you with the privilege, as a Captain of KT in S1 to report these issue to support. They will take you even more serious that me. 

Here is the link

BiohazarD said:

Gadheras said:

Stormfall said:

Gadheras said:

Well, remove all inactives, clear out bots. Leaves a map of active players to interact with each other. Condense the map to bring all closer together. Let the carnage start. fun times...

If I am not mistaken after 21 months of playing this game you have 131k off and 18k def points. Your call for more pvp seems silly. You know no one is stopping you from pvping right now?

Frequency of pvp and units you willing to lose/risk. My last rather big one, cost me several months worth of unit build time, or if I rathed wanted to go to revive them in the market well over 100k sapphires. Which I don't want to sink into this game tbh. Doesn't change the fact I think the game need to be condensed and move active players closer together rather than wide range of desolate space.  People crying about need the inactive castles to raid for resources, make the game feel little more than farmville.

Well travel time to any beacon/fortress/hamlet on the map is limited to one hour, so the size of the map isn't really that important.  I'd rather have easy castles to raid for res so I can build troops to fight when I want to fight than be crammed into a tiny map with only active players and no way to build troops without spending money. 

Its never about resources its about time it take to build units tbh, you can have full queus going for weeks. It take the time it does. Its poor game mechanic from Plariums side to use "dead/inactive castles and bots" as resource farms and content. 

Stormfall said:

Gadheras said:

Well, remove all inactives, clear out bots. Leaves a map of active players to interact with each other. Condense the map to bring all closer together. Let the carnage start. fun times...

If I am not mistaken after 21 months of playing this game you have 131k off and 18k def points. Your call for more pvp seems silly. You know no one is stopping you from pvping right now?

Frequency of pvp and units you willing to lose/risk. My last rather big one, cost me several months worth of unit build time, or if I rathed wanted to go to revive them in the market well over 100k sapphires. Which I don't want to sink into this game tbh. Doesn't change the fact I think the game need to be condensed and move active players closer together rather than wide range of desolate space.  People crying about need the inactive castles to raid for resources, make the game feel little more than farmville.

just to comment further 

master accounts have been an ongoing issue that Plarium fails to address this shows that 

a) they do not care about the actual real players in the game enough to get rid of these accts 

just to comment further 

master accounts have been an ongoing issue that Plarium fails to address this shows that 

a) they do not care about the actual real players in the game enough to get rid of these accts 

b) they do not care about protecting their own interests in the game since many will quit if they keep losing troops to these accounts

It can't  be that hard? When you imported the kabam players over to Plarium, you didn't import all the inactives as well did you ?

Jezebel said:

Gadheras said:

Jezebel said:

BiohazarD said:

Gadheras said:

Alyona Kolomiitseva said:

Jezebel said:

they have the ability to delete them they deleted a whole slew of inactive castles to make room on the server before

You're right. And we delete Castles ONLY when we need some more room on server. In all other cases - even blocked Castles stay on the Map.

More room on the server? Now that is funny. How much data does a single castle occupy on your server in terms of bytes? lol. Delete inactives and bots, condense the world. Of course the world get much smaller, but at least it reflect the actual activity on the server and makes pvp more enjoyable, this game is not built for "sim castle" play anyways. 

Condensing the world would involve moving active players castles though.  I can think of a few people who wouldn't be very happy if plarium just moved their castle without asking...

agreed I would not want to be moved from where i have been since the start of my game 

Would be for the greater good of the game.

how does moving MY castle make the game better? just NO I don't want my castle moved unless I move it myself

Well, remove all inactives, clear out bots. Leaves a map of active players to interact with each other. Condense the map to bring all closer together. Let the carnage start. fun times...

Gadheras said:

Jezebel said:

BiohazarD said:

Gadheras said:

Alyona Kolomiitseva said:

Jezebel said:

they have the ability to delete them they deleted a whole slew of inactive castles to make room on the server before

You're right. And we delete Castles ONLY when we need some more room on server. In all other cases - even blocked Castles stay on the Map.

More room on the server? Now that is funny. How much data does a single castle occupy on your server in terms of bytes? lol. Delete inactives and bots, condense the world. Of course the world get much smaller, but at least it reflect the actual activity on the server and makes pvp more enjoyable, this game is not built for "sim castle" play anyways. 

Condensing the world would involve moving active players castles though.  I can think of a few people who wouldn't be very happy if plarium just moved their castle without asking...

agreed I would not want to be moved from where i have been since the start of my game 

Would be for the greater good of the game.

how does moving MY castle make the game better? just NO I don't want my castle moved unless I move it myself

BiohazarD said:

Gadheras said:

Alyona Kolomiitseva said:

Jezebel said:

they have the ability to delete them they deleted a whole slew of inactive castles to make room on the server before

You're right. And we delete Castles ONLY when we need some more room on server. In all other cases - even blocked Castles stay on the Map.

More room on the server? Now that is funny. How much data does a single castle occupy on your server in terms of bytes? lol. Delete inactives and bots, condense the world. Of course the world get much smaller, but at least it reflect the actual activity on the server and makes pvp more enjoyable, this game is not built for "sim castle" play anyways. 

Condensing the world would involve moving active players castles though.  I can think of a few people who wouldn't be very happy if plarium just moved their castle without asking...

agreed I would not want to be moved from where i have been since the start of my game 

Jezebel said:

they have the ability to delete them they deleted a whole slew of inactive castles to make room on the server before

You're right. And we delete Castles ONLY when we need some more room on server. In all other cases - even blocked Castles stay on the Map.

Gadheras said:

Alyona Kolomiitseva said:

Jezebel said:

they have the ability to delete them they deleted a whole slew of inactive castles to make room on the server before

You're right. And we delete Castles ONLY when we need some more room on server. In all other cases - even blocked Castles stay on the Map.

More room on the server? Now that is funny. How much data does a single castle occupy on your server in terms of bytes? lol. Delete inactives and bots, condense the world. Of course the world get much smaller, but at least it reflect the actual activity on the server and makes pvp more enjoyable, this game is not built for "sim castle" play anyways. 

Contrary to popular believe there is way too much activity in the Untamed Land, that on the Dark plain. I can get 10K points in 15 min on untamed land, But the dark plains, its crazy.

Getting PvP is easy there, but so are the risk of losing. I think its because of bots. there are so many bots in the untamed land, although Plarium deactivated them, and their resource prduction is like 1 gold/iron per 2 hrs, the regional chats is still very active(chamber 1). 

Jezebel said:

BiohazarD said:

Jezebel said:

DrFondles said:

-555; 866

-560; 865

-564; 865

-570; 866

-580; 865

-585; 865

-590; 865

-594; 865

-600; 866

And guess what. The pattern keeps going on for miles on 866 and 865. Lets see what you guy's can do ALYONA. I use to be a CM for Kabam. And I tried to make a difference. This is on server 3, funny how we got infected by this after we transferred over to your servers. Yay....

-Synergy

welcome to Plarium - don't get your hopes up on this one the "master" accounts have been on Server 1 for well over a year now and have been reported since they appeared - still nothing has been done

I think they've been banned a few times, but a new set just pops up a few days later. 

i still have some in my blacklist from last year they are still there - if you look at the screen shots i put in the other thread there are whole lines of them like the other bots

When plarium bans an account the actual castle doesn't disappear, it just can't be logged into anymore.  But yes, I've seen the lines.  I'm not sure why after banning 20 "master" castles that were reported by players all in a line, support can't just follow that line and ban the 21st castle with the same name and so on. 

Jezebel said:

BiohazarD said:

Jezebel said:

DrFondles said:

-555; 866

-560; 865

-564; 865

-570; 866

-580; 865

-585; 865

-590; 865

-594; 865

-600; 866

And guess what. The pattern keeps going on for miles on 866 and 865. Lets see what you guy's can do ALYONA. I use to be a CM for Kabam. And I tried to make a difference. This is on server 3, funny how we got infected by this after we transferred over to your servers. Yay....

-Synergy

welcome to Plarium - don't get your hopes up on this one the "master" accounts have been on Server 1 for well over a year now and have been reported since they appeared - still nothing has been done

I think they've been banned a few times, but a new set just pops up a few days later. 

i still have some in my blacklist from last year they are still there - if you look at the screen shots i put in the other thread there are whole lines of them like the other bots

When plarium bans an account the actual castle doesn't disappear, it just can't be logged into anymore.  But yes, I've seen the lines.  I'm not sure why after banning 20 "master" castles that were reported by players all in a line, support can't just follow that line and ban the 21st castle with the same name and so on. 

BiohazarD said:

Jezebel said:

DrFondles said:

-555; 866

-560; 865

-564; 865

-570; 866

-580; 865

-585; 865

-590; 865

-594; 865

-600; 866

And guess what. The pattern keeps going on for miles on 866 and 865. Lets see what you guy's can do ALYONA. I use to be a CM for Kabam. And I tried to make a difference. This is on server 3, funny how we got infected by this after we transferred over to your servers. Yay....

-Synergy

welcome to Plarium - don't get your hopes up on this one the "master" accounts have been on Server 1 for well over a year now and have been reported since they appeared - still nothing has been done

I think they've been banned a few times, but a new set just pops up a few days later. 

i still have some in my blacklist from last year they are still there - if you look at the screen shots i put in the other thread there are whole lines of them like the other bots

-555; 866

-560; 865

-564; 865

-570; 866

-580; 865

-585; 865

-590; 865

-594; 865

-600; 866

And guess what. The pattern keeps going on for miles on 866 and 865. Lets see what you guy's can do ALYONA. I use to be a CM for Kabam. And I tried to make a difference. This is on server 3, funny how we got infected by this after we transferred over to your servers. Yay....

-Synergy

-555; 866

-560; 865

-564; 865

-570; 866

-580; 865

-585; 865

-590; 865

-594; 865

-600; 866

And guess what. The pattern keeps going on for miles on 866 and 865. Lets see what you guy's can do Alyona. I use to be a CM for Kabam. And I tried to make a difference. This is on server 3, we had never had an issue like this on Kabams, not sure how you guys deal with it here.

-Synergy

Oracle said:

According to recent evidence I have recieved, The most dangerous bots, whith the highest number of units are at X217n and Y-209n. 

these Bots produce nothing but gold and Iron, they must have their units killed.

To make it easier, just write a code, that will make sure that units at reported bots never reach X amount, when its over X amount it must terminate all the units and reset them back to X.

since its easier to find Bot names, These might work cut down bots.

i am agaisnt bots, and resource sellers, But if you kill bots, Its game over at untamed Land. 

 Well, I know about several places that just make gold and iron, these got castle names that just random number and letters, or russian sounding ones. The times I managed to kill units at these places always been spies, lots of spies.