Hello,
I will probably be one of the few for whom this solution does not suit.
This solution ruins the balance of the game, far more than it could have ruined 150,000 sapphires. As?
Now I'll explain it to you.
Suppose a player has lost 100,000,000 (100 million) of attack in battlegrounds. He scored a lot of points. With those points, the top 10 leagues have reached the maximum reward. Would they have reached it anyway? Maybe yes.
The first clan will take 10,000 sapphires + 100 designs (1000 sapphires) = 11,000 sapphires.
You have returned 75% of normal units (and maybe) between 50 and 100% of stoneheart units. = 75,000,000 attack points.
The "lucky" players (who until a few hours ago were the "unlucky") therefore find themselves with 75 million in the catacombs, + 90/95 (even if we are pessimistic 85) million attack (from the battlegrounds, removed the tax). So, they end up with an attack of 160 million (at worst) to 190 million (at best, if you revive 100% of the stoneheart). So, players have nearly doubled the units they spent, which will likely not be just 100 million, but some players a lot more. Additionally, they will get 11,000 sapphires (11,000 * 150 players = 1,650,000 sapphires) and the maximum rewards. This, if this is the system, could be a HUGE disadvantage between those who played that day and the others. I don't remember if there was also a battleground or PvP tournament, in this case it would have been even worse. Finally, it occurs to me that there is also the weekly ranking of stoneheart and non-stoneheart battelgrounds. Those who played that day will have a huge advantage, to the detriment of other players who "didn't exploit that bug" (unknowingly).
Now my question is: has this update been thought of? Was the Balur bank "emptied", at least without units of that period (to limit the damage)?
In any case, this decision is the worst (in my opinion) you could have chosen. You have created a HUGE imbalance between those who played and scored in that period (making the already wealthy players richer) and widening the gap between coniers and non-coniers.
I hope I have misunderstood this update and thought enough, but I doubt.
I hope it will be read as soon as possible and I apologize for any errors / misunderstandings due to the translation.