Way to apologize?

they promise something free and to apologize they ask for money???

I made 30 points because i didn't know of the rule, otherwise i could have made 100.

Its a fair idea in essence to combat coalition members who never contribute to any missions at all. 

But as said, what about new players. Also, is it fair to players who make high contribution in some missions, but not in a certain other, those people may choose to miss persian mission to save troop for pvp, or they could be busy that day, or they may just decide not to participate one mission for some other reason. 

There is already an avalanche of quests/missions/tasks etc that have turned from fun into a chore. Previous response to the overkill was something like 'you don't have to participate in all of them'. Well, this now seems like an attempt to force participation rather than a choice. 

Im not here to fight with anyone im here for my lower lvls  , My coal might not be the biggest or best but fair is fair and they did try. I think the scoring should be adjusted or lowered for them . 

I stand up for my lower lvls and i do not want to see them drove out .

 I do think that if you do not try you should not gain from it but they did try . I and my coal enjoy helping the newer players and i always will as long as im here . 

thatbloke I have been there done that in a final motive game bro ... No matter how hard you try you will be wrong in the players eye you are part of the company. That i learned the hard way 

I just think that 100 points is to much for them and a few of our newer players want to walk away over the timing of there change . We need to keep and bring new players to the game if it is to stay alive . 

Just think on that is all 

Is this 100 point minimum just for coalition position takeover tournaments or does it apply to coalition pvp as well?

Trajan said:

Is this 100 point minimum just for coalition position takeover tournaments or does it apply to coalition pvp as well?

youll know thta answer after tourament will be over

Don't they have introduce this because some hegemons would have complained some lazy people wouldn't participate and would just scavenge others' work ?

The forum is just the emerged 10% of the iceberg... So many people are complaining through support tickets you can't even imagine the crowd they represent.

Now two thoughts about this :

- As Killerjim proved, some hegemons are willing to help their members who are too weak to compete, by sharing those coalition rewards.

I think if some other hegemons would be more strict about participation, a choice should be given in the coalition dashboard, rather than this hard coded limitation. It should really be up to each coalition rules.

- Persian positions was especially not the right tournament to amend. Low levels (up to level 20 and more !) only grant 1 point per position !!! 

Beginners just stand no chance at all to compete there.

Only fair! Those of us who participate deplete our warriors and the burden shouldn't be on the same few. Sort of like the old fable about the chicken that was baking bread and all wanted to help her eat it, but no one wanted to help make it.