So, only pantheon attackers get 90% free revival. Pan defenders get no free revival and no reward.

Explain to us why we should defend these pantheons at all please?

Helen of Troy said:

Hi Neetox,

i am deeply sorry if you think my view is too personal and i aplogize, it was not intended that way.

The only permanent in this world is change and no one can stop change. My mother land also exercise democracy and freedom of expressions but thru change we learn a lot. there are always rejection and people insist when changes are being applied but thats not really matter now for us, what we do is we try to understand and cooperate... if you cant beat them then join them :-) but i am not joining plariums personnel.. just doing the reverse psychology :=)

Again i apologized for being personal :-)

Hi Helen of Troy,

thank you for understanding, it is nice that you speak openly and like me seek for improvements and changes for the better.

Best regards,

Neetox

Alyona Kolomiitseva said:

Q&A

Bigger Coalitions have more Defense than the smaller ones, right? Show your enemies that you're not afraid of them, show your teamwork and you will get some benefits from this Tournament.

Do you play the game Alyona?

I doubt it.

Or do you?

I'd like to park near your city and slap your city every morning.

So, only pantheon attackers get 90% free revival. Pan defenders get no free revival and no reward.

Explain to us why we should defend these pantheons at all please?

Alyona,you deleting my posts every day >:(

you send me msg and i cant answer to you^^

leave my posts alone,i am not rude 

paladin said:

Alyona Kolomiitseva said:

Q&A

Bigger Coalitions have more Defense than the smaller ones, right? Show your enemies that you're not afraid of them, show your teamwork and you will get some benefits from this Tournament.

Do you play the game Alyona?

I doubt it.

Or do you?

I'd like to park near your city and slap your city every morning.

i wish i know where is her city,but i would use different verb ^^

soon my post gonna be deleted,i'm violating some 3.15 rule and i dont even know what is it,i'm trying to be polite o.O

Tonaya

This tournament is turning into a Macbeth-like soliloquy:

it is a tale told by an idiot

full of sound and fury

signifying



nothing

what a stupid event! no point no prize and everyone ends up with 10% less troops!

Guys, maybe you have some ideas on how to improve this event? I'd like to hear them to pass them to our devs.

Alyona Kolomiitseva said:

Guys, maybe you have some ideas on how to improve this event? I'd like to hear them to pass them to our devs.

Alyona we are humans, we have feelings!

We know this event was so every participant (willing or not willing) ends up with 10% less troops.

You don't need ideas, this question of yours is only to make you look like you care.

Have a nice day our beloved community manager.

Guys, maybe you have some ideas on how to improve this event? I'd like to hear them to pass them to our devs.

Alyona Kolomiitseva said:

Guys, maybe you have some ideas on how to improve this event? I'd like to hear them to pass them to our devs.

Can you shed some light first on what Plarium's main intentions were with the event? For example:

1: Just a general action packed event where there are lots of BIG fights with little consequence of army loss.

2: Encourage fights at Pantheons because the view is that it is too passive there?

3: Provide opportunity of redistribution of Pantheon-power among coalitions where the view may be that there are too many coalitions without any Pantheons?

4: Put some coalitions in place for promoting that silly boycott?

I'd love to give some ideas, but I'm not sure what exactly the intentions were. Small differences there could mean one idea is much more attractive than another, assuming you want the intention/impact of the event to focus on the same thing as you originally planned.

jgvrolijk85rsa said:

Can you shed some light first on what Plarium's main intentions were with the event? For example:

1: Just a general action packed event where there are lots of BIG fights with little consequence of army loss.

2: Encourage fights at Pantheons because the view is that it is too passive there?

3: Provide opportunity of redistribution of Pantheon-power among coalitions where the view may be that there are too many coalitions without any Pantheons?

4: Put some coalitions in place for promoting that silly boycott?

I'd love to give some ideas, but I'm not sure what exactly the intentions were. Small differences there could mean one idea is much more attractive than another, assuming you want the intention/impact of the event to focus on the same thing as you originally planned.

Sure. Actually I think most of your points are correct.

1) Encourage players to work together and have big fights without fear of losing all their armies. Many players refrain from PvP to keep their armies safe. This Tournament is a good chance to have some fun while the losses are low.

2) Encourage players to fight over Pantheons. In most cases players avoid Pantheon attacks, because they can cause massive Unit losses. We give players a chance to fight for them without losing all their armies.

3) Give all Coalitions a chance to capture Pantheons if they don't have any. On some servers TOP Coalitions didn't change for a very long time. We give an opportunity to change the position of your Coalition, depose current leaders and change the global map drastically.

Alyona Kolomiitseva said:

Guys, maybe you have some ideas on how to improve this event? I'd like to hear them to pass them to our devs.

sure, as the last time we gave you ideas it was so effective .... 

but here it goes.... and this is not sarcasm its real... if plarium want to get ride of all inactive players troops stationary (as that was the only objective of the event), now lets do a capital massacre :-) so that balances all, only pantheons is not fair