If you try to evaluate the cost benefit well .....

Then the answer will always be: Stop, don't attack ... you're going to lose and plarium won't give you anything.

Do you understand ??? there is the problem the game dies because nobody attacks .. there is no war, because the cost is always 100 and the benefit is 0.

On capitals .. you have made me laugh, if you had more experience you would know that with the null prizes it gives .. strong capitals are unassailable, not even if a whole union attacked spending all the salary of a month they would achieve it ..

However, if the capital tournaments gave incredible prizes, you could participate, not necessarily with the aim of knocking down a cap in one day, about what gives medals ... please don't make me laugh.

As for the xp, there are simpler and more controlled ways to get to the xp level, such as the Persian positions, an experienced player knows how to take advantage of this, now, if you are happy to lose your troops, ok I think it is good for you, but that way The game doesn't work for everyone, so why do I want to hit a good XP level and be left with nothing?

Maintaining a capital at level 20 is a luxury that few can afford, not all coalitions are in a position to do such a great task as leveling up a capital and defending it, I play in one of the strongest coas on the server, of course, We have 20 capital, but look at how many coali has a capital of that level, you can count on the fingers of your hands, now, why do I want my coa to have tools and medals in exchange for losing the troops? , for something we already have? This does not make sense with someone who knows how to play the game, here the point of discussion is the bad state of the game and the poor and poorly planned events that exist, because they do not give reward, nor do they encourage consumption, so here all of them. lose, until one day there is no game for us, no money for plarium, are you happy with that?

As for the xp, there are simpler and more controlled ways to get to the xp level, such as the Persian positions, an experienced player knows how to take advantage of this, now, if you are happy to lose your troops, ok I think it is good for you, but that way The game doesn't work for everyone, so why do I want to hit a good XP level and be left with nothing?

Maintaining a capital at level 20 is a luxury that few can afford, not all coalitions are in a position to do such a great task as leveling up a capital and defending it, I play in one of the strongest coas on the server, of course, We have 20 capital, but look at how many coali has a capital of that level, you can count on the fingers of your hands, now, why do I want my coa to have tools and medals in exchange for losing the troops? , for something we already have? This does not make sense with someone who knows how to play the game, here the point of discussion is the bad state of the game and the poor and poorly planned events that exist, because they do not give reward, nor do they encourage consumption, so here all of them. lose, until one day there is no game for us, no money for plarium, are you happy with that?

The teams that don't have level 20 capital still could merge in order to achieve one, between more active players playing together. Or not, or just play the way they are playing now. 

The game allows players to make a lot of choices. 

Hello Yaviz

I'm sorry that you are feeling this way. I did performe attacks and my team too, and we were successful in bringing down a couple of level 20 capital with the help of the Union. 

Anyway, If you feel there could be more interest in capital tournaments with better rewards, please feel free to post your suggestion on our official thread.

Have a nice spartan day!

Hi Vanessamei

it might be helpful if you post screenshots of your attacks (removing identifiers of course) then people would be able to see what you mean

a picture is worth a thousand words :)

if you could also please explain your recovery method afterwards as well as the cost and benefit mechanics I am sure everyone would be very interested :)

afterall you are in one of the top scoring coalitions of sll time on FB server 1 so I am sure you have a wealth of experience the .com server players could benefit from :)

thanks for the info Vanessamei, I am sure forum members will appreciate it :)

I concurr that the large hammers followed by smaller hits seems to be the most efficiant method, sadly I dont have screens as my old PC died a month ago and havent been able to recover anything from the HDD. 

Recovery can be made by efficiant game play, utilising the tournaments so you get maximum rewards using the minimum of units needed and some well thought out PP runs.

I am extremely lucky tht I have an awesome hegemon who works all that out for us and guides us in what we need to do. 

Our big hammer hits recovered within 2 months and the enemy cap remains at level 5 :)

Oh well, Mortee... as you already know, I recently changed teams so, the hits are on the page of my former team.

I was in charge of general organization and my hit landed 5 seconds after the downgrade, so no many losses on my behalf at that time. I did some test hits before, but recovery was fast. 

The mechanics were 2 big hammers at the beginning, then triples of 300m from the whole Union and we had some big hammers prepared for finishing it that we didn't get to use because the capital fell sooner than we expected.    

Anyway, I am convinced that every team has to make their own path and strategies according to their goals and achievements. Since you saw what I saw, you may agree that yes, taking down a level 20 capital is costly, but it was a great experience. 

And if you disagree, that's ok too. It's all about game style and goals achievements at the end.

We are always open to suggestions, Archons. In case you want to share your ideas in order how to make the game more interesting, feel free to write them here.

If you try to evaluate the cost benefit well .....

Then the answer will always be: Stop, don't attack ... you're going to lose and plarium won't give you anything.

Do you understand ??? there is the problem the game dies because nobody attacks .. there is no war, because the cost is always 100 and the benefit is 0.

On capitals .. you have made me laugh, if you had more experience you would know that with the null prizes it gives .. strong capitals are unassailable, not even if a whole union attacked spending all the salary of a month they would achieve it ..

However, if the capital tournaments gave incredible prizes, you could participate, not necessarily with the aim of knocking down a cap in one day, about what gives medals ... please don't make me laugh.

Precisely, I was asking you how you thought capital tournaments could be improved. I think they have a lot of room to improve and I find it interesting to share ideas about it.