Can you please break my post bit by bit as to how it's irrelevant. I can debate with you those points in order to arrive at a better standing, maybe even meet a resolution to  your complaint together. 

Oracle said:

Can you please break my post bit by bit as to how it's irrelevant. I can debate with you those points in order to arrive at a better standing, maybe even meet a resolution to  your complaint together. 

I wont ...

“Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.”

― George Carlin

Marcel Stokvis said:

Oracle said:

Can you please break my post bit by bit as to how it's irrelevant. I can debate with you those points in order to arrive at a better standing, maybe even meet a resolution to  your complaint together. 

I wont ...

“Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.”

― George Carlin

My first thesis is based solely on the fact that you misquoted that saying. 

That is Sarah Cook's quote. A lot of things are attributed to Carling even when he didn't say them. It's all down to the logic people use that the internet is always right. I spent hours browsing Carling publication and didn't find that

Oracle said:

The feature was implemented   for many reasons. Yes I understand that real life   works different compared to what we have in the game. Apart from the reason given by the CM, other reasons​ for this feature are:

To​ safeguard decision making to players that a league Marshall have appointed. Imagine if everyone in your league had an ability to start war with any league.

For league security reasons 

To enhance league play styles. Remember not all league want to war, some are grind and social orientated. 

To safeguard against bullies which will abuse the feature to pummel small leagues. 

The major reason is giving players the ability to say no. So if wars are not league goals they can ignore requests. 

Only people given diplo permission by the marshal have the ability to declare war anyways. Making it so the target league couldn't refuse the war request wouldn't give everyone the ability to declare war.

Hello, Lords and Ladies! :) 

The final reply regarding this question is that we'll not allow setting an automatic State of War status between the two Leagues.

Oracle is right, there are different reasons that led to this decision. But the main reason is that we don't want to make Leagues to enter a war as it could be against their policies. 

Also, War is not only about Battles, it's also about Diplomacy. So, you can solve such questions through negotiations.

Alina Phoenix said:

Hello, Lords and Ladies! :) 

The final reply regarding this question is that we'll not allow setting an automatic State of War status between the two Leagues.

Oracle is right, there are different reasons that led to this decision. But the main reason is that we don't want to make Leagues to enter a war as it could be against their policies. 

Also, War is not only about Battles, it's also about Diplomacy. So, you can solve such questions through negotiations.

So how can Diplomacy give you this http://prntscr.com/fwrgmf ? If all leagues refuse your war request because they can ? 

Alina Phoenix said:

Hello, Lords and Ladies! :) 

The final reply regarding this question is that we'll not allow setting an automatic State of War status between the two Leagues.

Oracle is right, there are different reasons that led to this decision. But the main reason is that we don't want to make Leagues to enter a war as it could be against their policies. 

Also, War is not only about Battles, it's also about Diplomacy. So, you can solve such questions through negotiations.

So how can Diplomacy give you this http://prntscr.com/fwrgmf ? If all leagues refuse your war request because they can ? 

roadstar Pitbull said:

Alina Phoenix said:

Marcel Stokvis said:

Juglar del Viento said:

Lord Marcel

i have edited ur coment and leave a yellow lines about ur behaviour

please refrain it and try to be respecfull with other people

Regards

please do the same everytime your fellow "moderator" abuses his powers ....
I realise this puts a strain on your alloted times online but it cannot be helped

Surely even the moderators must now realise what kind of flawed person he is if he is even being investigated by Lord Oberon himself
Besides this would not have happend if you had taken the time to delete his comment from this thread in the 1st place like i ASKED

Hello, Lord Marcel.

I don't see here an example when moderator abuses his power. 

Also, I would like to remind you that according to Forum rules it's not allowed to discuss moderstors and their decisions/actions on Forum.

You can discuss it with Lord Oberon in private.

Then perhaps you can ask Lord Oberon ( in private), just how many complaints have been logged against a certain 'moderator'.

Hello, my Lord :) 

I can assure you that any report sent to Lord Oberon is thoroughly checked and investigated :) 

roadstar Pitbull said:

Then perhaps you can ask Lord Oberon ( in private), just how many complaints have been logged against a certain 'moderator'.

From my experience with other games forums

Could be plenty of complaints. I don't think Lord Oberon can disclose that information of how many times a moderator has been under investigation. Most complaints are investigated, and if there is evidence of ''abuse of power'' then action will be taken against that moderator. 

Lord Oberon will not be able to discuss the outcome of that investigation with third parties, but the complainer will be notified of the result of the investigation and the action taken. 

Hello, Lords.

Lord Roadstar Pitbull, your post was removed as trolling of moderators is not allowed according to our Forum Rules.

Lord Marcel, please discuss all the questions you have regarding moderator's posts and answers with Lord Oberon in private. 

Also, I would like to warn you that any trolling of moderators will lead to ban.

Oracle said:

Gadheras said:

Actually, if Hitler had listen to his more than competent Generals rather than do it his own way, things might have been different. Also, at the outbreak of the war Germany had no real means to do a invasion of Britain. Hence trying to break them by the air before any such could take place, but hey, there is that litle thing called "their finest hour".... 

Britain was in a much worse state. They commissioned most of their naval fleet from the general populace. Thier navy was just old cargo ships equipped with guns. They had less materials than the soviet. If Hitler had attacked Britain, he would have likely won. The air strikes were also demolorizing. They would have won and the likely hood was than the USA would have stayed out of the conflict long enough for Japan to get its things together. 

But instead he chose to fight two fronts investing more resources to towards the soviet invasion. These gave the USA time to counter in France, and invade the mainland. 

Hitler had a plan to invade England, it had the name "operation sea lion" once the Luftwaffe had air superiority. Something they didn't manage + RAF bomber command took out barges intened for the invasion during night raids. The invasion plans got scratched. By this stage Britain had turned into a god damn fortress as well. 

As for gave time for the US to counter in France and invade the mainland. Yeah sorry, England wasnt there, Canada wasnt there. Free French Forces wasnt there....  oh and in addition , Polish forces and contingents from Belgium, Czechoslovakia, Greece and the Netherlands wasnt there.

and some more facts "The invasion fleet was drawn from eight different navies, comprising 6,939 vessels: 1,213 warships, 4,126 transport vessels (landing ships and landing craft), and 736 ancillary craft and 864 merchant vessels"

You know, the term Alies and Axies is due to a reason....  :p

Gadheras said:

Hitler had a plan to invade England, it had the name "operation sea lion" once the Luftwaffe had air superiority. Something they didn't manage + RAF bomber command took out barges intened for the invasion during night raids. The invasion plans got scratched. By this stage Britain had turned into a god damn fortress as well. 

As for gave time for the US to counter in France and invade the mainland. Yeah sorry, England wasnt there, Canada wasnt there. Free French Forces wasnt there....  oh and in addition , Polish forces and contingents from Belgium, Czechoslovakia, Greece and the Netherlands wasnt there.

and some more facts "The invasion fleet was drawn from eight different navies, comprising 6,939 vessels: 1,213 warships, 4,126 transport vessels (landing ships and landing craft), and 736 ancillary craft and 864 merchant vessels"

You know, the term Alies and Axies is due to a reason....  :p

Remember Nazi Germany used over 4 million troops to invade the soviet. On the other side of Nazi Germany the British were withdrawing after France was conquered. These made the British very vulnerable, they had heavy machinery which made them move very slowly. They land and air strikes which were a primary reason for Britain withdrawal from France could have done a heavy blow on the slow moving Britain army. The air strikes dealt a heavy blow on Britain military and air force bases, by 1940 Britain air force were almost crippled. Those 4 million troops could have just came around and finished the job that the land and air strikes failed to do. 

BiohazarD said:

Um.... Where are you getting your information from?  Britain had the largest navy in the world when WW2 started.  Some of their ships were outdated, but they were by no means a pushover.    

He didnt do well in history in school, that for sure :p

Ok lets get back to trolling and complaining. 

Oracle said:

Ok lets get back to trolling and complaining. 

Lets get these topic on trek again. 

Enough complaining and trolling, arguing about ww2 history is more fun :)  (jk)

Hello, everyone.

I would like to remind that it's Game discussion thread, and discussion of WW2 history is out of topic here.

But you can create another topic in Tavern, and discuss it there :)

As for this https://prnt.sc/fywpn5 spam messages. Looks like Master renamed all his accounts again, but Oracle has nothing to do with it.

Please report this account to our Support Team: https://plariumsupport.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/requests/new

So that they could take appropriate measures.

Alina Phoenix said:

Marcel Stokvis said:

Juglar del Viento said:

Lord Marcel

i have edited ur coment and leave a yellow lines about ur behaviour

please refrain it and try to be respecfull with other people

Regards

please do the same everytime your fellow "moderator" abuses his powers ....
I realise this puts a strain on your alloted times online but it cannot be helped

Surely even the moderators must now realise what kind of flawed person he is if he is even being investigated by Lord Oberon himself
Besides this would not have happend if you had taken the time to delete his comment from this thread in the 1st place like i ASKED

Hello, Lord Marcel.

I don't see here an example when moderator abuses his power. 

Also, I would like to remind you that according to Forum rules it's not allowed to discuss moderstors and their decisions/actions on Forum.

You can discuss it with Lord Oberon in private.

Then perhaps you can ask Lord Oberon ( in private), just how many complaints have been logged against a certain 'moderator'.

donlepre said:

Just do like Germany did and attack them and force them into war lol

Most wars are lost by rushing into battle without proper intelligence. History has taught us that. Also is best to use the term ''Nazi Germany'' rather than ''Germany'' when referring to events between 1939-1945. (your choice )

Nazi Germany didn't have enough military power to win or prolong the war long enough to force surrender. Their intelligence was null. For example, They attacked  the Soviet istead of Britain. 

If they did their intel right they would have known that British Army was lacking in heavy weaponry and motor transport. They also lacked the operational concept and experience to resist a German invasion. 

donlepre said:

Just do like Germany did and attack them and force them into war lol

Most wars are lost by rushing into battle without proper intelligence. History has taught us that. Also is best to use the term ''Nazi Germany'' rather than ''Germany'' when referring to events between 1939-1945. (your choice )

Nazi Germany didn't have enough military power to win or prolong the war long enough to force surrender. Their intelligence was null. For example, They attacked  the Soviet istead of Britain. 

If they did their intel right they would have known that British Army was lacking in heavy weaponry and motor transport. They also lacked the operational concept and experience to resist a German invasion.