Всі Категорії

Delete unused cities

Пошук
1 лют. 2020, 20:4201.02.20
307163

Delete unused cities

I believe that the game would improve considerably if the cities that haven't been active for (lets say) 12 months would clean up the landscape thus making the game more "user friendly".  It doesn't make sense just letting the cities stay on the map when they are never going to be worth anything to anybody.  just a thought.
Перегляди
1k
Коментарі
11
Коментарі
4 лют. 2020, 17:2604.02.20
307163
I believe removing towns that are level 5 and below and have been  inactive for 6 or 12 months is a good idea. This would remove some of the clutter on the board because these level 5's can't be attacked for resources and usually don't have very many or no troops to kill. 😏
4 лют. 2020, 17:3104.02.20
307163
I believe removing inactive level 5's and below that have been inactive for 6/12 months is a good idea. You can't attack them for resources and they don't have but a few troops or no troops. This would take alot of clutter off the board so it would be easier to see things.😊
6 лют. 2020, 07:1206.02.20
307163
Removing towns which are below lvl 6 and 6/12 months inactive sounds sensefull. On older Kingdoms could it be lower than 10 since no one there would farm a town lower than 20. The other towns are part of the game and of the business: Some farm the old towns and some other farm the townfarmers. And they all spend time and boosters.^^
19 лют. 2020, 23:0519.02.20
19.02.20
1

I have been playing this game for 3 years and I have seen clans stop playing and have seen some with 98 weeks inactive. If you want to make this game fun remove the inactive users so that people can grow more within the kingdom without having to move to another kingdom to grow.

This will also shake up the power structure of some of the kingdoms. 
28 берез. 2020, 00:2828.03.20
307163

Alistar Black said:


I have been playing this game for 3 years and I have seen clans stop playing and have seen some with 98 weeks inactive. If you want to make this game fun remove the inactive users so that people can grow more within the kingdom without having to move to another kingdom to grow.

This will also shake up the power structure of some of the kingdoms. 

That's a very good idea. I got the same opinion to this topic. When Plarium don't want to delete the players, then Plarium should automatically deactivate this players accounts after about a year of inactivity I would say.


Another idea of me is that there should be something like a "holiday-mode", to deactivate the game account when you ain't able to play it (of circumstances).

28 трав. 2020, 11:0628.05.20
307163

How about, for starters, sending towns below level 6 that have been inactive for more than ONE WEEK, clan or not, to their own little squatters kingdom without events where people who create alts for underhanded gameplay can sit quietly in peace with those who are truly inactive. That would solve the "sleeper account" issue as well as the clutter. If/When they return to the game, they can use the novice relocation to join the kingdom of their choosing and won't be able to affect active or 'soon to be active' events.

Opinions?
31 трав. 2020, 07:3731.05.20
307163

xyz said:


It would be nice if someone gave a really good reason for the need to eliminate the inactive players towns.

I suspect that one sleeper kingdom/server, would be enough, and even if it was, it would be a waste of it.

Most owners, if indeed any would  need the novice jump, and it would have long expired,they only last 2 weeks now.

If they remain in the active kingdom they wouldn't need the novice relo anyway. I've run into several people that make a point of setting up an account in EVERY SINGLE ACTIVE STINKING KINGDOM.. yes, I mean HUNDREDS OF ACCOUNTS each... that they use for the purpose of sabotaging KvK & CvC events. By no means have I met even 1% of everyone in the game so for me to have met more than one of these sorry sacks means that the problem must be more common than most people, and plarium, recognize.

So, it wouldn't be a waste to send these potential cheaters to an idle kingdom and allow them a new novice item to relocate upon return because it would still stop them from affecting those events. No one is going to check that many accounts often enough to keep them active, the problem is in fact solvable with Plarium's forceful attention to inactive towns. ;)

18 черв. 2020, 14:4018.06.20
22.02.17
4
Abandoned towns are a bit of a nuisance and certainly a waste of server space, the game lags bad enough as is. It would certainly be reasonable to delete towns that have been played less then an hour, spent no money and are level 5 or lower. Towns below L10 are also useless and should be treated likewise. In the instance of abandoned towns of nominal value who spent some time and money, send them to Viking hell, meaning, delete their presence on the kingdom map and store their info on the chance that at some future date they return. In that event they could respawn at an available spot as close to were they were, then if a month with goes by with no activity, they go back to hell. This also permits players to go on holiday, just put up a one month shield and return when you are able. These towns are more of a nuisance when located within a clan SH. The same can be said for abandoned SHs. There are way to many L1 SHs that have been idle for a year and more and they detract from the desirability of their kingdoms and the ability for new clans to form. The ability to relocate to a different kingdom has had a good impact on the game but older kingdoms are burdened by the level of abandonment which chokes their development. Another problem are clans who's Chief has gone awol. There really should be a means for the Elders to reclaim their SH but that is a trickier subject. To summarize: Deleting abandoned towns frees up server space as these towns no longer need to be stored and generated which could help with the lag issue which is a very real problem.
13 серп. 2020, 14:2413.08.20
307163

1LONEWOLF3...

ABSOLUTELY!!!

PLARIUM NEEDS TO STOP USING DERELICT TOWNS TO MAKE THE GAME SEEM BIGGER THAN IT IS!!

IT IS BIG, BUT NOT 10+MILLION ACTIVE.

THEY SHOULD SEND AN EMAIL NOTICE AFTER 3 MONTHS OF UN-SHIELDED INACTIVITY,

NO MATTER WHAT LEVEL THE TOWN IS,  AS IT HAS CLEARLY BEEN ABANDONED.

AND INFORM THEM THAT IN 15 DAYS THEIR TOWN WILL BE PERMANENTLY

 DELETED IF THEY DO NOTHINABOUT IT.

PLARIUM HAS ALL PLAYERS EMAILS SO THERE IS NO REAL REASON 

FOR THIS NOT TO BE IN PLACE ALREADY.    


THEY ARE LITERALLY AN EYESORE, LITTER, AND A HUGE LAG FOR THE SYSTEM.

PLARIUM CAN SAY THEY HAVE 10M+DOWNLOADS, (WHICH IS TRUE) AND 1M+ ACTIVE DAILY USERS, WHICH IS TRUE.

BUT RIGHT THERE ON THE DOWNLOAD PAGE IS THE OBVIOUS PROOF OF WHAT WE ARE SAYING... 

9 MILLION DERELICT TOWNS!! 

JUST LOOK AT THE GREEN DOT ON THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE...

7+ MILLION REGISTERED USERS... HOW MANY OF THOSE ARE NOW OWNERS

 OF DERELICT TOWNS?


THEY NEED TO UNDERSTAND HOW UGLY AND A MESS IT LOOKS LIKE, AND IT IS A HORRIBLE

 EYE STRAIN TRYING TO LOOK FOR THINGS ON THE MAP.  

17 берез. 2021, 14:0117.03.21
23.02.19
1

I assume those dead cities will also blow up the server resources needed, absolutely without any benefit for Plarium. But this aspect is their problem. It really doesn´t make any sense to me to see players with a lvl 1 city, who haven´t been online since about 180 weeks.

Btw, as far as I remember, it was announced that dead cities blocking corrdinates for Pioneer achievement wpuld be handled appropriately by Plarium. As I see, they are still blocking those locations, making it impossible for new players to get this achievement. Many cities on those locations were just founded to block these coordinates. That´s all tey do. Not very fair for newcomers who could be on their way to even paying players, if they didn´t lose any fun playing the game by being handicapped in this way.

24 берез. 2021, 00:4724.03.21
307163

As player who joined this year, it looks like a dead game when you see all these deserted towns. Who wants to spend time or money on a dead game? Dead towns lead to more dead towns, decay brings more decay. 

I would suggest that after 6 weeks after last login (or shield end), town simply dissapear from the map. If the user re-apear, he could be promted to place his town at a vacant spot. 

What is the good reason to keep ghost towns?