Всі Категорії

Is this normal?

Is this normal?

Пошук
How to join our moderation team?
2 січ. 2018, 20:4302.01.18
2

Is this normal?

From months I can't see type and number of troops when I am under attack.

This is the problem.

Regards

Перегляди
5k
Коментарі
5
Коментарі
2 січ. 2018, 23:3602.01.18
02.08.14
1109

@Antimob (2 January, 2018, 8:43 PM UTC):
You can't see troops en route to attacking you.

That's normal, as far as I am aware, so there shouldn't be any problem there.

3 січ. 2018, 05:1903.01.18
2
The problem is that before time I was not blind, people told me bug, hope you'll finish the problem&topic.
3 січ. 2018, 14:4003.01.18
3 січ. 2018, 14:42(відредаговано)
02.08.14
1109

@Antimob (3 January, 2018, 5:19 AM UTC):
If you mean when someone has sent a raid/invade to you, you'll get something like this (I can't find anyone to do that to me at the moment, but I tried my best).

https://prnt.sc/hvjp22

The person being attacked WILL be able to see: Who is attacking them, what the speed of the attack is, and how long it will take to reach them (Green boxes).

The person being attacked will NOT be able to see: Exactly what troops are attacking them (The red box; I got lazy and only sent a singular trooper, but you get my idea).

If you mean when someone's invaded you, same story. The difference is that:

When they send the reinforcements to you (In the form of reinforcing your sector; The green thing), THEN you will be able to see what troops they send to you, but that's usually defence.

You can also recon the troops stationned at your sector, which will tell you how many troops remain.

Is there another interpretation of this, or do you mean something completely different?

3 січ. 2018, 16:0103.01.18
2

'The person being attacked will NOT be able to see: Exactly what troops are attacking them (The red box; I got lazy and only sent a singular trooper, but you get my idea)'

yes, unknown type and numbers

3 січ. 2018, 20:0403.01.18
02.08.14
1109

@Antimob (3 January, 2018, 4:01 PM UTC):
Then if my understanding of the problem is correct, then it must've been a bug before, where you could see them (You're not supposed to be able to see them).