So I kinda agree with you about B7 and D3.

Not sure about D1 Port Requests, cause you can just ask your ordermates for rss

And what do you mean in B2.- Combine Marches by sending them to the same location.  ? Like 1 March with no limits in it or what?

I liked B3, B4... "Total Time for expedition" it would be convenient too. Not sure about Auction House

Mate, I agree with you about B3! Good idea.

Hi all. I'm sorry if this is not the right place but I want to suggest a couple of things to the developers:

1. In-game translator. Unmissable. It's frustrating do not communicate with other players because of the language. Almost all the similar games have it.

2. Offline warning messages. It's good to know that our troops have found a treasure but it's even better if we are awared that an enemy army is coming. Nobody is online 24/7

Jake said:

So I kinda agree with you about B7 and D3.

Not sure about D1 Port Requests, cause you can just ask your ordermates for rss

And what do you mean in B2.- Combine Marches by sending them to the same location.  ? Like 1 March with no limits in it or what?

I made new Edits explaining the features, but in summary, the port requests  avoids the player to be sent the same resources twice (and avoid tax penalties). It can also allow for requests of resources even if the donator is not online yet. 

Mate, I agree with you about B3! Good idea.

jordirabionet said:

Hi all. I'm sorry if this is not the right place but I want to suggest a couple of things to the developers:

1. In-game translator. Unmissable. It's frustrating do not communicate with other players because of the language. Almost all the similar games have it.

2. Offline warning messages. It's good to know that our troops have found a treasure but it's even better if we are awared that an enemy army is coming. Nobody is online 24/7

Many thanks and good game!!!

Hey there, actually the topic about an in-game-translator has been brought up in my kingdom so many times (every time). Apparently, it is a big issue in every server. I will add your suggestion into Category A (Kingdom Features). 

The offline warning messages is also a good suggestion. i will also add it to category A (Kingdom Features) 

I made new Edits explaining the features, but in summary, the port requests  avoids the player to be sent the same resources twice (and avoid tax penalties). It can also allow for requests of resources even if the donator is not online yet. 

For the combine marches, i meant to say combine troops if the marches meet in the same location (e.g. reinforcement of castle). 

Jake said:

But I don't agree about combing marches. On the last levels high upgraded players will be able to attack you without limit on march then, just because they combine their troops in the same location (your castle for example) so, for me, it's seem to be unbalanced

It will make OS useless. And it will make big donate guys more strong. I don't think that it will good for usual players.

Jake said:

Luy said:

I made new Edits explaining the features, but in summary, the port requests  avoids the player to be sent the same resources twice (and avoid tax penalties). It can also allow for requests of resources even if the donator is not online yet. 

For the combine marches, i meant to say combine troops if the marches meet in the same location (e.g. reinforcement of castle). 

Ok, now i think it's good idea about port. But I don't agree about combing marches. On the last levels high upgraded players will be able to attack you without limit on march then, just because they combine their troops in the same location (your castle for example) so, for me, it's seem to be unbalanced

unlimited will be if you put together the features of "combining marches" and "attacks take time." Currently attacks to castles are instantaneous, so it doesnt matter how many marches you send to attack, they wont combine. 

Even if  B2 and B7 are put together, there is the limit of troops per march. So it would be better just to send them all in one attack. But say for example that people do it anyways. The way the game works is it takes into account the first action, and later it does the second (for what i have noticed) this means that the waves attacking castles will be working independent from each other, instead of combining forces. So If the first arrives at 12:00:00 pm and the second wave arrives at 12:00:10s pm, then both waves will be at your castle at the same time, but the second wave will only kill the troops left over from the first wave.  Since the marches combine, all the troops will be leaving at 12:00:40s PM instead of the first wave leaving at 12:00:30s PM. So the troops will take longer, they will actually be less efficient than sending them all in 1 wave, and the defending castle will have an additional 40sec of retreating troops from B7-II. 

Kris Teilor said:

Jake said:

But I don't agree about combing marches. On the last levels high upgraded players will be able to attack you without limit on march then, just because they combine their troops in the same location (your castle for example) so, for me, it's seem to be unbalanced

It will make OS useless. And it will make big donate guys more strong. I don't think that it will good for usual players.

Hello. I found that automatic assignment of the hero to a march is really unconfortable. Perhaps it's good for newbee but when you have more marches to manage, too many times found you out to recall some. As I believe, normal principle of UX is that you choose what to send, not the machine. May I suggest it should be in the same window with same slider, so avoiding confusion.

What are Big donate guys? 

In case, Ive contacted the support as to the community button not having the forum lnked > added the next day.

Now, several suggestion as to trade, the chat windows, the alliance inter orders and some minus are all been considered as received.

So, If you have input (as in this thread, It will probably be quite more efficient to contact them directly, are we even once seen someone of the develloment around ?

Also, there is someone related to the community, who could that be ? The forum administrator ? How can he be contacted ?

Hello. A question who jumps to my mind, playing the event Kingdom War. Actually, duel happens between #5 an #50 (another similar case : #51 vs #4). I let you imagine the situation.

Few dozens of old accounts (a lot more than 100 millions points each) rampaging a kingdom populated by 1-3 million points, with a very few near 50M. More, firsts organized in few Orders, seconds only starting to know each other. Foxes aboard! Die, chickens, die! :-D Many armies are utterly crushed while attackers, fully loaded with legendary artefacts and others bonus, even take a scratch. On paper, kingdoms are equal (few very bigs match many littles). And I'm aware that little chicks should have prepare defense (I wonder how?) but perhaps the draw should be balanced or ponderated?

A duel like this seems not to be very funny to both sides.

I like this game very much, plarium keep up the great work. My issues are, that the line on marches, should be eliminated. Why give are position away for everybody to see? So they can sit and watch us march. Then landmark are tiles, then tile hit us. It's just not right nor fair. And i think the player, should get a notification, say within 3 minutes of the enemy being at your tile. Why make it easy for all the big spenders. Just because they spend big money, that's thier choice. But they should not get other advantages. I think my Ideals are strong and legit. They definitely have substance. And should be highly considered. Last thing, let the player copy/past into messages. 

Lorpot said:

Hello. A question who jumps to my mind, playing the event Kingdom War. Actually, duel happens between #5 an #50 (another similar case : #51 vs #4). I let you imagine the situation.

Few dozens of old accounts (a lot more than 100 millions points each) rampaging a kingdom populated by 1-3 million points, with a very few near 50M. More, firsts organized in few Orders, seconds only starting to know each other. Foxes aboard! Die, chickens, die! :-D Many armies are utterly crushed while attackers, fully loaded with legendary artefacts and others bonus, even take a scratch. On paper, kingdoms are equal (few very bigs match many littles). And I'm aware that little chicks should have prepare defense (I wonder how?) but perhaps the draw should be balanced or ponderated?

A duel like this seems not to be very funny to both sides.

well, as for my undestanding, the kingdoms are balanced with average power between total power of kingdom vs # of players... some players in new kingdoms will spent a lot of gold trying to reach the high levels... this causes over inflation of power (specially if all they do is buy troops). Therefore the higher the power these few players achieve, the worst for the kingdom in general because they will go up against much older kingdoms with higher combat experience. 

But then again... these are players that wont understand until somebody higher than them crushes them.... 

Thank for your info, Luy. Following KvK get other results. Farming was advantageous to the young ones. The elders were logically outnumbered.

Edit: I'm still thinking that inequality don't lie only with few packbuyers counterbalancing a pack of elders. You see that in Order vs Order. Half a dozen in an old ally with a round-a-clock routine can destroy every young alliance. Shielding is a very limited option because it pumps what should go in the Citadel building; playing cats and mouse... someone needs to sleep sometimes. Only way: don't mine, hide your units, don't breathe... don't play... ;-)

Edit: In my opinion, old players don't need any combat experience. They just have 30.000.000 points more than you, are full legendary-geared, with unlimited shields and relocates. Very sufficient. And to make you understand that fact, they put to zero your last 100 units. :-)

So suggestion: don't allow jump less than three squares an opponent ("Give the rabbit a chance" peace mouvement). Don't allow three jumps in less than an hour (so one can jump for attack and coming back to your base) ("Give the rabbit herd a chance" peace mouvement).

And, sorry for the digression, perhaps pick the kingdom and orders on a overall strength ponderated by mean per player, or variance in the ally... Imagination and statistics :-)