And I do not agree, Commander 
I remember some situations, when a coalition of small Combines won in battle with a really big Combine!

This is the strategy and we may not forget this 

As i do not see any1 long-time player here.

Let me remind  you all, that no so long ago there was ONLY 3 combines holding an MC.

And 1 was actually a training ground.

Now - a lot combines hold MC's

But, what i see here is a ppl, that just start to play and want to get an MC. With no or litlle efforts.

U need a long preparation or a LOT of money to get and hold MC.

No1 will give u MC just like that. No game will give u a global building, just because u start to play game.

Finish ALL your research and upgrades, start to make millions of O and D, then u start to look at MC's.

@GSSHanMukha (8 November, 2015, 2:37 PM UTC):
150.

Also, please do not type in all capitals.

I have writhen here before and i will yet agian ive played it since the days when there where only 3 combines owning all MCs and i sternly dissagrees that there should be a hinderance.

Reasoning why

1# As many said before yes u might find it unbalanced but dont u forget that those guys pay out of there pockets to get their units this aint a cheap thing to do 

2# limits to how many MCs would make those combines existing who have more MC lose them which aint really fair either i mean they do need to put stuff there

3# If this was implemented this game whould lose its pro players and those who stayed whould make it so MC owned by lets say Death Squad unconqerlble just do to the cheer amount of troops they can pour into defending the MC

4# This whould also serve as a way to increase the alts since it gives combines purpose to do so or spawn a ridicul amount of combines lets say it happens to Death squad again if there to own all those MC they whould hafto split upto about 7-9 Combines

5# Takes away the main reason MC exist to help decide whoose the strongest if u cap that u would need to remake the whole Ranking systems for combines since Dominance is based of the fact that a combine could i theory have all MCs

6# It whould punish those who fought day and night to get those MCs and then just get slapped in the face and lose some if they have to many or just how easy it would get to have a MC

7# And finally a noob combine is not to have all rights from the get go and bear in mind all combines have the possibility to acheive anything if they put down their will into it this should not be served on a silver plater to them since taking a MC is quite a achievement in its own right not a given right this is war people not some sunday equallity meeting or something of that sorts if u want it then u gotta fight to get it

(DISCLAIMER all my examples where not to commercelise or show any resentment towards combines or ideologys the examples they where just easier to use as is to enhance this text)

Yours Truly Daniel

PS Ive played for bout a year for those who wonder

chris

you are in combine that cant gain new players and keep them growing and active for those combines that can you make rash statements against being in the combines that struggle daily with those little combines taking pot shots at the mines to score points off our hard built/won defence perhaps you need to look closer at the structure of your combine before you slate the leaders

oh Yes and this is the same Brain Trust that came up with Aliens and predators you give them some good ideas  on how to make the game more better and fun   and they take no notice  but yet they come up with crap like Aliens and predators  in a war  LOL no wonder players are leaving this game  Too many     ' MC"'s and Aliens and predators

I see.

So, if every1 get a personal MC, that will keep ppl in game?

MC is ultimate goal to every combine. If u cannot organise yourself, to take and hold MC,  this isn't Plarium  problem.

I wonder, why ppl did not quit, when only 1 combine have all MC?

If, Plarium do that, what will prevent every1,  to make their own combines, and to get an MC ?

Main reason people is leaving this game is because its a game whose built in around the concept of 100 new players but out of those 1-3 will keep playing the game for years, this is how most browser games work trying to captivate the few rather then the masses, 

And this thread shows if anything that just handing over endgame stuff is not going to help its rather gonna conteract itself since it takes away much needed organisation ingame and teamwork both of which are a-z in keeping people active and wanting to play
FYI stand at my previous viewpoint surrounding the matter around the MC 

This is a war game, Commander. So everyone should struggle for everything here. If someone gives up on the lower level, you will just use his base as a farm, this is a part of Gameplay. So nothing is pointless here, and each one’s contribution counts. 

Combines who work hard a building MC's get to reap the rewards.

Should countries with powerful armed forces only be allowed 5 aircraft carriers max? Thats nonsense, hard work pays off!

Sounds like socialism Chris. This is a war game. The ones with the bigger guns win. I don't think there should be any limiting. The overhead of keeping them will take care of it on it's own. Quit medling.