1. How is it possible for Parium to delete a league without the consent of all the players who contributed to the activity of that league? 

If Clan activity drops below a certain percentage and stay that for a period ot time Clan will be dismissed. These are the rules of the game. Warnings are being send about this issue so players have enough time to make sure the activity raise again.

2. Why doesn't Plarium allow all players who want to leave the game to delete the entire activity, including the built base, so that the cessation of the activity is complete? Does Plarium deny players the right to withdraw completely from a game that does not match their wishes, does Plarium violate players' right to privacy and discernment? 

Leaving the game means UNinstalling plarium play from your computer. Data will remain for a period of 3 years based on law. After that all information will be deleted. Plarium does allow players to withdraw the game by removing Plarium Play. Plarium does NOT violate any privacy. Besides that in Plarium Play any name can be used as long as it does not violate rules. Player will in no way be identified. Rename your sector to Fred Flintstone and delete PP.

If you have any more questions or want additional information contact Plarium direct by submitting a ticket here: Plarium Support Center  

You are also free in leaving this community and I am sure you know how it's done.

Could you elaborate, please ? Posts on forums or you are referring to the entire player progress?

It's fantastic that someone had the time and energy to come up with some more elaborate answers. Thank you for this!

But my questions are still justified, the complexity is much greater than it seems, it has as stories many topics rejected by Plarium over time, but also many rules and missions changed by the same Plarium!

1. A league has developed over many years, and someone is deleting the activity of that league to force you not to take a break for a few months? Is that why Plarium introduced this rule? To create even more addiction? How correct is this? Reference was made to addiction and forcing players in this regard, in several posts deleted by Plarium. How fair is Plarium to players?
2. Here I mean the basis of the game, the facilities built and developed over time by the players. Where in another game did you see the ball and equipment remain on the field after the end of the game, or after giving up the game for various reasons? If I don't play, why do others still benefit from my work? Why don't I have the opportunity to close the game completely and those who want to play will play without me and without those who withdraw from the game?  Is chess played against the opponent who left the table with the pieces left on the table? What about tennis? Where else is this happening? How correct is this? I want my base to be inaccessible, to be of no interest to the remaining players in the game! I want that by deleting the base I will no longer have access to a way back, and others will not use my work, my name, my history! It is my violated right to leave the game, to give it up now and not in 3 years?

   I draw Plarium's attention, he changed many settings during the game, many rules, without my consent, without the players' consent. And I want to get out of the game completely, and no one will use me in the game! I want to erase my addiction to play, something that develops on creating addiction and arrogance!

   How correct is Plarium if it added rules that I did not agree to follow? How correct is it that Plarium has added missions and military units that will erase years of work, or that will make the game even more loaded. more clicks, more time wasted? Is it possible for Plarium to increase the day by 5 hours, to make it 29, but 100, 1000, or as much as he wants?

   Posts that came with a different kind of game development, that came with a different way of responding to a less addictive game, were rejected, then deleted!

   If Plarium has deleted the activity of a league built over the years, then Plarium must create the possibility for the player that his base can no longer be accessed from all points of view, both by the player who gives up, or is banned, and by the rest of the game! Game over to be games over, nothing elseor a lie!

Hi,

Both are related to the same game. The two questions had to do with the game itself. But I also referred to deleted posts in which ideas were rejected, some of them very elaborate compared to the answers received! Here I remind you of the posts with ideas for developing a game based on volunteering, on transparency, on ideas developed with intelligence and involvement, on the need for players to have a more appropriate framework for real challenges, where the gaps between work and conflict are more correctly drawn and transparent. The in-depth debate on these topics was rejected, even erased, Plarium developed addictive fatigue and unrelated to the reality on the ground, league maps were not visible for the entire map, small or large leagues did not know, and could not it is really known to justify alliances or conflicts, they were blindly generated! Even if Plarium implements those constructive ideas in this regard, they had to be followed by optimizing the game in simplifying access to those intelligently constructed variables, simplifying and good access to those things!

Even the two questions are interconnected, they intertwine and complement each other!

If your question was addressed to me, I'll give you a simple example: how is it possible in football if the opposing team leaves the game, the opponent to still score as many points as he wants in the empty goal, without a goalkeeper, without an obstacle? Where in the world has such a thing been seen?

My questions are justified, and more than just answers are needed, these questions show an objective problem and mandatory solutions! In this case, I consider that a player's right to leave the game and everything related to it, the player's desire to delete something that he thinks is forcing you to be addicted, is violated.

I want my base, my work not to be used as a pretext for future conflicts, for the benefit of some or others as long as I want to leave the game completely and not partially! I consider it abusive if my base is used in the game for another 3 years by the Plarium community since my decision to stop the game, completely.

I will bring other arguments to the two points in question:

1) - Plarium does not want to discuss this topic in depth because it has proved once again that the changes in the game force players to be much more dependent on the game. By creating that rule where a league can self-dissolve, Plarium has created an addiction, but many more addictions have been created over time, interconnected missions, daily missions interconnected with the weekly ones, personal missions connected with the league ones, and so on, making the players work even harder, spending even more time than before. I can understand this addiction, but I don't have to agree, there are rules imposed without the players' consent. DECEBAL paid dearly for disagreeing with Plarium's policy, he was one of the players who saw and discussed this topic, but Plarium refused him with bland and colorless answers, refusing to take part in an intelligent discussion. , in the development of the smart game. So this is a disappointing and disgusting result.

2) - This point is not debatable. A player must be able to withdraw from the game with his entire base created and worked on over the years. Plarium must block access to the withdrawing player's base so that that base cannot be used in the game without the player, create a button for each registered player to block access to his base by anyone in the game, Plarium to freeze the activity of the player who gives up the game, forever, and his base not to be part of the game! It is the player's right not to be part of the game even if Plarium cannot delete it for 3 years! If this does not happen, Plarium commits another abuse in addition to the first part in which Plarium changed the game over time without the consent of each player bringing more addiction to the game, and violates the player's right to withdraw completely from game, its base and name being used even after this decision of the player! This is also true in the case where the player has been blocked from accessing the game due to licentious language. Plarium no longer has the right to use the player's base once the player has blocked access. Here is a new abuse if the player cannot leave the game completely without agreeing with the entire Plarium policy! Just as Plarium considers his policy in the development of the game non-negotiable, so the player considers the complete exit from the game non-negotiable, and his requirement that his base can no longer be used by other players, former friends or enemies of the game, or by anyone! Leaving the game does not mean something that cannot be accepted by Plarium (Plarium no longer has the right to use an inactive base, either permanently by a player's unilateral will to leave the game, or Plarium has blocked access to the player for various reasons). A player has the right to refuse to be part of the Plarium family, or any other family! It is a violation of free will, the right of free will, it is a miserable abuse!

Plarium deleted the activity of an entire league just because the league did not follow a rule that creates addiction to the game, it deleted the activity of a league won in years of activity! True or not, it doesn't matter much to Plarium. Plarium pursues his interests!

But Plarium is obliged to grant the players the right to leave the game completely, by freezing any activities on the bases that are blocked or out of the game. Plarium is forced to create a button for a player's complete exit from the game. Uninstalling Plarim Play is not enough! And the basis of the player who refuses to be part of the Plarium game, whatever that game is, is no longer part of the game, in any form, any interaction of the game with a player out of the game is illegal, immoral and abusive! Prohibiting a player from leaving the game is illegal, immoral and abusive!

The use of abandoned or blocked bases by Plarium in the game is illegal and abusive!

The game uses these bases without the consent of the owners, and violates the right to privacy and free discernment!

Bases blocked by Plarium have been used as a pretext for conflicts, without the owner's consent, for many years!

I accuse Plarium of abuse of office and breach of privacy, the accounts have been used by the game without the right to use them for many years! My base is under siege in Stormfall (a game similar to this one) even though Plarium blocked my access to it, even if Plarium didn't create the condition for me to quit completely!

Plarium is a functional terrorist game! Uninstalling Plarim Play is not enough!

I'm waiting for the button I'm referring to, and I want the game to stop using my name, my base!

I'm waiting for an answer from Plarium, Urgent!