The ones that will be suitable for the players still need to be invented and developed. We appreciate the effort though.Hello!
We run so many Events so that every player could find Tournament/Event he is interested in most of all :)
You don't have to take part in all Events running in the game. Just concentrate on the most suitable option for you!
Maximus said:
Alina Phoenix said:
The ones that will be suitable for the players still need to be invented and developed. We appreciate the effort though.Hello!
We run so many Events so that every player could find Tournament/Event he is interested in most of all :)
You don't have to take part in all Events running in the game. Just concentrate on the most suitable option for you!
The Tournament that can be interested and suitable for absolutely all players is just not possible to invent :(
There is always something someone doesn't like :(You know that isn't true. If you truly believe so, you don't have clue what you do at work for a gaming company. The different styles of Tournaments are not the issue. It is the unbelievable effort, input and losses one has to invest in order to receive even worse returns.
The Tournament that can be interested and suitable for absolutely all players is just not possible to invent :(
There is always something someone doesn't like :(
Commander,,No doubt that MC would have been hit even if it had been the only event running,,But, here's a tip: A lot of CEO will instruct thier members to pull all but several hundred ligh/heavy foot soldiers when an MC event starts,,No major defense is lost but you will still have to take the MC back if the hit is successful...When event is over then all Defense is returned to MC..because there are so many that just wants to compleete the even,,get thier reward and move onto the next eventHere a very good example did not want to participate in a tournament had a individual hit a mine wipe out all of are troops I ended up take third place in the tournament and lost a lot more then I got