Всі Категорії

MAY Fusion

Пошук
9 квіт. 2024, 20:3309.04.24
23.12.19
162

MAY Fusion

Why is there nothing about the MAY fusion or the new lego login?


the May fusion will be different, the community will vote pn everything affinity, type and skills


Hellhades has everything posted

Перегляди
125
Коментарі
55
Коментарі
dthorne04Moderator
9 квіт. 2024, 20:5009.04.24
30.12.20
7505

Hello,

Moderators are only in the habit of posting dates, specific details of the kit and such when they become publicly known - rather than datamined information.

As for the details on the upcoming community based fusions, that will likely go up when there's polling that can be done by the player base.

Pertaining to the timing of things, moderators are volunteers and have the unfortunate task of needing to sleep, eat and work to pay bills. 

Warm regards,

dthorne04

ShortOnSkillzModerator
9 квіт. 2024, 22:4209.04.24
24.06.19
3559
dthorne04

I'm curious to see how degenerate/varied they let us get with the kit

posted by @ShortOnSkillz on the Discord server: 

i


It's funny cuz its true.

9 квіт. 2024, 22:5409.04.24
16.12.21
2051

I had something about each pop-up in the in-game news a few hours ago

10 квіт. 2024, 19:5010.04.24
10 квіт. 2024, 19:55(відредаговано)
23.12.19
162

i dont like you dont have all the information when voting on skills


The multiplers would very useful on determining the skill to take


you could take the first one that is attack ignore ss but his multiplers could be really bad


this is going to be a train wreck because we are choosing blind or incomplete information


MODS can ou please push the development to release multipers so we are not choosing blind

ShortOnSkillzModerator
10 квіт. 2024, 21:0010.04.24
24.06.19
3559
jrbulldog690

i dont like you dont have all the information when voting on skills


The multiplers would very useful on determining the skill to take


you could take the first one that is attack ignore ss but his multiplers could be really bad


this is going to be a train wreck because we are choosing blind or incomplete information


MODS can ou please push the development to release multipers so we are not choosing blind

Yeah this is definitely an issue.  I like the idea but not the implementation.  Would have been better to see full kits and then vote.

dthorne04Moderator
10 квіт. 2024, 23:1510.04.24
10 квіт. 2024, 23:15(відредаговано)
30.12.20
7505

I think the only options are to go with support choices because otherwise I'm afraid we're end up with Short's prediction. Then, there's also the issue of how much of a multiplier will they give an ignore stoneskin option. 

Option number 2 is the play, IMO. 

ShortOnSkillzModerator
10 квіт. 2024, 23:5510.04.24
24.06.19
3559
dthorne04

I think the only options are to go with support choices because otherwise I'm afraid we're end up with Short's prediction. Then, there's also the issue of how much of a multiplier will they give an ignore stoneskin option. 

Option number 2 is the play, IMO. 

That's the one with the new buff yeah?  At least it'll be something unique on 1 skill.  Supports are kinda universally good and unless he has big multis or ignores a bunch of damage as well ignoring stoneskin is whatever.

dthorne04Moderator
10 квіт. 2024, 23:5710.04.24
30.12.20
7505
ShortOnSkillz

That's the one with the new buff yeah?  At least it'll be something unique on 1 skill.  Supports are kinda universally good and unless he has big multis or ignores a bunch of damage as well ignoring stoneskin is whatever.

perhaps I'm wrong but considering how few champs we have that interact profitably with Stone Skin I just am bearish on getting a champ that won't just tickle a champ in Stone Skin. 

ShortOnSkillzModerator
11 квіт. 2024, 00:4611.04.24
24.06.19
3559
dthorne04

perhaps I'm wrong but considering how few champs we have that interact profitably with Stone Skin I just am bearish on getting a champ that won't just tickle a champ in Stone Skin. 

You're just praying he's a Georgie and not an Ailil.  Would you like to bet as to which one he'd be closer to?  😉 

11 квіт. 2024, 05:0711.04.24
11 квіт. 2024, 05:18(відредаговано)
13.06.23
170

Can't wait for our DPS Support Tank champion! 

I'm just wondering if there will be troll votes since it is the internet and it has been done before for things. Like we end up with a champion that buffs defense, heals based on max hp, does damage based on attack, and has a passive that increases accuracy but has 0 debuffs so doesn't need accurate. 


Know what would be interesting...a Support that damage is based on Enemy Max HP. Like we take the Intercept + Def + Shield thing for the A3 then if there is a choice for a Enemy Max HP AoE for A2 would be great. A support that can also pop off boss damage. Ah the dream. 

11 квіт. 2024, 12:5011.04.24
19.12.19
6963
Daehawk Gaming

Can't wait for our DPS Support Tank champion! 

I'm just wondering if there will be troll votes since it is the internet and it has been done before for things. Like we end up with a champion that buffs defense, heals based on max hp, does damage based on attack, and has a passive that increases accuracy but has 0 debuffs so doesn't need accurate. 


Know what would be interesting...a Support that damage is based on Enemy Max HP. Like we take the Intercept + Def + Shield thing for the A3 then if there is a choice for a Enemy Max HP AoE for A2 would be great. A support that can also pop off boss damage. Ah the dream. 

Am I the only one hoping you all build a garbage champ that is an easy skip?

ShortOnSkillzModerator
11 квіт. 2024, 13:1111.04.24
24.06.19
3559
Daehawk Gaming

Can't wait for our DPS Support Tank champion! 

I'm just wondering if there will be troll votes since it is the internet and it has been done before for things. Like we end up with a champion that buffs defense, heals based on max hp, does damage based on attack, and has a passive that increases accuracy but has 0 debuffs so doesn't need accurate. 


Know what would be interesting...a Support that damage is based on Enemy Max HP. Like we take the Intercept + Def + Shield thing for the A3 then if there is a choice for a Enemy Max HP AoE for A2 would be great. A support that can also pop off boss damage. Ah the dream. 

To quote Q, "We're gonna end up with the Boaty McBoatface of fusions".

ShortOnSkillzModerator
11 квіт. 2024, 13:1211.04.24
24.06.19
3559
Trips

Am I the only one hoping you all build a garbage champ that is an easy skip?

Id like another good champ.  The history of the internet has told me this is not likely. 

11 квіт. 2024, 14:1611.04.24
23.12.19
162

the reason I am not voting for the attack, ignore Stoneskin, that would make him more arena leaning.

the last fusion was for arena.

none of the 3 abilities look more then meh

I agree with who atated that it would be better to see the entire kit so we can make a more educated decision

Has anyone communicated this with the other team explaining how this will be a trainwreck without?

11 квіт. 2024, 14:1611.04.24
23.12.19
162
ShortOnSkillz

Id like another good champ.  The history of the internet has told me this is not likely. 

i agree

11 квіт. 2024, 14:2011.04.24
11 квіт. 2024, 14:20(відредаговано)
23.12.19
162

Without all the information or multiplers the champ could end up like Mezomel, where on paper she looks like a nuker but multipers are so low she hits like a wet noodle

then you will have the trolls

Trainwreck!!!!!!!!!!!

11 квіт. 2024, 20:2811.04.24
31.01.20
1755
Trips

Am I the only one hoping you all build a garbage champ that is an easy skip?

😀Wouldn't that be a nice gift!?!😀 

11 квіт. 2024, 20:3411.04.24
31.01.20
1755
dthorne04

I think the only options are to go with support choices because otherwise I'm afraid we're end up with Short's prediction. Then, there's also the issue of how much of a multiplier will they give an ignore stoneskin option. 

Option number 2 is the play, IMO. 

Well, the early voting is leaning heavily to the "Defense Focus" that introduces the "Intercept Stack" for blocking CC debuffs.  I am not sure I like the very idea of those.  It seems like the "Intercept Stack" is an immediate response to Armanz.