Plarium ... what on earth are you doing ... 

Was plarium preparing a new server for all these times instead of updating the old ones and make us fool by not doing major updates in the old servers....Now those admin are really doing bullshits work.

Guys, please be aware that our devs wouldn't introduce a new server if they didn't have a good reason for that :) If a new server comes out, it means that more players join the game and we want to give them more space. You are not forced to move to the new server, you can continue playing on your old one, as usual :)

Alyona Kolomiitseva said:

Guys, please be aware that our devs wouldn't introduce a new server if they didn't have a good reason for that :) If a new server comes out, it means that more players join the game and we want to give them more space. You are not forced to move to the new server, you can continue playing on your old one, as usual :)

exactly this answers are the reason i suffer from headaches every now and then ... 

Guys, please be aware that our devs wouldn't introduce a new server if they didn't have a good reason for that :) If a new server comes out, it means that more players join the game and we want to give them more space. You are not forced to move to the new server, you can continue playing on your old one, as usual :)

Out of curiosity , where the heck do you pull the updates/changes/ideas from ? (except the google analytics embedded into the game for tracking/"marketing" purposes). For sure not from your players feedback.

Alyona Kolomiitseva said:

Wy San Luis said:

Alyona Kolomiitseva said:

Guys, please be aware that our devs wouldn't introduce a new server if they didn't have a good reason for that :) If a new server comes out, it means that more players join the game and we want to give them more space. You are not forced to move to the new server, you can continue playing on your old one, as usual :)

Servers 1 and 2 are dying. Why not make something to add more players on those existing servers instead of introducing a new one?

Don't worry, new players will come to all 3 servers :)

You're just playing on test server that's why you don't understand.  Since you introduce server 2, the number of new players in server 1 declined greatly. Before, it's normal that 5 random players will join a coalition every month but you can see lots of small coalitions now are no longer growing. Our coalition for example, no new random players joined for 4 months. And now you introduced another server. You're destroying the hope of small coalitions to grow.

Out of curiosity , where the heck do you pull the updates/changes/ideas from ? (except the google analytics embedded into the game for tracking/"marketing" purposes). For sure not from your players feedback.

The kind of attitude "Don't worry" is just wrong. Hope i live the day when i can see feedback conducted changes to the game (PUBLIC DEBATE).

You're just playing on test server that's why you don't understand.  Since you introduce server 2, the number of new players in server 1 declined greatly. Before, it's normal that 5 random players will join a coalition every month but you can see lots of small coalitions now are no longer growing. Our coalition for example, no new random players joined for 4 months. And now you introduced another server. You're destroying the hope of small coalitions to grow.

Alyona Kolomiitseva said:

Zhiar said:

You're just playing on test server that's why you don't understand.  Since you introduce server 2, the number of new players in server 1 declined greatly. Before, it's normal that 5 random players will join a coalition every month but you can see lots of small coalitions now are no longer growing. Our coalition for example, no new random players joined for 4 months. And now you introduced another server. You're destroying the hope of small coalitions to grow.

If a Coalition can't grow, it can always merge with other Coals. Bigger teams are more successful in both: finding new members (most of the new players prefer joining a big Coa) and accomplishing Achievements/Tournaments/Missions/etc.

Even if they merge, they will slowly die. We all know that players quit for so many reasons and new players enter the game. But since you introduced server 2, new players were outnumbered by those who quit and now you introduced another one?

I would suggest that you should ask players feedback in a survey form "before" the updates. Not "after" because once it's implemented, it's almost impossible to take it back.

Yeah I think a third server is a very stupid, long-term move from Plarium. Sorry to be so blunt, but yeah ... 

Zhiar said:

Alyona Kolomiitseva said:

Zhiar said:

You're just playing on test server that's why you don't understand.  Since you introduce server 2, the number of new players in server 1 declined greatly. Before, it's normal that 5 random players will join a coalition every month but you can see lots of small coalitions now are no longer growing. Our coalition for example, no new random players joined for 4 months. And now you introduced another server. You're destroying the hope of small coalitions to grow.

If a Coalition can't grow, it can always merge with other Coals. Bigger teams are more successful in both: finding new members (most of the new players prefer joining a big Coa) and accomplishing Achievements/Tournaments/Missions/etc.

Even if they merge, they will slowly die. We all know that players quit for so many reasons and new players enter the game. But since you introduced server 2, new players were outnumbered by those who quit and now you introduced another one?

I would suggest that you should ask players feedback in a survey form "before" the updates. Not "after" because once it's implemented, it's almost impossible to take it back.

As I've said before, I can give details how so many players quit the game because of your unwise changes. We all know that developers have their own vision of the game but it doesn't mean it's the right one.

Hi there! I got you point, but there are a huge number of reasons why we need to add new servers. It's not so bad as you think, Archon. 

The more servers, the more diluted server 1 becomes.  Server 1 is slow, server 2 is dead and now server 3?

Alina Bright said:

Hi there! I got you point, but there are a huge number of reasons why we need to add new servers. 

RIX said:

The more servers, the more diluted server 1 becomes.  Server 1 is slow, server 2 is dead and now server 3?

We'll see, Archon.  

Well, as Alyona said vision, development plans, strategies of the game,,,,blah...blah....blah.....it is not necessary that what admins do is utmost truth and will be good for company...You guys too have known the so called good companies of the past, how and why they failed....if you guys dont examples of those companies...send me a PM , i will say....

Ashu said:

They are doing so that casual new players do not enter the first server and make it more slow. The serious players from server 3 can switch to server for real fun. Recruit players from there. And also there is the added benefit for some players to start afresh

Each server will continue growing. However, concentrating all players on one big server may result in overload that makes server too big. We were already forced to limit the max. travel time between the Cities in the past, because servers became so big, that you would need days, if not weeks, to attack someone on another end of the map.

So if only one server continues growing, it won't be so healthy anymore. 

Some of our players asked us to remove all inactive Cities, to make the Map smaller and to make competition more interesting. We tried that in our new game - dynamic Map automatically deletes all inactive Cities there, and only active players remain on the Map. 

However, it had pros and cons. As all your neighbors are active players, it's extremely hard to raid for Rss and not get destroyed right after that. So now our devs are considering some changes to this algorithm. We don't know how it will look like, but we are looking for a solution.