Even if they did this , it would become a bore too, it sounds exciting but it isnt really.

A challenge in a stadium with everyone watching sounds like the colosseum, but how could you get everyone to watch, besides there is nothing to watch.

All that happens is  a virtual army has a virtual battle with another one, the outcome is largely a foregone conclusion, its not like a real battle used to be , where luck and experience might play a part.

The first part isnt feasible either, if the armies were equal in size it would  just be a technical draw, though possibly the mecahanics of the game might give one side the win, a bit like in an election when the candidaites have the same number of votes.

If the skills were different then again the outcome  would be predetermined so if you were going to loose,why fight ?

How could you set your own parameters ?

Again it strikes me that the outcome would be known before hand so why fight if you cant win? 

Of course the games already like that, thats why big players dont attack each other directly, mainly because they cant because they are always shielded, its much easier to attack dead towns or players much weaker.

Vertofix said:

This game is getting to be a bore. The same events over and over, with the same opponents.

We need something exciting and different.

I propose Einvigi, the Viking Duel. 

Allow players to challenge each other in a stadium, with their clans as witnesses., one on one, same numbers and tier of troops, or allow them to set their own parameters.

Hello, VERTOFIX! 
Great suggestion! 

Thank you for your commitment to the game. We assure you that every letter with suggestions is thoroughly investigated by our specialists. We forward all players' ideas to our developers. 

Feel free to write us if you have any other ideas or suggestions.

Have a nice day!