Yes wouldn't be a bad idea ... but if it happened during kvk and not cvc doesn't matter ... and well could make the chief account an account all elders can access if/until the game changes the rules ... :)

I think they would need to come up with safety measures to do that.

You may have been lucky , but from personal experience, and insider knowledge,  of other cases,giving the chiefdom to someone else can be a nightmare.

Yes wouldn't be a bad idea ... but if it happened during kvk and not cvc doesn't matter ... and well could make the chief account an account all elders can access if/until the game changes the rules ... :)

It matters during KvK as well - or am I missing what you mean? Our rule is clear, if you loose shield during CvC - you get kicked. During KvK you get kicked and zeroed. (Not without exception, but as a general rule.)

CIM said:

Yes wouldn't be a bad idea ... but if it happened during kvk and not cvc doesn't matter ... and well could make the chief account an account all elders can access if/until the game changes the rules ... :)

It matters during KvK as well - or am I missing what you mean? Our rule is clear, if you loose shield during CvC - you get kicked. During KvK you get kicked and zeroed. (Not without exception, but as a general rule.)

Yes it matters if you want your clan to be the one to zero them ... if someone else from your kingdom can zero them right away then it isn't necessary to kick them.  (And yes same for cvc but it is much harder to convince someone from your own kingdom to attack your clanmate if there is no kill event happening other than cvc.)

I think they would need to come up with safety measures to do that.

You may have been lucky , but from personal experience, and insider knowledge,  of other cases,giving the chiefdom to someone else can be a nightmare.

Just like in life you need to know who to trust and who not to trust.  There are people in the game I trust and a lot of people I do not trust.