I like it when Plarium tries to put new tournaments to make the game more dynamic, but this last one of clash of coalitions, I am left half.
Because in all the rounds add the same things PP and PVP ..... it would not be interesting to put different things (divine, looting, sieges, guardians, villas, etc ...) in each round.
Four rounds, all the same, does not make the game more attractive, just the opposite MONOTONE.
Javi said:
I like it when Plarium tries to put new tournaments to make the game more dynamic, but this last one of clash of coalitions, I am left half.
Because in all the rounds add the same things PP and PVP ..... it would not be interesting to put different things (divine, looting, sieges, guardians, villas, etc ...) in each round.
Four rounds, all the same, does not make the game more attractive, just the opposite MONOTONE.
Hello!
You play PP and attack other players anyway. What is bad in receiving points for it and getting a reward?Alina Phoenix said:
Javi said:
I like it when Plarium tries to put new tournaments to make the game more dynamic, but this last one of clash of coalitions, I am left half.
Because in all the rounds add the same things PP and PVP ..... it would not be interesting to put different things (divine, looting, sieges, guardians, villas, etc ...) in each round.
Four rounds, all the same, does not make the game more attractive, just the opposite MONOTONE.
Hello!
You play PP and attack other players anyway. What is bad in receiving points for it and getting a reward?
It has nothing bad, but I think it could be more fun and competitive each round, putting different variants in each round (points for looting, sieges or even divine, etc ...) ....
Javi said:
Alina Phoenix said:
Javi said:
I like it when Plarium tries to put new tournaments to make the game more dynamic, but this last one of clash of coalitions, I am left half.
Because in all the rounds add the same things PP and PVP ..... it would not be interesting to put different things (divine, looting, sieges, guardians, villas, etc ...) in each round.
Four rounds, all the same, does not make the game more attractive, just the opposite MONOTONE.
Hello!
You play PP and attack other players anyway. What is bad in receiving points for it and getting a reward?It has nothing bad, but I think it could be more fun and competitive each round, putting different variants in each round (points for looting, sieges or even divine, etc ...) ....
I will forward your feedback :)
devs can consider adding more activities to it :)
Hi,
Really like the clash of coalitions tournaments.
Please do not remove the PP and PvP points from each round.
However, I do agree with this thread, please include other activities in there as well as was suggested.
Its a great suggestion.
Regards
Johan
Johan said:
Hi,
Really like the clash of coalitions tournaments.
Please do not remove the PP and PvP points from each round.
However, I do agree with this thread, please include other activities in there as well as was suggested.
Its a great suggestion.
Regards
Johan
Hello :)
Devs plan to include other activities as well. Stay tuned
why doing both again together? would not be logical to put them in different weekends to make the game more energetic?
and why only after 3 weeks repeat both?
Plarium,gived us nordman to fight on this coalition clash........what is your criterion to choose who gonna fight against who?
almost forgot to give you my feedback for this tournament,here it is: .I.
Tonaya
Tonaya said:
Plarium,gived us nordman to fight on this coalition clash........what is your criterion to choose who gonna fight against who?
almost forgot to give you my feedback for this tournament,here it is: .I.
Tonaya
Hello!
The Coalitions are divided into Tiers based on their results in the previous Tournament.
And in the Tiers the opponents are chosen randomly.hijadelafortuna T.I.A. said:
why doing both again together? would not be logical to put them in different weekends to make the game more energetic?
and why only after 3 weeks repeat both?
Alina, i am sorry, but its illogical
I don't know why Fortuna.
We have a separate team who analyzes players' activity during Tournaments and makes their schedule. I will forward your feedback regarding these Tournaments run together.Alina Phoenix said:
Tonaya said:
Plarium,gived us nordman to fight on this coalition clash........what is your criterion to choose who gonna fight against who?
almost forgot to give you my feedback for this tournament,here it is: .I.
Tonaya
Hello!
The Coalitions are divided into Tiers based on their results in the previous Tournament.
And in the Tiers the opponents are chosen randomly.
thank you for your answer after 17 days,plarium is expressive as always :P
Tonaya
your teams do not play so they have no idea about the game, it is a fact for those that we play daily actively .... maybe they should ahve less gym and yoga classes and mroe hours playing to udnerstand game so they can logically analise the info to make proper rutines in tournmaentshijadelafortuna T.I.A. said:
why doing both again together? would not be logical to put them in different weekends to make the game more energetic?
and why only after 3 weeks repeat both?
Alina, i am sorry, but its illogicalI don't know why Fortuna.
We have a separate team who analyzes players' activity during Tournaments and makes their schedule. I will forward your feedback regarding these Tournaments run together.
Just check first tournement datas:
1 st trnt Top coa´s made 70 -100 million points
2 nd trnt 6-15 mio
3 rd trnt guess ....
if it is no a Hint then i am speachless
Format is great idea but
Timing too long 96 h in a row could be a 2-4 week span
Always penalize the week end players ( NORMAL PEOPLES not 7/7 addicted )---> all trnt should be shuffle random
XP guardians always mid week
Pan / capi always same days
PVP always week ends
75% always every 2 weeks.
so big coiners can plan their 2 week cycle play
- use def the week no revival.
- play max PP week of 75%
- Hammer players on pvp last week end before revival
-revive your off, incres 20-30%
Good Game
the game become so predictable = BOORING.
Hello! Thank you for your thoughts.
As you may see, there are a lot of various tournaments in this game. All of them are optional and if you don't like some of them, you can simply skip participating.
As active players, you know that our tournaments are dedicated to the most popular game activities like raiding, attacking or defending, developing, etc.
These main activities have become the daily routine for our gamers. Still, wanting to make them even more exciting, our developers introduced the tournaments and rewards for them. These rewards aren't meant to cover all your losses and they will unlikely become the main reason why you decide to partake in a certain event. This is an additional way to get benefits from the activities you like the most.what would be exciting is plarium listening to players, plarium sorting out problems, plarium sorting bugs
Boris Shevchenko said:
Hello! Thank you for your thoughts.
As you may see, there are a lot of various tournaments in this game. All of them are optional and if you don't like some of them, you can simply skip participating.
As active players, you know that our tournaments are dedicated to the most popular game activities like raiding, attacking or defending, developing, etc.
These main activities have become the daily routine for our gamers. Still, wanting to make them even more exciting, our developers introduced the tournaments and rewards for them. These rewards aren't meant to cover all your losses and they will unlikely become the main reason why you decide to partake in a certain event. This is an additional way to get benefits from the activities you like the most.
it would be truth if we have participate button,so we can choose whether to participate or not,but if 5 coalitions attacking you,you cant choose to participate or not.right?
"it would be truth if we have participate button,so we can choose whether to participate or not"
I LIKE that suggestion Tonaya. Or just as good have the coals who wish to participate in this Clash stuff sign up a week in advance then they go head to head with each other. Battle Royal.
Don´t worry
@ this pace
with this deaf policy
soon will be nobody to play.
hijadelafortuna T.I.A. said:
what would be exciting is plarium listening to players,
That is called " delusion "
That is not a bad idea. Fighting for a pretty picture for a coalition capital is silly. But individual rewards in each round are not that bad, what kind of hegemon would deny that to his whole team?"it would be truth if we have participate button,so we can choose whether to participate or not"
I LIKE that suggestion Tonaya. Or just as good have the coals who wish to participate in this Clash stuff sign up a week in advance then they go head to head with each other. Battle Royal.
