Все Категории

Coalition attack to the City. What do you think?

Coalition attack to the City. What do you think?

Поиск
Moderators for Sparta: War of Empires
Moderators wanted!
DeletedCharacter
27 дек. 2018, 11:0727.12.18
241

Coalition attack to the City. What do you think?

Greeting, Archons!

On New Year's Eve, people always look forward to some positive changes in the year ahead. And we'll do our best to implement so of them! In the coming year, we’re planning to make Sparta: War of Empires even more exciting game, but we need your feedback. This time we want to ask you what you think about the opportunity to send Coalition Attacks to the City (if it is limited in the Offense power, of course).

Choose the option you prefer more and explain your choice in the comments!

No need to implement the limit;

Limit 150k Offense per 1 attack;

Limit 200k Offense per 1 attack;

Limit 250k Offense per 1 attack;

Limit 300k Offense per 1 attack;

Limit 500k Offense per 1 attack.

Просмотры
1k
Комментарии
13
Комментарии
27 дек. 2018, 13:2527.12.18
10.03.15
1574
as it is not the same a level 75 than a level 145 city, could it be the limit depending on the level of the city? like capitals?
30 дек. 2018, 01:3630.12.18
118

Some questions between players are already starting to arise regarding rumors of second cities and the implications.

Looks like players will face soon this choice of a coalition attack at a city but the real question is which city.... the main , the second or  both ? 

Many players are already facing multiple attacks from same coalition.

The limit should depend on their city level maybe ?

If a coalition attack is allowed at the city, many players discussed if then a live report would be available to see any incomes or hits to their coalition members which can be seen by the entire coalition and allow the balance to be made by allowing the coalition to defend against such attacks..

Also if the number of raids will remain limited or will increase at all?








30 дек. 2018, 10:3530.12.18
04.09.16
289

Why someone make a coal attack to a city with limit offense power when he can attack alone with full offense power ?

30 дек. 2018, 11:5530.12.18
11.03.15
676
guys dont drink and think about items that no one wants. 90% of cities are emtpty cause no one deffs them so think about realy new items that you never had before. not new units or levels from buildings or agreements. listen to your players what they say and try to do that. i will quit the game in 2 days and play something others its worst to play sparta cause its a time eating game where i cant kill troops in cities cause all guys that are attacking bubble or use auto unit hidder to save them and you have no realy chance to kill troops only in pans or cap where it costs to much.
30 дек. 2018, 12:5430.12.18
10.03.15
1574

ionannis, as usual devs dont care or listen to what players want... and have no idea about the game (and some fb players i believe they have no idea the numbers in troops that our server plarium.com deals as i know in fb is not the same)

we have already told them to concentrate in making the game playable, stop adding more and more non useful stuff but it seems that their idea is to try to get the last of the money before the game ends in a year .. it seems like there is no interest in making it work.


my suggestion of limit like a capital is thinking in cases like: what if my enemy has a wall of troops, he/she has the new helios city and several billions in defense, plus all traps etc etc a coa attack of 500kx3 is ridiculous, only someone that has no idea about the game would come with that limits. and of course no limit means screwing even more small level members. limiting the attack keeping in mind levels, would be more logical, but with realistic numbers not that ones of course. i have seen bigger fakes....

30 дек. 2018, 21:1430.12.18
29.12.14
104
as a consistent raider we need to do attack option like emporia that does not look for resources, but as a fight only, this way we may have more attacks on cities, instead of wasting a raid slot, or waiting for all your raids to be done before you can attack in this method (we are not playing all day, some of us have other things to do). We may see more attacks on cities and more combat with this option.
30 дек. 2018, 23:0830.12.18
17.02.17
39

Coalition attacks on cities ? ? ? ?  - scrap the idea ............ have the devs look at the game (or better still try playing it)

Every city of a level that would require a coalition attack to crack does not defend at all - they use acropolis or protection bubbles


Do you ever wonder why the high level cities do not bother with tower upgrades?

Wonder why we tell every new player to concentrate on maxing out their acropolis so new production is safe?


Attacking a city is pointless in sparta - unless you add some reason for us to attack cities first - why tie up your devs debugging a new feature as silly and pointless as coalition attacks on cities ?


Unless they are new players without the protection offered by a top level acropolis (everyone loves to smash these targets for easy pvp points - you know who you guys are) there is zero reason to attack a city.   (and these noob cities do not require a coalition attack to clear their little army)

31 дек. 2018, 07:4731.12.18
1208

I also think that coalition attacks on players cities is a bad idea 


The use of defence walls is at times the only weapon that smaller coalitions have against coiners and those with huge armies, you are proposing to strip that away 
4 янв. 2019, 23:4404.01.19
21.08.14
1025

if it aint broken,dont fix it.



Tonaya
7 янв. 2019, 00:5807.01.19
27.01.15
547

Reduce the Drachma package costs by 66% and watch your income skyrocket.   That's what you should be concentrating on.  You kept the value of the drachma the same over the years but increased the amount items needing drachma significantly.  Make's zero sense


I personally guarantee if you reduce your packages by 66%, your revenue will increase by least 25% or I will retire 



7 янв. 2019, 13:2307.01.19
15.10.15
1480

bad idea to introduce coalition attack on cities and two reasons for this opinion:

- Now there is no limit to attack and with coalition attack a limit would be put, we can say that this is giving opportunity to new and small players but we find that it really is to give more advantage to the big coalitions.

- No profit, divide the resources obtained or the PVP among 3 (usually in active cities this will be zero and in the cities farm only resources and in these you do not need help to catch them) zero result.

We took the attacks and defend coalition villas and then there were profits.


mala idea introducir ataque de coalicion sobre ciudades y dos motivos para esta opinion:

- ahora no hay limite para ataque y con ataque de coalicion se meteria un limite, podemos decir que esto es dar oportunidad a los jugadores nuevos y pequeños pero nos encontramos que realmente es dar mas ventaja a las coaliciones grandes.

- No hay ganancia, divide los recursos obtenidos o el PVP entre 3 ( generalmente en las ciudades activas esto sera cero y en las ciudades granja solo recursos y en estas no necesitas ayuda para cogerlos ) resultado cero.

Nos quitaron los ataques y defender en coalicion las villas y entonces si que habia ganancias.

8 янв. 2019, 14:2108.01.19
26.07.14
5

Is this your idea how to make Sparta more exciting game?  


The last update with new building levels that provide more troop power is for who? Or for what? Do you even think before you implement this stuff? Let me tell you what you have done: you only made a difference between big guys and small ones even bigger. How will non coiners get relics? How will non coiners get sketches for 5 more levels to get that 130% more power that you just provided to people who can afford this nonsense? No need to reply to this questions, they are rhetorical. People know the answer to them.


Your and our precious game is going south all the way my Leonidas, and there is nothing you or your team can do about it. You have already ruined Sparta so much that no one can fix this game any more. Sure you still have some players left that are not coiners, but that is last twitches my man. Like when you pull the fish out of the watter it still twitches, but just for a bit. as i see it, you have 500 players left in the game, more or less. Sry maybe 300 players left, the other 200 is their alts, lol.

This is the worst idea I've ever heard for this game, and please do implement it, like you always do with things that are making Sparta ''more exciting game''. Just ridiculous. 

And your next move will probably be new agreement levels, and we know who will have them.

I'm just wondering how many new players have joined the Sparta in 2018, that actually still play the game. You moved us onto a new engine (who knows how many players left because of that move), just so you can move us back again now.


Here is an idea for you and your team, step out of the dark, or at least wake up and open your eyes just for a bit. Although i doubt you can do that...



9 янв. 2019, 10:3709.01.19
5604

Hello, Archons!

First of all, thanks to everyone who shared their opinion on the topic.

I understand why the majority of you don't want to have this feature added. I forwarded to devs your feedback and general conclusion that players don't want to see Coalition attack to Cities added to the game.

Thanks!

The topic is closed now.
Тема закрыта. К ней нельзя оставить комментарий.