CB fight: Steelskull vs Narma the Returned
It's no secret that legendary champs can be worse than epic or even rare champs. I want to tell my experiences with Steelskull and Narma.
I use Steelskull for CB since 1 1 /2 year or even longer. Since Bad-el is part of the team 20 kk points at UNM CB are safe. Then I swapped Longbeard with Cardiel and the damage increased significantly even though I had to run without weaken debuff. Altan sets ATK decrease and Martyr DEF decrease. My dmg is now about 28 kk on average (best run at 33 kk, lowest result at 24 kk).
To improve my damage with that kind of team I thought I do need a better poisoner. Narma is a bit like Steelskull because she brings some heal to the team as well and does that spider poison debuff plus debuff extender which could mean some more damage. So I equipped her with lifesteal (at the moment > 3.5 k DEF, ~50 k HP, ACC 312) and skilled her with WM. I was thinking about booking her, but decided to do some runs before booking her, 'cause 16 (!) books for one champ without knowing if there will be any improvement could or better would led to a medium-heavy mental crises. As a well-known Raid YouTuber often stated: "It's mental.".
The results are pretty disappointing which is no surprise but I am very relieved that I did not put 16 books into Narma. The not booked Narma does approx. 4 kk dmg, Steelskull (fully booked, wich is not relevant, 'cause he does his damage with his a1 only) does 8 to 10 kk dmg at the same numbers of CB fight rounds (28 to 32).
I do not believe that if Narma would be booked that she would overrun Steelekull in damage. Vers, very disappointing champ though Narma is meant to be a CB fighter.
Any statements form the forums community?