They would lose more if they compensated for NERFs. Are you dumb?

All the new stuff noone wanted like what? Two mechs and a weapon set in 3 months? That seems about normal pace for new releases.

If you want to know why it's because people were waiting until a bit after the re-balance was over to know what to invest their resources in. The new META is just taking shape.

When have players been compensated for a NERF in any other game? Name me one.

As I see it, you bought a digital toy. When you did so you agreed its effectiveness could be changed. Said digital toy is one of several digital toys that all are marketed at the same base value. If they're to maintain the same base value, it's better for them to not have a clear best. It's better for the game too if there's not a clear best as it would quickly get boring if there was.

Plus in regards to it being a digital toy it's not like they've made it so you can play with them any less. I really think people need to quit whining about NERFs

No they'd actually not have the player who already paid for something that got take away take the lose, are you dumb!? Why should we have to take the L ?  Boot licker 

The name Slobbyknobby pretty much says It all doesnt it.....at least your upfront about your