All Categories

BG went terribly wrong

Search
Jul 14, 2016, 21:1107/14/16
02/24/16
4

BG went terribly wrong

Hello, can someone please explain to me what force i should have sent to that BG for zero-loss tactic to work.

Level 16  BG i've sent 34871.3, off force, to be exact.

http://imgur.com/a/b4PJ2

I thought that multiplying by 3 expected force of level 16 BG, 8790, would allow me to clear it safely. Sadly that wasnt the case.


Views
6k
Comments
31
Comments
Jul 14, 2016, 21:4107/14/16
231783
RightThingToDo said:

Hello, can someone please explain to me what force i should have sent to that BG for zero-loss tactic to work.

Level 16  BG i've sent 34871.3, off force, to be exact.

http://imgur.com/a/b4PJ2

I thought that multiplying by 3 expected force of level 16 BG, 8790, would allow me to clear it safely. Sadly that wasnt the case.


To start with you those were 109 demons. The second thing I noticed is you had several Legendaries without enough support troops. The lowest I have successfully attacked a level 16 is 82K offense. I believe you have an outdated calculator, since demons were not on the pictures of units you were attacking.
Jul 15, 2016, 03:1707/15/16
231783
RightThingToDo ha detto:

Ciao, qualcuno può spiegare a me che cosa forza avrei dovuto inviato a quella BG per il valore zero la perdita di tattica al lavoro.

Livello 16 BG ho mandato 34871,3, fuori la forza, per essere esatti.

http://imgur.com/a/b4PJ2

Ho pensato che moltiplicando per 3 la forza prevista di livello 16 BG, 8790, mi avrebbe permesso di cancellare in modo sicuro. Purtroppo che era il caso.


max value x11.5, you lose 10% where 0.5% count not die
Jul 15, 2016, 09:2807/15/16
02/24/16
4

brunsonthomas said:


RightThingToDo said:


Hello, can someone please explain to me what force i should have sent to that BG for zero-loss tactic to work.

Level 16  BG i've sent 34871.3, off force, to be exact.

http://imgur.com/a/b4PJ2

I thought that multiplying by 3 expected force of level 16 BG, 8790, would allow me to clear it safely. Sadly that wasnt the case.


To start with you those were 109 demons. The second thing I noticed is you had several Legendaries without enough support troops. The lowest I have successfully attacked a level 16 is 82K offense. I believe you have an outdated calculator, since demons were not on the pictures of units you were attacking.

I am using english version of Stromfall and those 109 creatures,  are called marennons just as in the calculator i am using http://www.stormfallbgscalculator.com/defensebgs.html

It may be outdated, though. It definetely wasnt updated after the last changes in BGs mechanics.


Zero-loss tactic i am refering to consists of sending one of each type of units you have (i sent 77). If their total force is greater than 3 times the force of BG you are attacing, in theory you, you wont lose a single unit (I lost all but 1 pikeman). That is way my Legendaries were without proper support.


Unfortunately all my knowledge comes from this forum, and I might have not understood how to properly use this method (pretty obvious is you saw the screenshot :)). That's why i am asking if someone could clarify how to use it correctly.


@ Jumy I might end up doing that, sending pikes or whatever as  sacrificial lambs, but that wont be the lossless method I was hoping to find.


Thank you guys for responding i know many people here are reluctant to share their knowledge.


Jul 18, 2016, 22:1107/18/16
02/24/16
4

Using the same 77 units i was able to clear other off level 16 bgs, with more evenly distributed enemies. I guess i need to spy first and find out what is the max number of maronnen/orks/... my troops can handle by calculating what actual force inf/cav/... has, as Jumy suggested.


@ Tony Hobson or whoever can answer. Why there is 16k def according to Tony. I know playtamin calculator shows that value but if you change for example pikes to 1000 it only displays 11k def.

http://stormfall.playtamin.com/?attackmode=5&attackmode2=1&attackmode3=1&a1=1&a2=1&a3=1&a4=1&a37=1&a38=1&a39=1&a40=1&a45=1&a46=1&a9025=1&a9024=1&a33=1&a5=1&a6=1&a7=1&a8=1&a47=1&a9026=1&a9027=1&a9018=1&a9019=1&a9=1&a10=1&a11=1&a12=1&a9003=1&a9020=1&a9021=1&a13=1&a14=1&a15=1&a16=1&a48=1&a9032=1&a9022=1&a9023=1&a94=1&a97=1&a95=1&a9005=1&a96=1&a92=1&d53=2&d55=11&d56=109

Which value is the correct one? I dont like using it as i doesnt allow to select darkened and imperial units, which i use, and spits out unreliable informations (or i just cannot comprehend them).

Once again thank you for your help.

Aug 29, 2016, 18:2408/29/16
231783

Lord JINIX90,

as a player as you are I would advice you to yellow as much Bg's as you can.

Although that tactics was better before even now you can score more troops than you've loosed. At least it works with me.

So, instead of defeating few Bg's per day wait for a while and defeat ten of them or more per week. It might help.
Aug 31, 2016, 06:5108/31/16
08/03/14
1364
Bgs arent profitable unless  you are throwing around a  2 million troops. Thats part of the problem with lower level players not seeing much pay out. 
Aug 31, 2016, 21:4508/31/16
231783

http://prntscr.com/ccoljs


just find a good strategy i do agree BG's are not easy but if you master them they are worth it

Sep 1, 2016, 02:0109/01/16
231783

@EXXXE

How much resources you spent to get that payout?
Sep 1, 2016, 07:5209/01/16
231783
exxxe said:

http://prntscr.com/ccoljs


just find a good strategy i do agree BG's are not easy but if you master them they are worth it

 That's a good one!
Sep 6, 2016, 09:1109/06/16
231783
Most welcome strategy change or pure luck, but today is a good bg day for me, and it ain´t the big payouts.
Sep 7, 2016, 07:4509/07/16
231783
Ryu said:

Most welcome strategy change or pure luck, but today is a good bg day for me, and it ain´t the big payouts.
It's good to have some lucky days from time to time :)
Sep 23, 2016, 07:5709/23/16
231783
BiohazarD said:


As far as I'm aware plarium does not disclose those rules, it's up to the players to figure them out.  There are multiple other threads explaining them, you just have to look around. 
You're right, we don't :)
Oct 1, 2016, 18:1110/01/16
Oct 3, 2016, 01:31(edited)
231783

gediminas.skunsmonas said:


BiohazarD said:


gediminas.skunsmonas said:


Hello, this question for plarium, you can tell my rules how you calculate payout
As far as I'm aware plarium does not disclose those rules, it's up to the players to figure them out.  There are multiple other threads explaining them, you just have to look around. 
Alright, then maybe you can tell my when I can expected full revard, cos now I going up lvl but revard always less then I need kill second lvl

I probably could, but I'd need to see a chart of what bgs you've hit in the past and all the troops you've lost/won from them. 

UC leagues can teach you how to do bgs properly (some other leagues probably can too, but idk), or you can look around on the forums for other guides. 

Payout from 90 lvl: dragon 566, grifin 1701 (resources:18.628.872), later I kill: 800 wyvern and 1618 grifin (resources:20.573.705).  

Payout from 91 lvl: demon 2682, warlok 892 (resources:17.172.716) 

So I get 3.4mln resources less then I spend

Somebodi can give me a bit informations about full BG revard?

Oct 3, 2016, 09:2110/03/16
231783
gediminas.skunsmonas said:

So I get 3.4mln resources less then I spend

Hmm...and what if you look at BGs in a long run? I mean not just 1-2 BGs, but 10, 30, 50. Are the results the same?
Oct 3, 2016, 16:2910/03/16
10/04/13
3875
Alyona Kolomiitseva said:

gediminas.skunsmonas said:

So I get 3.4mln resources less then I spend

Hmm...and what if you look at BGs in a long run? I mean not just 1-2 BGs, but 10, 30, 50. Are the results the same?
Yeah pretty much.  The average return rate is about 90%. 
Oct 3, 2016, 22:3510/03/16
Oct 3, 2016, 22:42(edited)
231783
Alyona Kolomiitseva said:

gediminas.skunsmonas said:

So I get 3.4mln resources less then I spend

Hmm...and what if you look at BGs in a long run? I mean not just 1-2 BGs, but 10, 30, 50. Are the results the same?
before upgrade always I get exactly how I spend (always I kill 10%  more then I get revard before). After upgrade every higer lvl I get 1-3 mln less then I spend
Oct 3, 2016, 22:4510/03/16
231783

BiohazarD said:


Alyona Kolomiitseva said:


gediminas.skunsmonas said:

So I get 3.4mln resources less then I spend

Hmm...and what if you look at BGs in a long run? I mean not just 1-2 BGs, but 10, 30, 50. Are the results the same?
Yeah pretty much.  The average return rate is about 90%. 
I no need formula how need kill BG, I just want know how or when I can expected normal revard

Oct 4, 2016, 10:5010/04/16
231783
gediminas.skunsmonas said:


before upgrade always I get exactly how I spend (always I kill 10%  more then I get revard before). After upgrade every higer lvl I get 1-3 mln less then I spend
Maybe you feel the difference because you started doing higher-level BGs?
Oct 5, 2016, 07:0610/05/16
Oct 5, 2016, 07:06(edited)
10/04/13
3875
gediminas.skunsmonas said:

BiohazarD said:


Alyona Kolomiitseva said:


gediminas.skunsmonas said:

So I get 3.4mln resources less then I spend

Hmm...and what if you look at BGs in a long run? I mean not just 1-2 BGs, but 10, 30, 50. Are the results the same?
Yeah pretty much.  The average return rate is about 90%. 
I no need formula how need kill BG, I just want know how or when I can expected normal revard

With bgs you will always lose more than you win back.  That's just how the current algorithm works. 
Aug 23, 2016, 00:2508/23/16
Aug 23, 2016, 01:55(edited)
07/31/16
9

fairly new at this.

I have no idea what to send to a battleground - I just send all my offence to a red and all my defense to a green. seems to work at lower level bgs.

I just stop fighting when I get losses I can't replenish fast enough. .. and wait til I have enough units and fight the bg level again.

Is this wrong? crazy? silly? whats the right way?

Is the calculator necessary and if so why does the game not provide those stats without it?
The topic is locked. You cannot post comments.