IronApex Turok said:

most beacons are level 1s. whats the point of adding more?  no one wants them anymore. 

Hi!

There are still new leagues or leagues without beacons - this give them the chance to develop their leagues... I'm thinking this is one of the reasons...

Best reagrds!

What the game need is content and new players not beacons. 

Hello.

As Bogdan said, there are still new Leagues in the game or Leagues which want to hold more Beacons.

Plus after Massacre some Leagues could lose their Beacons.

Oracle said:

What the game need is content and new players not beacons. 

The game is dying. 

Well they wont attract much new players with their current model and the state of the game. No matter much they spam current players with pop-ups to invite friends... I guess most have run out of "friends" to ask, and those you asked, maybe not your friends anylonger.... :p

Alina Phoenix said:

Hello.

As Bogdan said, there are still new Leagues in the game or Leagues which want to hold more Beacons.

Plus after Massacre some Leagues could lose their Beacons.

That's why new ones were added to the game.

New Leagues will never be allowed to hold beacons and existing leagues either hold too many beacons (many are level one) or they have no wish to attempt to hold beacons

Game imbalance has made it impossible for any normal league to hold a level 5 beacon without being completely wiped out

And Stormfall is one of the WORST games for this type of game imbalance because you refuse to give us Unified Beacons and you refuse to protect our beacons with Force Limits, which means that one coiner could demolish any beacon on the map and suffer minimal losses

Defense of any kind is obsolete in this game

Just get out of your Ivory Tower and examine the maps

How many level zero forts?

How many deserted beacons?

How many level one beacons?

Even the Hamlets are left empty for 99% of the time

The only reason high ranking league want to capture the new beacons is because they believe that outer beacons control more territory, but this has never been officially confirmed. It is probably an urban myth. If you disagree with this then show us the proof. Show us the screenshots

aye....

the death of the game can be seen on the beacon map. 

lol, a new league has NO chance of holding a beacon. thats why you see so many empty ones. even established coiner leagues cant hold them any more. 

Like most people have inferred from the beacon additions. This game needs to be balanced on a new scale, players who spend x amount of money are just trampling new players or free to play. Very dry game at this time, I would encourage the dev's to evaluate these "special" deals, that are so amazing...

toggit said:

Alina Phoenix said:

Hello.

As Bogdan said, there are still new Leagues in the game or Leagues which want to hold more Beacons.

Plus after Massacre some Leagues could lose their Beacons.

That's why new ones were added to the game.

New Leagues will never be allowed to hold beacons and existing leagues either hold too many beacons (many are level one) or they have no wish to attempt to hold beacons

Game imbalance has made it impossible for any normal league to hold a level 5 beacon without being completely wiped out

And Stormfall is one of the WORST games for this type of game imbalance because you refuse to give us Unified Beacons and you refuse to protect our beacons with Force Limits, which means that one coiner could demolish any beacon on the map and suffer minimal losses

Defense of any kind is obsolete in this game

Just get out of your Ivory Tower and examine the maps

How many level zero forts?

How many deserted beacons?

How many level one beacons?

Even the Hamlets are left empty for 99% of the time

The only reason high ranking league want to capture the new beacons is because they believe that outer beacons control more territory, but this has never been officially confirmed. It is probably an urban myth. If you disagree with this then show us the proof. Show us the screenshots

Hello.

The Map is regularly checked and analyzed by our devs. 

Regarding Attack Limits for Beacons, I'll forward it to devs.

> The only reason high ranking league want to capture the new beacons is because they believe that outer beacons control more territory, but this has never been officially confirmed.

The territory doesn't depend on the location of your Beacon. It doesn't matter whether it's located in the middle of the map or on its edge.

wildaxeman said:

too bad Alina. i do not want break rules, but your comment above stating, beacon location does not affect territory, shows your  "knowledge". are you sure, you fit on CM position?

Hello.

There is an advantage of holding a Beacon on the edge of the Map, but the advantage is that in this case your Beacon is not surrounded by Beacons of other Leagues as it could be in the middle of the Map. Correspondingly, the Beacon gives you more territory.

> The territory doesn't depend on the location of your Beacon. It doesn't matter whether it's located in the middle of the map or on its edge.

I meant that graphically it doesn't matter whether your Beacon is in the middle or on the edge. The main factors are how much your Beacon is surrounded by Beacons of other Leagues and what Level od these Beacons are.

wildaxeman said:

too bad Alina. i do not want break rules, but your comment above stating, beacon location does not affect territory, shows your  "knowledge". are you sure, you fit on CM position?

Hello.

There is an advantage of holding a Beacon on the edge of the Map, but the advantage is that in this case your Beacon is not surrounded by Beacons of other Leagues as it could be in the middle of the Map. Correspondingly, the Beacon gives you more territory.

> The territory doesn't depend on the location of your Beacon. It doesn't matter whether it's located in the middle of the map or on its edge.

I meant that graphically it doesn't matter whether your Beacon is in the middle or on the edge. The main factors are how much your Beacon is surrounded by Beacons of other Leagues and what Level od these Beacons are.

Alina Phoenix said:

wildaxeman said:

too bad Alina. i do not want break rules, but your comment above stating, beacon location does not affect territory, shows your  "knowledge". are you sure, you fit on CM position?

Hello.

There is an advantage of holding a Beacon on the edge of the Map, but the advantage is that in this case your Beacon is not surrounded by Beacons of other Leagues as it could be in the middle of the Map. Correspondingly, the Beacon gives you more territory.

> The territory doesn't depend on the location of your Beacon. It doesn't matter whether it's located in the middle of the map or on its edge.

I meant that graphically it doesn't matter whether your Beacon is in the middle or on the edge. The main factors are how much your Beacon is surrounded by Beacons of other Leagues and what Level od these Beacons are.

Therefore the location of your beacon in terms of territory and influence matters? 

wildaxeman said:

too bad Alina. i do not want break rules, but your comment above stating, beacon location does not affect territory, shows your  "knowledge". are you sure, you fit on CM position?

Actually, she's absolutely right, but it's just a matter of perspective...