Why can you not provide some useful info once in a while

" adjusted the reward for upgrading a champion to its max level"

this does not tell me anything useful - was the adjustment up or down what is the new value?

why are you so  afraid to tell us what you are actually doing/

From other comments, it seem that you don't really care about us knowing anything useful

Shame on you

Hello TWOEAGLE 

The Changes of emerald rewards are as follows for Maxing 4 ,5 and 6 Star Champions

Was   100 ,200 ,500 

Now  25 , 50 . 125 

I hope this answers your question 

The other mechanics of the champions upgrades remain the same in regards to enlightenment 

in that you get an additional emerald reward after enlightening a Maxed level 30  and maxing it again

And what was the logic and reason for such a reduction in the emerald payout?

is this another attempt to make us spend more ;

Note that you have only found one more way to push more players away from your site

I fully support Brightstar's comment

The feeling from all our league members (140+) is similar frustration as to your marketing approach and overall money grab attitude.

The reason given was to add balance to the game. 

I don't see it! I don't agree with it and I also don't like It !

I know I won't be spending as much time with that part of the game. 

It's a real shame I hope they at least give us some of the emeralds back!

( You know to add Balance to the Game ) 

I really don't understand why this change was made you would think that the emeralds that would of been earned while using the new auto battle feature ( Using the old rates) would of been more of an incentive for players to obtain them. With the present upgrade rewards it would seem such a feature loses it's luster as the incentive to use it is greatly diminished. 

All I can do is let the Devs know what you all think so please make sure what you post is within the forum rules. 

Because a post that needs to be deleted doesn't get seen by the devs ! 

I hope they change their minds in Game development

Lord Oberon said:

Tweaked Player Protection so it disappears after attacking a Beacon, League Fortress, Hamlet, or Settlement

This has been badly designed (as usual)

Collecting resources from a vacant hamlet is not an attack

I can (almost) understand complaints if protected players are attacking beacons and fortresses, but including hamlets makes no sense

Defense units at a hamlet are NOT protected from attack, so why remove ALL protection from their castles?

http://prntscr.com/me5c3g

Wesley Pringle said:

Because it give owners of the troops killed the option to counter attack

I did specify VACANT hamlets, so no troops are expected to be killed
Why did you add any comment?
However, I did bet myself that you would say exactly what you did say hahahaha

but even if what you say was correct, all experienced players understand that hamlets are FAIR GAME  (and so should Plarium) = http://prntscr.com/meteam

Castles, Fortresses and Beacons are not

You are comparing chalk and cheese  lol

Any 'counter attack' would be a travesty of the combat rules in this game - needless escalation
Hamlet and siege attacks do not create enemy status

Nobody is stupid enough to send defense to any hamlet, settlement or siege without expecting them to be attacked, so there can never be any excuse for a revenge raid upon a neutral player

And I knowing what your reply would be asked ahead of time if my answer was correct ! 

And I was told it was ! 

Have a nice Day !

As for people's intelligence who can really say what they will do or expect?

I've seen many not very smart things done by some players !

As far as FAIR GAME in My book if you attack any thing or one reprisal attacks are fair Game ! 

Wesley Pringle said:

And I knowing what your reply would be asked ahead of time if my answer was correct ! 

And I was told it was ! 

Have a nice Day !

As for people's intelligence who can really say what they will do or expect?

I've seen many not very smart things done by some players !

As far as FAIR GAME in My book if you attack any thing or one reprisal attacks are fair Game ! 

Plus your making up situations that don't exist show me where anyone has lost their protection from attacking an empty Hamlet!

 

Most fair minded players will disagree with you, and disagree with plariums twisting of the combat rules because of one or two complaints from gung-ho league marshals about beacon attacks - they should complain to the attacker's league, not expect the rules to be changed

but what they actually were complaining about was the misuse of weors protection spells ... not the 7 day protection for players returning to the game

and none of this has got ANYTHING to do with hamlets

This situation was not 'made-up'

It DID happen and I DID provide a screenshot
Maybe you should read my posts before typing
https://prnt.sc/me5c3g

I showed the complete topic with your question in it. 

and my answer 

But you are here just to complain as always trying to trip up Mods and those trying to help. 

Rather Sad that you don't seem to have any other objective in these forums most times 

I wasn't aware that (Most Players had elected you to speak for them ) I must of missed the Memo !