The KoK have been spreading a conspiracy that doing higher level BG results in better rewards. I have provided both logical and mathematical evidence to disqualify this claim.
And now they are singing the same song I sang, and was condemned for.
I am afraid you are a victim of this KoK sponsored false ideology. At a glance in the forum you will find many players who are experiencing troubles with their battleground in higher levels.
My advice, unless you can produce the amount of units that can support a level 165 BG you shouldn't go any higher. Your bank is heavily dependent on your castle building ability, plus your coining ability.
If you do go higher and you can't maintain your production to match your highest BG bank you risk deflating your accumulative bank with tax. This will result in you losing your army over time.
Ooh, if that is the case then there nothing you can do. Naturally when you engage with a high BG you receive the next high BG. But there is a limit on how many high BG you can receive.
I haven't worked the number but it could be between 5-25.
You will receive the next high BG you tomorrow, and can go higher after reset, eg 0000 UCT.
The highest BG is currently 180, they will add 185 the following week, if they haven't.
For your second question, yes you will be payed, just make sure your bank is full. But you won't receive a skull. You will receive level 166 tomorrow, at that time.
That is a fairly recent post.ll Very recent, if you don't tracklli what you say then I can't do it for you.
You also continue making claims. Do you mind explaining in terms of numbers why are BG loss making. You like to use this term.
Also your buddy Biohazard is spreading another ideology. Disputing an established fact without caring to prove it as false. On countless thread, he has been saying BG tax is 3%. The BG bank used in this forum, has for years been 12.5%, you can find it in blanking battleground.
Oracle said:
That is a fairly recent post.ll Very recent, if you don't tracklli what you say then I can't do it for you.
You also continue making claims. Do you mind explaining in terms of numbers why are BG loss making. You like to use this term.
Also your buddy Biohazard is spreading another ideology. Disputing an established fact without caring to prove it as false. On countless thread, he has been saying BG tax is 3%. The BG bank used in this forum, has for years been 12.5%, you can find it in blanking battleground.
I have estimated between 3% and 10% and that the exact value is unknown. Some people have claimed 12.5%, some higher and some lower. The tax is not directly visible in the battleground system, just in calculators people have made where they guessed a value then programmed that value into the calculator.
Please don't misquote me, some of us still have integrity and dislike being used to spread false information.
Just one of many posts where I point out that BG's are loss making. And pointing out to keep your BG level low.Yep, for most people it's best to keep their bgs around the 61-80 level.https://plarium.com/forum/en/stormfall-age-of-war/game-discussion/74002_questions-about-bg/
Oracle said:
That is a fairly recent post.ll Very recent, if you don't tracklli what you say then I can't do it for you.
You also continue making claims. Do you mind explaining in terms of numbers why are BG loss making. You like to use this term.
Also your buddy Biohazard is spreading another ideology. Disputing an established fact without caring to prove it as false. On countless thread, he has been saying BG tax is 3%. The BG bank used in this forum, has for years been 12.5%, you can find it in blanking battleground.
Lord Oracle
nobody konws how much is the tax. is not a 3% and of course is not 12.5%. neither of both amounts of tax can be taken as certain as the moment we all work with suppotions.
maybe the tax on that post is a bit obsolete as the moment i wrote it when people begin to work with that tax about the first change of bg mechanism and i should rewrite the post although there are some updates since summer.
actually i can assume almost 100% which is the real tax applied on bgs but as the moment i cant prove 100% why is this tax im not going to tell it but be sure a lot of people is working with it long time ago.
so Lord Biohazard works with 3%, myself was working with 12.5% long time both can work and both are wrong at same time. sure u work with other tax and another lord works with other...nobody incluiding you can sure 100% which is the correct and of course nobody can tell that other lord is wrong or right in this feature of game since it is confidential.
so please once again try to understand other lords vision, and not try to fight agains other thoughts about bg theories. if you have one and it works for u, congrats you maybe nearer than other to discover the grial. but this does not mean your truth is the universal truth
Regards
BiohazarD said:
Oracle said:
That is a fairly recent post.ll Very recent, if you don't tracklli what you say then I can't do it for you.
You also continue making claims. Do you mind explaining in terms of numbers why are BG loss making. You like to use this term.
Also your buddy Biohazard is spreading another ideology. Disputing an established fact without caring to prove it as false. On countless thread, he has been saying BG tax is 3%. The BG bank used in this forum, has for years been 12.5%, you can find it in blanking battleground.
I have estimated between 3% and 10% and that the exact value is unknown. Some people have claimed 12.5%, some higher and some lower. The tax is not directly visible in the battleground system, just in calculators people have made where they guessed a value then programmed that value into the calculator.
Please don't misquote me, some of us still have integrity and dislike being used to spread false information.
What do you mean by guise a value. Cause I calculated my tax to be in the margin of 11,3. I filtered it back to 10 %.
Juglar del Viento said:
Oracle said:
That is a fairly recent post.ll Very recent, if you don't tracklli what you say then I can't do it for you.
You also continue making claims. Do you mind explaining in terms of numbers why are BG loss making. You like to use this term.
Also your buddy Biohazard is spreading another ideology. Disputing an established fact without caring to prove it as false. On countless thread, he has been saying BG tax is 3%. The BG bank used in this forum, has for years been 12.5%, you can find it in blanking battleground.
Lord Oracle
nobody konws how much is the tax. is not a 3% and of course is not 12.5%. neither of both amounts of tax can be taken as certain as the moment we all work with suppotions.
maybe the tax on that post is a bit obsolete as the moment i wrote it when people begin to work with that tax about the first change of bg mechanism and i should rewrite the post although there are some updates since summer.
actually i can assume almost 100% which is the real tax applied on bgs but as the moment i cant prove 100% why is this tax im not going to tell it but be sure a lot of people is working with it long time ago.
so Lord Biohazard works with 3%, myself was working with 12.5% long time both can work and both are wrong at same time. sure u work with other tax and another lord works with other...nobody incluiding you can sure 100% which is the correct and of course nobody can tell that other lord is wrong or right in this feature of game since it is confidential.
so please once again try to understand other lords vision, and not try to fight agains other thoughts about bg theories. if you have one and it works for u, congrats you maybe nearer than other to discover the grial. but this does not mean your truth is the universal truth
Regards
In contrast, I am just trying to help Biohazard to provide proof for his claim.
Yes we don't have proof that our conclusion on BG are correct, but we have data, and evidence to support our conclusion.
We work with data,with evidence, we don't guise, we calculate, arrive at a conclusion and then tell people
How did you do this calculation? How many bgs did you use for this test? There is a lot of randomization in the bg payouts, so in order to get an accurate estimate you need to do at least a few hundred bgs and average out the results. If I recall I did about 200 bgs (over the course of a few weeks), then calculated that on average I got back a bit less than 97% of the troops I lost on each one. A more accurate estimate could be obtained through a larger sample size, but I'm pretty sure the actual value isn't higher than 10%.BiohazarD said:
Oracle said:
That is a fairly recent post.ll Very recent, if you don't tracklli what you say then I can't do it for you.
You also continue making claims. Do you mind explaining in terms of numbers why are BG loss making. You like to use this term.
Also your buddy Biohazard is spreading another ideology. Disputing an established fact without caring to prove it as false. On countless thread, he has been saying BG tax is 3%. The BG bank used in this forum, has for years been 12.5%, you can find it in blanking battleground.
I have estimated between 3% and 10% and that the exact value is unknown. Some people have claimed 12.5%, some higher and some lower. The tax is not directly visible in the battleground system, just in calculators people have made where they guessed a value then programmed that value into the calculator.
Please don't misquote me, some of us still have integrity and dislike being used to spread false information.
What do you mean by guise a value. Cause I calculated my tax to be in the margin of 11,3. I filtered it back to 10 %.
Did you guise your 3%
BiohazarD said:
Oracle said:
How did you do this calculation? How many bgs did you use for this test? There is a lot of randomization in the bg payouts, so in order to get an accurate estimate you need to do at least a few hundred bgs and average out the results. If I recall I did about 200 bgs (over the course of a few weeks), then calculated that on average I got back a bit less than 97% of the troops I lost on each one. A more accurate estimate could be obtained through a larger sample size, but I'm pretty sure the actual value isn't higher than 10%.BiohazarD said:
Oracle said:
That is a fairly recent post.ll Very recent, if you don't tracklli what you say then I can't do it for you.
You also continue making claims. Do you mind explaining in terms of numbers why are BG loss making. You like to use this term.
Also your buddy Biohazard is spreading another ideology. Disputing an established fact without caring to prove it as false. On countless thread, he has been saying BG tax is 3%. The BG bank used in this forum, has for years been 12.5%, you can find it in blanking battleground.
I have estimated between 3% and 10% and that the exact value is unknown. Some people have claimed 12.5%, some higher and some lower. The tax is not directly visible in the battleground system, just in calculators people have made where they guessed a value then programmed that value into the calculator.
Please don't misquote me, some of us still have integrity and dislike being used to spread false information.
What do you mean by guise a value. Cause I calculated my tax to be in the margin of 11,3. I filtered it back to 10 %.
Did you guise your 3%
My advice stop spreading guised information. The is no way you would calculate BG tax from that method.
You don't even need to do 100 BG to calculate your tax. It took me 8 months to calculate mine, in that span I did over 1000 BG, recorded everything.
After accounting for margin of error I got 10%.
Your method of calculation is flawed.
Really? What method did you use then? Please enlighten us.BiohazarD said:
Oracle said:
How did you do this calculation? How many bgs did you use for this test? There is a lot of randomization in the bg payouts, so in order to get an accurate estimate you need to do at least a few hundred bgs and average out the results. If I recall I did about 200 bgs (over the course of a few weeks), then calculated that on average I got back a bit less than 97% of the troops I lost on each one. A more accurate estimate could be obtained through a larger sample size, but I'm pretty sure the actual value isn't higher than 10%.BiohazarD said:
Oracle said:
That is a fairly recent post.ll Very recent, if you don't tracklli what you say then I can't do it for you.
You also continue making claims. Do you mind explaining in terms of numbers why are BG loss making. You like to use this term.
Also your buddy Biohazard is spreading another ideology. Disputing an established fact without caring to prove it as false. On countless thread, he has been saying BG tax is 3%. The BG bank used in this forum, has for years been 12.5%, you can find it in blanking battleground.
I have estimated between 3% and 10% and that the exact value is unknown. Some people have claimed 12.5%, some higher and some lower. The tax is not directly visible in the battleground system, just in calculators people have made where they guessed a value then programmed that value into the calculator.
Please don't misquote me, some of us still have integrity and dislike being used to spread false information.
What do you mean by guise a value. Cause I calculated my tax to be in the margin of 11,3. I filtered it back to 10 %.
Did you guise your 3%My advice stop spreading guised information. The is no way you would calculate BG tax from that method.
You don't even need to do 100 BG to calculate your tax. It took me 8 months to calculate mine, in that span I did over 1000 BG, recorded everything.
After accounting for margin of error I got 10%.
Your method of calculation is flawed.