All Categories

Unlimited Sorcery Spells

Unlimited Sorcery Spells

Search
Feb 29, 2020, 05:2802/29/20
02/20/17
2

Unlimited Sorcery Spells

It makes minimal sense (in my opinion) to limit the amount of sorcery spells a castle can use per day when there are so many people with 20+ alts. That essentially provides no limitation, a single person can fb one other person with over 2000 fbs per day. Instead, Plarium should limit the amount of fbs a person can receive per day. Each person should be limited to only receiving a certain amount of fbs. This would prevent people with a lot of alts from just abusing the fbs and turning a wargame into a bunch of chickens casting a wrath of weor anytime they have to do castle warfare.
Views
448
Comments
3
Comments
BiohazarDModerator
Mar 1, 2020, 16:4003/01/20
10/04/13
3817
Sir Dan Saul Knight said:

It would be a shame to see organised league activity go down the drain as the sacrifice for this. It's something that can separate a good league from a bad league.

If you did that you would also prevent leagues / coalitions from identifying FB targets and sharing them among the league / coalition. A lot of ppl with limited time during a particular event will pick up PvP for league events like that. Having that option is something that can separate a good / well organised league from a bad league.

There are other scenarios where ppl might work together, which would be lost.

I do agree mass FB'ing from alts is not a good thing. But there are only a handful of players that can do that and they will have very limited numbers of FB's so this is only very rarely going to be a problem. This is a problem very few ppl will ever encounter.

So on balance for me we it would be using a sledgehammer to crack a nut.



They used to, but now there's that clan pvp tourney that runs like every 2 weeks that gives 20 fireballs as a reward.  So you make a league full of alts, each time the tournament comes up each one uses 1 fb and gets 20 back.  If you have 50 alts that's about 2k fireballs a month for very little effort.  
Mar 2, 2020, 18:5203/02/20
Mar 2, 2020, 18:56(edited)
08/09/15
580

ah u guys didnt notice his argument my friends and thats because he wasnt himself clear about it 

what he meant ,i think was about one player being limited for how many he can throw not the whole league !

he wasnt clear cause it seems he dsnt know how its done ! he meant one player using alts throwing hundreds using his alts not the league activity limiting

that would require a an IP ban on more than one account log in entry ! so only one account can FB ,the rest cant ! 

yeah plarium wouldnt do that,honestly i wouldnt do it myself as it would off balance the game !

the FBs each catle receive when they start ,as a new castle is 20 ,i.e. the alts they create.so to create a whole system just to prevent this FB which will be done at 2 x throwings would be a waste of staff time which they clearly dnt have enough of !

writing algorythms,blocking IPs just for one action for which someone like me can easily Bypass by using a proxy,VPN or VPS which in the end wont do much is just not worth all the effort put in 

the clan pvp dsnt give much FBs too for a league of alts too. 20 FBs is for the max rewards, in training league of us with 150 members we dnt receive 20 how can a league of alts do so ! 

i mean in the end its just my idea and i can be wrong,but even if im wrong about the process im sure about the action they will take ! none !

fURY,

heir to nothing,

shTpaTown 

BiohazarDModerator
Mar 4, 2020, 07:1703/04/20
10/04/13
3817

fURY said:


ah u guys didnt notice his argument my friends and thats because he wasnt himself clear about it 

what he meant ,i think was about one player being limited for how many he can throw not the whole league !

he wasnt clear cause it seems he dsnt know how its done ! he meant one player using alts throwing hundreds using his alts not the league activity limiting

that would require a an IP ban on more than one account log in entry ! so only one account can FB ,the rest cant ! 

yeah plarium wouldnt do that,honestly i wouldnt do it myself as it would off balance the game !

the FBs each catle receive when they start ,as a new castle is 20 ,i.e. the alts they create.so to create a whole system just to prevent this FB which will be done at 2 x throwings would be a waste of staff time which they clearly dnt have enough of !

writing algorythms,blocking IPs just for one action for which someone like me can easily Bypass by using a proxy,VPN or VPS which in the end wont do much is just not worth all the effort put in 

the clan pvp dsnt give much FBs too for a league of alts too. 20 FBs is for the max rewards, in training league of us with 150 members we dnt receive 20 how can a league of alts do so ! 

i mean in the end its just my idea and i can be wrong,but even if im wrong about the process im sure about the action they will take ! none !

fURY,

heir to nothing,

shTpaTown 

It's not that difficult to do if you're having some of the alts do bgs during brawl to win troops, then having them kill off each others troops for pvp.  10 people with 15 accounts each could manage that while only putting in a few hours a week.  

Plarium could just add a limit that one castle can only be hit with 200 fireballs a day or 500 per week (or whatever they thought was an appropriate number).  It wouldn't be that difficult to code, and would prevent somebody from getting hit with a ridiculous amount of fireballs from an alt league.   Although it wouldn't stop an alt league from fireballing everybody in another league, they just couldn't all focus on one person.