And so begins the end game....................

Almericus said:

And so begins the end game....................

I assume you mean the end of SF's life.

I do not believe this is "Super Leagues"  

I am thinking is more Spirit Wardens.

Something added that is not expected. Much Like Spirit Wardens be for Stoneheart castles.

We will see.

My real thoughts about this is more to the Current ranking system is meaning less now for leagues.  It give a new Meaning less Ranking system for people to cheer about a their "Coalition" rank

Now I am by no means talking down to any leagues that are in a Coalition.  I feel this was implemented on face book today as well and most of the leagues there have a Coalition.

Just for us on server 1. The word has completely a different Meaning, Time, Place, & People to Defined it.

ETsphere said:

I do not believe this is "Super Leagues"  

I am thinking is more Spirit Wardens.

Something added that is not expected. Much Like Spirit Wardens be for Stoneheart castles.

We will see.

My real thoughts about this is more to the Current ranking system is meaning less now for leagues.  It give a new Meaning less Ranking system for people to cheer about a their "Coalition" rank

Now I am by no means talking down to any leagues that are in a Coalition.  I feel this was implemented on face book today as well and most of the leagues there have a Coalition.

Just for us on server 1. The word has completely a different Meaning, Time, Place, & People to Defined it.

I don't believe it either. But according to some moderators of the facebook forum, they say that it is the same. Here they still don't respond, but I suppose it will be something similar. And if so, I feel it would be the biggest mistake in this game. That update the "Super League" was very interesting and could help revive this game. But hey, you know very well that Plarium only wants more money giving little in return.

if i remember correctly, back when there was only 1 server we experimented with super coalitions.....

IronApex said:

if i remember correctly, back when there was only 1 server we experimented with super coalitions.....

and the result was extremely bad for the game.   I g uess this is the kinda ideas that bubble up when you ban veteran players and their feedback and voice is no longer present on the forums. 

From what I can see (or understand), it just add visibility to who is under what banner. Doesn't change much at all. If you know a,b,c and d is sharing bed....  brand them with a sticker to make it official, doesn't change much at all. 

People who like pvp, doesn't really like to build much sand castles, they like to knock them over. So if one side become to strong, and there is no real challenge left or pvp to be had....  things will just start to crumble and break apart from the inside. Factions will splinter, new powers rise, old ones fall and so forth. Its the nature of the beast called pvp.

IronApex said:

if i remember correctly, back when there was only 1 server we experimented with super coalitions.....

and the result was extremely bad for the game.   I g uess this is the kinda ideas that bubble up when you ban veteran players and their feedback and voice is no longer present on the forums. 

From what I can see (or understand), it just add visibility to who is under what banner. Doesn't change much at all. If you know a,b,c and d is sharing bed....  brand them with a sticker to make it official, doesn't change much at all. 

People who like pvp, doesn't really like to build much sand castles, they like to knock them over. So if one side become to strong, and there is no real challenge left or pvp to be had....  things will just start to crumble and break apart from the inside. Factions will splinter, new powers rise, old ones fall and so forth. Its the nature of the beast called pvp.

If all there is to queue units and throw them in the catacombs on a day to day basis, that is not what drive pvp players to play a game.

On our server the game is already basically split - two sides of the fence then everyone else ...

Coalition Chat Window......

Other wise this is relay meaning less on many levels.

Every league Knows what leagues all ready working with each other.

I mean think of it spy's are in our leagues any how.

Just a coalition chat window alone would be valuable  

last year I remember players complaining on the facebook page wanting this exact thing in the game with coalitions, looks like they got their wish, just like there was some big leagues who had their badges all maxed out complaining the game has ended for them and wanted new badges to upgrade to continue their gameplay, well they got their wish too, most league badges have gone up to 20

The Coalition banner has NO VALUE to the game.

Dose not change how leagues interact with in a Coalition.

No difference then "Allie" 

Like I said this change was rolled out to All games. face book, Planetarium at the same time.  This was meant for facebook.  ( And not for "us" who play plarium games)  

Thar are Less then 40 leagues on this server 

 All of the leagues are connected to  one of 2 sides or neutral to both.  

(And I am not talking about face book servers. none of us give a hoot about facebook here. Games are not played the say way.  Other wise put the Rebels on Face book Server 1 and remove the beacon force limit. Every one here knows EXACTLY what I am talking about.  Heck I have Players that are apposing Rebels would want in Rebels for that Culling  )

On our server the game is already basically split - two sides of the fence then everyone else ...

The only thing I see that Coalitions will do is as previously stated more strongly define alliances?  Correct me if I am wrong ....

Lets let the coalitions grab 1 beacon, build it to a 5, have a free for all and see whos left. What do u say about that ET?

Aegon Targaryen said:

The bigger they become, the sooner the break apart.    Corruption increases exponentially with size.

Yeah, but. If the only thing that changes is like a "label" saying x and y is allied.... what does that change? Its usually well known anyways. 

Afaik it still doesn't allow different leagues to stack a beacon or a fort together. Or gather like a alliance army to hit with.

you really think this is a good thing, i can see no positives in having it on the game, unless they come out with some kind of game changerJEZEBEL said:

On our server the game is already basically split - two sides of the fence then everyone else ...

The only thing I see that Coalitions will do is as previously stated more strongly define alliances?  Correct me if I am wrong ....

LoneWolfe said:

you really think this is a good thing, i can see no positives in having it on the game, unless they come out with some kind of game changerJEZEBEL said:

On our server the game is already basically split - two sides of the fence then everyone else ...

The only thing I see that Coalitions will do is as previously stated more strongly define alliances?  Correct me if I am wrong ....

and your point is?  I didn't claim for it to be a game changer :))

Hey!

Super League = Coalitions. When we made a teaser, we didn't know yet the official name of this feature. That's why we called it Super League.