Yes I don't think initially Plarium intended BG levels to be so high - they keep adding levels but give us no new saga BG's

Jezebel said:

Yes I don't think initially Plarium intended BG levels to be so high - they keep adding levels but give us no new saga BG's

I wouldn't hold my breath for new ones though they never seem to want to give us something for nothing

Well Saga quests require a bit more effort than just raise levels ....to make happen.... effort equals cost....  after all :p

Jezebel said:

Yes I don't think initially Plarium intended BG levels to be so high - they keep adding levels but give us no new saga BG's

I wouldn't hold my breath for new ones though they never seem to want to give us something for nothing

Well Saga quests require a bit more effort than just raise levels ....to make happen.... effort equals cost....  after all :p

yep could be interesting more saga levels

actually i dont know what to do with my wraiths ... :p

REgards

Hi !

Will be nice to have some new lvls on Saga Quests, pls feel free to add this post in Suggestions thread too...

Best regards!

Hello, Lords and Ladies! 

Though many of you are interested in new Saga Quests, devs don't plan to add any for now.

If i remember correctly the saga quests were about 4 to 1 in power compared to normal BG lvl

lvl10 quest was as strong as a normal lvl40

I think Stewart has a good point.  Also, Saga Quests are not part of the bank.  Therefore, the most economical way to hit them is with wraiths, which takes FOREVER and a day and then some in the 20s.

The most efficient BG levels are 70-90, though 50s and 60s are still pretty good.   Above BG 100, the efficiency drops.  While the minimum bank level in resources increases by 7% per level, I believe the maximum payout increases at less than 7% per level, and by the time you're in the 150s, and certainly at 190 (or is it 200 now?), the maximum payout is less than the minimum bank needed to trigger a large payout, which means you will never empty the bank in the higher BGs.  The law of diminishing returns at those high levels really doesn't make it worth it, IMO.

To receive as many efficient BGs as possible, you should ideally stop increasing your BG levels after 100 or so.   Since the only way to access new Saga Quests is to increase your BG levels by 4 over the previous SQ, going above BG100 to access any added SQs will get increasingly inefficient, and result in fewer efficient BG levels.

Without food restrictions, at those high levels, its really far better to just do

As far as the legendary units, you are still likely to get more power in troops alone by sticking with

Still, if new SQs were added, there would be no requirement to do them, so by all means, add them.  Maybe I'm missing something, but I only see a disadvantage in doing them.  To each their own.

Last column. Profit without maxed out Lost Arts, crystals or hero items; paragon or Dragon Stone activated; without +10/+20/+50% on; and without few tricks that can even further increase said profit.

I think Stewart has a good point.  Also, Saga Quests are not part of the bank.  Therefore, the most economical way to hit them is with wraiths, which takes FOREVER and a day and then some in the 20s.

The most efficient BG levels are 70-90, though 50s and 60s are still pretty good.   Above BG 100, the efficiency drops.  While the minimum bank level in resources increases by 7% per level, I believe the maximum payout increases at less than 7% per level, and by the time you're in the 150s, and certainly at 190 (or is it 200 now?), the maximum payout is less than the minimum bank needed to trigger a large payout, which means you will never empty the bank in the higher BGs.  The law of diminishing returns at those high levels really doesn't make it worth it, IMO.

To receive as many efficient BGs as possible, you should ideally stop increasing your BG levels after 100 or so.   Since the only way to access new Saga Quests is to increase your BG levels by 4 over the previous SQ, going above BG100 to access any added SQs will get increasingly inefficient, and result in fewer efficient BG levels.

Without food restrictions, at those high levels, its really far better to just do

As far as the legendary units, you are still likely to get more power in troops alone by sticking with

Still, if new SQs were added, there would be no requirement to do them, so by all means, add them.  Maybe I'm missing something, but I only see a disadvantage in doing them.  To each their own.