Please elaborate on this. How can this change improve the game? What do you actually mean by to be able to capture other cities as your own not just siege them. What should be the difference between such capturings and the existing sieges? 

Hello! I was surprised by this suggestion... and yes, I found it a little confusing. What do you mean to capture another city? take them under your own control isn't possible, its another player´s account... 

Hello,

I mean literaly take the city. Obviously the player who gets ''owned'' loses the account on  that city and reloads to another of his accounts as many have and the game allows it. Now because there is the money factor, all transactions and drachmas or anything that the defeated player purchased* will transfer to his new account.

Now for the question of improving and the difference of siege/capturing.

Well is another experience having 2 or more cities than one and you can do various things between them. When you siege them you dont take them, the same siege mechanic as we have now. But when you attack to capture it you take it for yourself , with (everything?) new (agreements, academy , ampitheater). I suppose it needs some requirements to take a city or perhaps a new unit to do so.

*will probable be city schema, artisans... around this type of purchases and more, except units.

Thank you for your responses and sorry for my late one. 

Archmage

Thanks for your comment. Did you check the post 'Which Suggestions we (do not) accept' before posting your suggestion? If no, please have a look at it.