Debate about capitals - New mecanisms
Hi everybody I want to discuss about a personal idea. In advance I beg your pardon for my english skills :)
As some of you know, crushing a Capital with an important balance of power give a lot of war points without damages (or few damages).
So hitting Coalitions with low level Capital is a very popular sport.
I suggest to create a "functionning" step between Coalitions with Capital >=10 and those with Cap <=9.>=10 crushed count in battle.
How it works?
1. Battle between attacking Coal >=10 and defending Coal <=9:>=9:>
2. Battle between two ">=10" or "<=9">=9">
3. Reverse situation 1. : mecanisms don't change. GOAL: >=10 Coalitions are not vulnerables from smaller ones, and give opportunities to <=9>=9>
I've another idea but, I think, utopian: prevent Coalitions under and above from attacking each other Capital. GOAL: Small Coalitions are protected and when they want to have a >=10 Capital they take their responsibilities.
PS. It is a personal idea I don't suggest to "higher authorities" so don't have fake hope :)
=9.>