I fully agree, with your analysis. There is no incentive for less fortunate player to stay in the game. Plarium made this about money collection with complete disregard and disrespect for their customers.

Also add the complete disregards to clients opinions.... (imagine a customer service disconnecting phones when problems came to see if the clients forget the problems and all goes by...)

Fortuna said:

Also add the complete disregards to clients opinions.... (imagine a customer service disconnecting phones when problems came to see if the clients forget the problems and all goes by...)

We all say the same, and no word ... i dont think they ahve realise what massive mistake they have done...

we are not all saying the same, its just a vocal few that keep posting all over the place and with no real argument. I am level 32 already on the agema's  everyone can get to level 30 just using res. they are giving sketches in pvp now so someone over a period of time can get to 32 without spending money if they invest the time. if you can get to level 20 you also don't need to upgrade your storage as the res levels mainly grain do not exceed that needed for level 20

the reality is that if you have 70 mil offense you end up with it having 7 mil def now, not that horrible. in real terms and not %  I don't think that is unreasonable. 

when do level 60 players really interact with level 90+ players like me, hardly.

if you want to argue these points argue them with number and figures not abstract percentages.

also why are you signing ALL agreement - sign the ones that cover your troops, who at this level build all troops, I have 4 different kinds of troops that is it. sign the agreements for those only

A few but with our game name and our coa so you can see what kind of players and who we do represent :-) I can not say that for you :-)

WE ahve explained in many ways how this makes the game loose the strategic point.

I suggest you read.

good game

Fortuna said:

A few but with our game name and our coa so you can see what kind of players and who we do represent :-) I can not say that for you :-)

WE ahve explained in many ways how this makes the game loose the strategic point.

I suggest you read.

good game

I have read it all and the only difference is makes is red on red and when it come to the actual amount defense added it it makes some difference but not a game changer, if you are going to attack 100 mil of offense you shouldn't be able to kill it off that easily and it cuts both ways.

what I have pointed out is that all the complaining about money is mute esp from some of the players that are complaining about it here. they are all spending a fortune anyway and the smaller players if they stick with the game can get to the same levels. I have level 75 players in my coal that have not spent a dime.

the bigger issue is if this is a move to remove the acropolis, that will change the way the game is played altogether. At that point I would not player either.

they could fix other things like the rewards from the events, if you win an event then you should bear no losses, that I believe is where the greed is.

I run a coal of 150 people and the are not saying a word they are upgrading their agreements and playing the game. I would rather not say who we are as I see the silly behavior in these forums. we have some coiners but the most are non spenders or very light spenders. I don't see this changing the game at high level with the stats I compared before 70mil off / 7 mil def, if you are going to hit that kind of army then the 7 mil is hardly some thing to worry about.

on the lower side it give the smaller players some protection from being totally wiped out by someone of that level. if a level 90 was to hit them they would be wiped out anyway.

blah blah blah said:

on the lower side it give the smaller players some protection from being totally wiped out by someone of that level. if a level 90 was to hit them they would be wiped out anyway.

Protection for smaller players? I don't think so. We know that it would be very hard for small players to have level 32 Sparta. That's what everyone is crying about actually. Plarium developers rejected lots of suggestions because they're telling us that we should keep the game's balance but the gap between small and big players will become even bigger now. If you're following the main thread about this issue, you will see that both small and big players are disappointed. And as I said on that thread, even very old players who don't speak on the forum appeared now just to express their disappointments.

Wy San Luis said:

blah blah blah said:

on the lower side it give the smaller players some protection from being totally wiped out by someone of that level. if a level 90 was to hit them they would be wiped out anyway.

Protection for smaller players? I don't think so. We know that it would be very hard for small players to have level 32 Sparta. That's what everyone is crying about actually. Plarium developers rejected lots of suggestions because they're telling us that we should keep the game's balance but the gap between small and big players will become even bigger now. If you're following the main thread about this issue, you will see that both small and big players are disappointed. And as I said on that thread, even very old players who don't speak on the forum appeared now just to express their disappointments.

there are players that will never get enough gps to even train the higher level troops, the javs for example can get to level 31 without sketches. AND the gap will never close as it stands that is a fact. the money players will always have an advantage and that comes in the form of resurrections in the most part. I don't disagree there are problems in the game but this change is not the biggest of them and how to address the balance between coiners and non-coiners is impossible the moment you allow anyone to buy anything. its like anything you do in life.