For years you have rejected the proposals of users on the forum (eg patch that changes the climate in the game, according to the season of reality, introduce the sea on the map, etc.), each time using the excuse that this was a game based on a "desert setting"...

... but now, in complete disagreement with what has been said so far, you have introduced the "Alpine troops" into the game, surrounded by snow, ice, mountains and covered up to the top of their heads with thermal coats, gloves, scarves, etc.

LOL.

I'm not saying that I liked all the proposals made by users in the past (for example: the "sea" did not excite me! As it would have entailed serious movement problems for ground troops), or that these ideas should have liked to you... but you could have simply replied to users that they were not feasible or that you didn't like them, rather than lying, asserting that the "desert setting" of the game was not suitable for these ideas.

For years you have rejected the proposals of users on the forum (eg patch that changes the climate in the game, according to the season of reality, introduce the sea on the map, etc.), each time using the excuse that this was a game based on a "desert setting"...

... but now, in complete disagreement with what has been said so far, you have introduced the "Alpine troops" into the game, surrounded by snow, ice, mountains and covered up to the top of their heads with thermal coats, gloves, scarves, etc.

LOL.

I'm not saying that I liked all the proposals made by users in the past (for example: the "sea" did not excite me! As it would have entailed serious movement problems for ground troops), or that these ideas should have liked to you... but you could have simply replied to users that they were not feasible or that you didn't like them, rather than lying, asserting that the "desert setting" of the game was not suitable for these ideas.

the idea of ​​the sea, on the other hand, would have many interesting developments.

for example having a ship, or more ships, that can be developed based on the load capacity, and according to its development, to be able to insert mechanized infantry and mobile artillery, according to the development it can embark + different troops and troops. that it is sent by sea to the attack of special MCs, which will have inside defense ships based on the development may have more or less troops, light, heavy artillery battleships, These MCs may be able to issue prizes in based on attacks suffered, and their knockdown level, which could be from level 10 up to level o, which would then pass into the attacker's hand. In short, to have long-term goals capable of giving immediate satisfaction, with prizes or special items. These MCs could also be seen as CASTLES, once conquered they would give greater development of the territory.

and just an idea ....

Besticio said:

the idea of ​​the sea, on the other hand, would have many interesting developments.

for example having a ship, or more ships, that can be developed based on the load capacity, and according to its development, to be able to insert mechanized infantry and mobile artillery, according to the development it can embark + different troops and troops. that it is sent by sea to the attack of special MCs, which will have inside defense ships based on the development may have more or less troops, light, heavy artillery battleships, These MCs may be able to issue prizes in based on attacks suffered, and their knockdown level, which could be from level 10 up to level o, which would then pass into the attacker's hand. In short, to have long-term goals capable of giving immediate satisfaction, with prizes or special items. These MCs could also be seen as CASTLES, once conquered they would give greater development of the territory.

and just an idea ....

Hello, Besticio! Thanks for sharing this idea with us. Indeed, it seems to be a good one. However, it will require a lot of time and resources to implement it. At the moment, we're focused on something else