"MC under attack!" - anomalous amount of losses suffered by me in the battle!
Hello.
Yesterday we received an attack on one of our Mining Complexes, by a player belonging to another alliance.
The reason why I now write here is because the amount of losses suffered by me personally is anomalous, both in relation to the amount of losses between my own units (I suffered more losses among the groups of less numerous units, compared to other types of units deployed by me that were more numerous and therefore should have been these last groups to suffer more losses!), and also anomalous in relation to the losses suffered by the other members of my Combine, who defended the MC with me.
In defending the MC, I am not the member with the largest defensive share deployed ... I am average with the forces deployed by the other members, indeed: lately I am even slightly below the expected quota! ... nevertheless, the losses consequent the attack received were inexplicably picked up for a good part (34 out of 80 = 42.5%) from my group of defending units deployed ... while most of the other members of my Combine did not suffer any loss! (even those who deployed a quantity of forces superior to mine!).
In short: to defend that MC seemed as if I had been only me with a few other affiliates who gave me support.
But I assure you that the scenario is not at all this! (the defensive forces deployed by me are derisory, compared to the collective amount!).
I would therefore like to understand why many of the defensive forces lost were only subtracted to me (in some types of units — as you can see from the graph below — 100% of losses belong exclusively to me!) rather than being shared equally among all the Combine members who take part to the battle (as has always happened so far).
As you will certainly understand, I can not post here the screenshots of the defensive forces deployed within the MC (which are sensitive and private information).
If you need this information, I invite technicians to enter the game and provide it for themselves.
All I can put here is a graphical comparison between my personal losses and total losses:
I also point out that, in my personal deployment:
- The types of units constituted by the greater quantity of units are in the "light infantry" department (ex: "sapper" is the biggest group); therefore, in proportion to my other departments, IT IS HERE (in "light infantry" department) that I would have had to suffer the greatest losses! (as always happens: the largest group suffers the largest number of losses) ... but it did not happen in this case: I suffered more losses in the departments "Armor" and "Aviation", despite these departments presented groups composed of a smaller quantity of units, compared to "light infantry" department.
- The types of units "Yellow Jeep" and "Black Jeep" (Mauler), are less numerous than the type "Syndicate Jeep" deployed by me, so even within this single department (Armor) we can see anomalies in the distribution of losses : I had more losses between Yellow and Black Jeep, instead of my "Syndicate Jeep", which were more numerous!
- Finally, there is also an anomaly in the losses suffered between the "Yellow Jeep" and "Black Jeep" types. These two groups are not only smaller than "Syndicate Jeeps" and therefore should have died less (as expressed in the previous point), but they are also composed by the same amount of units, therefore the losses should have been exactly the same in both groups ; instead, once again, this time this did not happen: I lost 2 + 3 Yellow Jeeps and 2 + 5 Black Jeeps ... why? ... I do not know ... it's a mystery!
I hope these issues will soon find a solution.
[example: a total of 5 drones "roc" (4 + 1 veteran) died in the battle ... for which reason they were all taken away from my deployed forces?!? ... it's a good question!]
Thanks for the support.
Platform -------> Plarium.com
Server ---------> Highlands
ID number..----> uid 733375 / pp12890765 / Highlands / segment01
