OP, I am here to tell you that people of the forums are lying to you.
First - Warmaiden is an End Game Viable hero.
Players use Warmaiden in End Game Content such has Doom Tower & Faction Wars.
Doom Tower Rotation's have Secret Rare Rooms which Warmaiden can be used.
Players have used her their consistently
Barbarian Faction only have 3 AOE Def Down heroes.
- Valla
- Armina
- Warmaiden
And Valla AOE Def Down isn't 100%
Thus, the evidence speaks for itself!
Second - 24 Thousand people agree Aleksander is trash.
Can In-Game reviews be wrong?
Sure, In-Game reviews can wrong if the sample size isn't Big enough.
Lets say their was only 100 reviews on Aleksander.
It could be possible that the reviews are wrong due to inexperienced players ranking him wrongly.
BUT CAN WE SAY 24 THOUSAND PEOPLE ARE WRONG?
We are talking about a collective group of people giving the hero Bad Scores.
The hero is bad for long list of reasons:
1st reason - Alex is bad because he is in the worst Faction Ever (High Elf's)
Alex AOE Def Down competes with 2 other heroes in the Faction (Tayrel + Royal Hunts)
Players will not use Alex over the other 2.
2nd reason - Alex requires Leggo Books to be consistent
With out Leggo Books what does Alex Do?
Literally, Nothing except removing buffs from 1 target which is pointless
3rd reason - Alex is Magic Affinity
Most nukers in the game are Magic Affinity which ideally want a Debuffer of a different affinity in order to complement them
4th reason - Alex is Attack Based
Most Attack based hero 's are to squishy to survive the outrageous damage late game content dishes out.
I can give more reason, but you get the point.
Third - Venom Mage is a great hero if your focusing on Clan Boss.
Venom Mage is Single Target Def Down Hero.
Alex & Warmaiden are AOE (Attack All Enemies) Def Down Hero.
If your doing CB, Venom can be great
If your doing Dungeons or Arena, you want to use Alex or Warmaiden